Imaging proteins sensitive to direct fusions using transient peptide-peptide interactions

Fluorescence microscopy enables specific visualization of proteins in living cells and has played an important role in our understanding of protein subcellular location and function. Some proteins, however, show altered localization and/or function when labeled using direct fusions to fluorescent proteins, making them difficult to study in live cells. Additionally, the resolution of fluorescence microscopy is limited to ∼200 nm, which is two orders of magnitude larger than the size of most proteins. To circumvent these challenges, we previously developed LIVE-PAINT, a live-cell super-resolution approach that takes advantage of short interacting peptides to transiently bind a fluorescent protein to the protein-of-interest. Here, we successfully use LIVE-PAINT to image yeast membrane proteins that do not tolerate the direct fusion of a fluorescent protein by using peptide tags as short as 5-residues. We also demonstrate that it is possible to resolve multiple proteins at the nanoscale concurrently using orthogonal peptide interaction pairs. FOR TABLE OF CONTENTS ONLY

[1]  Alexandra S. Eklund,et al.  Optimized Coiled-Coil Interactions for Multiplexed Peptide-PAINT. , 2023, Small.

[2]  C. MacDonald,et al.  Fur4 mediated uracil-scavenging to screen for surface protein regulators , 2021, bioRxiv.

[3]  J. Mears,et al.  GFP fluorescence tagging alters dynamin-related protein 1 oligomerization dynamics and creates disassembly-refractory puncta to mediate mitochondrial fission , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[4]  L. Regan,et al.  LIVE-PAINT allows super-resolution microscopy inside living cells using reversible peptide-protein interactions , 2020, Communications Biology.

[5]  Alexander H. Clowsley,et al.  Repeat DNA-PAINT suppresses background and non-specific signals in optical nanoscopy , 2020, Nature Communications.

[6]  P. Swain,et al.  A new method for post-translationally labeling proteins in live cells for fluorescence imaging and tracking , 2017, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[7]  John E Dueber,et al.  A Barcoding Strategy Enabling Higher-Throughput Library Screening by Microscopy. , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[8]  Laurent Cognet,et al.  Super-resolution microscopy approaches for live cell imaging. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[9]  D. Klenerman,et al.  The changing point-spread function: single-molecule-based super-resolution imaging , 2014, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[10]  C. Slayman,et al.  C-Terminal Truncations of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PMA1 H+-ATPase Have Major Impacts on Protein Conformation, Trafficking, Quality Control, and Function , 2013, Eukaryotic Cell.

[11]  P. Morsomme,et al.  Rapid Response of the Yeast Plasma Membrane Proteome to Salt Stress* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[12]  J. Huiskonen,et al.  Eisosome-driven plasma membrane organization is mediated by BAR domains , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[13]  M. Kaksonen,et al.  Reassessment of the role of plasma membrane domains in the regulation of vesicular traffic in yeast , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[14]  Yoshiaki Yano,et al.  Coiled-coil tag--probe system for quick labeling of membrane receptors in living cell. , 2008, ACS chemical biology.

[15]  U. Vinkemeier,et al.  Green fluorescent protein‐tagging reduces the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling specifically of unphosphorylated STAT1 , 2007, The FEBS journal.

[16]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[17]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[18]  A. Hagège,et al.  GFP expression in muscle cells impairs actin-myosin interactions: implications for cell therapy , 2006, Nature Methods.

[19]  Christian Eggeling,et al.  Breaking the diffraction barrier in fluorescence microscopy at low light intensities by using reversibly photoswitchable proteins. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  P. Jemth,et al.  The Kinetics of PDZ Domain-Ligand Interactions and Implications for the Binding Mechanism* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast , 2003, Nature.

[22]  K. Malínská,et al.  Visualization of protein compartmentation within the plasma membrane of living yeast cells. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[23]  R. N. Trelease,et al.  Overexpression and Mislocalization of a Tail‐Anchored GFP Redefines the Identity of Peroxisomal ER , 2003, Traffic.

[24]  Rolf Apweiler,et al.  Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane spanning regions , 2001, Bioinform..

[25]  M. Gustafsson Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy , 2000, Journal of microscopy.

[26]  H. Riezman,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Arc35p works through two genetically separable calmodulin functions to regulate the actin and tubulin cytoskeletons. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[27]  Rainer Heintzmann,et al.  Laterally modulated excitation microscopy: improvement of resolution by using a diffraction grating , 1999, European Conference on Biomedical Optics.

[28]  S. Hell,et al.  Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. , 1994, Optics letters.

[29]  C. Slayman,et al.  Transcriptional regulation by glucose of the yeast PMA1 gene encoding the plasma membrane H+‐ATPase , 1993, Yeast.

[30]  Ramón Serrano,et al.  Characterization of the plasma membrane ATPase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1978, Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry.