Carbon Dioxide Post-Combustion Capture: Solvent Technologies Overview, Status and Future Directions

One of the most promising approaches to tackle the high emission rate of carbon dioxide is the use of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology. This technology aims at capturing carbon dioxide from power stations and other industrial facilities, compressing, and then transporting it to underground storage locations. Three technological routes for carbon capture from power plants exist: pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxycombustion. Pre-combustion is the removal of the carbon element from fuel gas prior to combustion [1]. This process takes place in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plants and operates at high pressures for high concentrations of CO2. IGCC plants still face several obstacles to commercialization. For instance, only two IGCC demonstration plants are in operation in the power sector in the United States. The second option is oxy-fuel combustion, which involves the use of high purity oxygen (instead of air) for fuel combustion and produces a CO2/H2O stream from which water is easily condensed [2]. However, the air (or nitrogen-oxygen) separation step is considered a bottle-neck for this process due to its energy intensiveness and high capital and operational costs. Finally, postcombustion capture involves a highly energy intensive nitrogen-carbon dioxide separation step [3]. As an end-of-pipe technology, this process is easier to implement compared to the other capture routes. In this chapter, the focus will be placed on post-combustion capture technology due to its high maturity, ability to be retrofitted to existing power plants and operational flexibility in switching between capture and no-capture modes [4].

[1]  Chih-Hung Huang,et al.  A Review of CO2 Capture by Absorption and Adsorption , 2012 .

[2]  Jeong Won Kang,et al.  Analysis of the heat of reaction and regeneration in alkanolamine-CO2 system , 2011 .

[3]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Aqueous piperazine derivatives for CO2 capture: Accurate screening by a wetted wall column , 2011 .

[4]  Meihong Wang,et al.  Post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: A state-of-the-art review , 2011 .

[5]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Aqueous piperazine as the new standard for CO2 capture technology , 2011 .

[6]  L. K. Keong,et al.  Thermo Physical Analysis of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol Solvent for Carbon Dioxide Removal , 2011 .

[7]  C. Cormos Evaluation of power generation schemes based on hydrogen-fuelled combined cycle with carbon capture , 2011 .

[8]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Degradation of aqueous piperazine in carbon dioxide capture , 2010 .

[9]  B. Smit,et al.  Carbon dioxide capture: prospects for new materials. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[10]  Victor Rudolph,et al.  Assessment of postcombustion carbon capture technologies for power generation , 2010 .

[11]  Andreas Poullikkas,et al.  Assessment of oxyfuel power generation technologies , 2009 .

[12]  S. Su,et al.  Post combustion CO2 capture by carbon fibre monolithic adsorbents , 2009 .

[13]  Paitoon Tontiwachwuthikul,et al.  Evaluation of the Performance of Various Amine Based Solvents in an Optimized Multipurpose Technology Development Pilot Plant , 2009 .

[14]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Absorption and desorption rates of carbon dioxide with monoethanolamine and piperazine , 2009 .

[15]  D. Wagener,et al.  Carbon dioxide capture with concentrated, aqueous piperazine , 2009 .

[16]  Hans Hasse,et al.  Pilot plant experimental studies of post combustion CO2 capture by reactive absorption with MEA and new solvents , 2009 .

[17]  Takuya Hirata,et al.  Current status of MHI’s CO2 recovery technology and optimization of CO2 recovery plant with a PC fired power plant , 2009 .

[18]  Raymond Davy,et al.  Development of catalysts for fast, energy efficient post combustion capture of CO2 into water; an alternative to monoethanolamine (MEA) solvents , 2009 .

[19]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  MDEA/Piperazine as a solvent for CO2 capture , 2009 .

[20]  Yuichi Fujioka,et al.  Development of novel tertiary amine absorbents for CO2 capture , 2009 .

[21]  J. Gibbins,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage , 2008 .

[22]  A. Danner Health and Environmental Impacts , 2008 .

[23]  Prachi Singh,et al.  Structure and activity relationships for amine based CO2 absorbents-I , 2007 .

[24]  Ahmed Aboudheir,et al.  Kinetics of the absorption of CO2 into mixed aqueous loaded solutions of monoethanolamine and methyldiethanolamine , 2006 .

[25]  Costas Tsouris,et al.  Separation of CO2 from Flue Gas: A Review , 2005 .

[26]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Carbon dioxide absorption with aqueous potassium carbonate promoted by piperazine , 2004 .

[27]  Mir-Akbar Hessami,et al.  A study of methods of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration: the sustainability of a photosynthetic bioreactor approach , 2004 .

[28]  A. Veawab,et al.  Characterization and Comparison of the CO2 Absorption Performance into Single and Blended Alkanolamines in a Packed Column , 2004 .

[29]  Curt M. White,et al.  Degradation Pathways for Monoethanolamine in a CO2 Capture Facility , 2003 .

[30]  C. M. White,et al.  Separation and Capture of CO2 from Large Stationary Sources and Sequestration in Geological Formations—Coalbeds and Deep Saline Aquifers , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[31]  S. Yoon,et al.  Solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions of 2-amino-2-ethyl-1,3-propanediol , 2002 .

[32]  Henry W. Pennline,et al.  Study of CO2 Absorption and Desorption in a Packed Column , 2001 .

[33]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous piperazine: reaction kinetics, mass transfer and solubility , 2000 .

[34]  Alexander Wokaun,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies , 1999 .

[35]  Shuo Xu,et al.  Kinetics of the reaction of carbon dioxide with 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol solutions , 1996 .

[36]  Pierce W.F. Riemer,et al.  International perspectives and the results of carbon dioxide capture disposal and utilisation studies , 1995 .

[37]  Chris Hendriks,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Removal from Coal-Fired Power Plants , 1994 .

[38]  E. J. Stewart,et al.  Reduce amine plant solvent losses; Part 2 , 1994 .

[39]  R. Barchas,et al.  The Kerr-McGee/ABB Lummus Crest technology for the recovery of CO2 from stack gases , 1992 .

[40]  M. Sander,et al.  The Fluor Daniel® econamine FG process: Past experience and present day focus , 1992 .

[41]  Jerry A. Bullin,et al.  Selecting Amines for Sweetening Units , 1984 .

[42]  C. R. Pauley,et al.  N-ReN recovers CO/sub 2/ from flue gas economically , 1984 .

[43]  G. Sartori,et al.  Sterically hindered amines for carbon dioxide removal from gases , 1983 .

[44]  L. Kaplan Cost-saving process recovers CO/sub 2/ from power-plant flue gas , 1982 .

[45]  Chung-Sung Tan,et al.  Mixed Alkanolamines with Low Regeneration Energy for CO2 Capture in a Rotating Packed Bed , 2013 .

[46]  Alexander K. Voice,et al.  Carbon Capture with 4 m Piperazine/4 m 2-Methylpiperazine , 2013 .

[47]  W.P.M. van Swaaij,et al.  Energy Efficient Solvents for CO2 Absorption from Flue Gas: Vapor Liquid Equilibrium and Pilot Plant Study☆ , 2013 .

[48]  Satoshi Saito,et al.  Novel hindered amine absorbent for CO2 capture , 2013 .

[49]  R. Weiland,et al.  CO2 Removal from Syngas Using Piperazine-Activated MDEA and Potassium Dimethyl Glycinate , 2012 .

[50]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Stripper configurations for CO2 capture by aqueous monoethanolamine and piperazine , 2011 .

[51]  Yuichi Fujioka,et al.  Synthesis and selection of hindered new amine absorbents for CO2 capture , 2011 .

[52]  Hans Hasse,et al.  Pilot plant experiments for post combustion carbon dioxide capture by reactive absorption with novel solvents , 2011 .

[53]  Takashi Sugiura,et al.  Hitachi’s carbon dioxide scrubbing technology with new absorbent for coal fired power plants , 2011 .

[54]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Modeling pilot plant results for CO2 capture by aqueous piperazine , 2011 .

[55]  S. Kazama,et al.  Synthesis and selection of new amine absorbents for CO2 capture , 2011 .

[56]  M. Rameshni Carbon Capture Overview , 2010 .

[57]  Jong-Hyeon Jung,et al.  Removal characteristics of CO2 using aqueous MEA/AMP solutions in the absorption and regeneration process. , 2009, Journal of environmental sciences.

[58]  Jerry Meldon,et al.  Advanced Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture , 2009 .

[59]  C. Bouallou,et al.  Kinetics of Carbon Dioxide Absorption into Aqueous Solution of a Polyamine , 2008 .

[60]  Byoung-Moo Min,et al.  Absorption rates of CO2 into aqueous mixtures of MDEA (methyldiethanolamine) and HMDA (hexamethylenediamine) , 2005 .

[61]  B. Metz IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[62]  Sholeh Ma’mun,et al.  Selection of new absorbents for carbon dioxide capture , 2004 .

[63]  R. Lensen The promoter eect of piperazine on the removal of carbon dioxide , 2004 .

[64]  M. Aresta,et al.  NEW AMINES FOR CARBON DIOXIDE SEPARATION FROM GAS-MIXTURES , 2003 .

[65]  Boshu He,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Recovery from Flue Gases By Ammonia Scrubbing , 2003 .

[66]  Amornvadee Veawab,et al.  Performance and Cost Analysis for CO2 Capture from Flue Gas Streams: Absorption and Regeneration Aspects , 2003 .

[67]  Hiroshi Tanaka,et al.  Recent Developments on Flue Gas CO2 Recovery Technology , 2003 .

[68]  S. Freguia,et al.  Research Results for CO2 Capture from Flue Gas by Aqueous Absorption/Stripping , 2002 .

[69]  Amornvadee Veawab,et al.  ABSORPTION PERFORMANCE OF AQUEOUS ALKANOLAMINES IN PACKED COLUMNS , 2002 .

[70]  D. G. Chapel,et al.  Recovery of CO 2 from Flue Gases : Commercial Trends , 2001 .

[71]  S. Chakravarti,et al.  Advanced Technology for the Capture of Carbon Dioxide from Flue Gases , 2001 .

[72]  A. Veawab,et al.  Solvent Formulation for CO 2 Separation from Flue Gas Streams , 2001 .

[73]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  The economics of CO2 capture , 1999 .