Groundwater phosphate dynamics in a river riparian zone: effects of hydrologic flowpaths, lithology and redox chemistry

This study examines the influence of riparian zone hydrology, lithology and redox chemistry on groundwater phosphate dynamics. Patterns of soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), dissolved oxygen (DO) and ferrous iron (Fe2+) in combination with hydrologic data and sediment characteristics were studied in a forested floodplain connected to a large upland sand aquifer in an agricultural region of southern Ontario, Canada. Groundwater discharge from the upland aquifer flowed laterally beneath peat in a 2–4 m thick zone of permeable sands across the floodplain to the river. Within the sands, low SRP concentrations ( 3 mg L−1 and Fe2+ concentrations <0.2 mg L−1 which extended for a horizontal distance of 100–140 m across the riparian zone. High SRP concentrations (50–950 μg L−1) were associated with low DO and high Fe2+ concentrations which exceeded 1 mg L−1 in buried channel sediments near the river bank. Sediment P fractionation indicated that the buried channel sediments contained a much higher pool of total P and Fe+Al–P than the sands. Groundwater SRP concentrations at the river bank were 25–80 μg L−1 compared to <10 μg L−1 in river water indicating that the floodplain was a source of SRP to the river. Areas of elevated SRP and Fe2+ within the floodplain expanded in August when DO concentrations in groundwater were lower than in late spring or autumn. These data suggest that the microbial reduction of Fe3+ to soluble Fe2+ in anaerobic conditions influences groundwater SRP concentrations in the riparian zone. This study shows that well-organized patterns of groundwater SRP concentrations occur in riparian zones which reflect the interaction of hydrologic flowpaths and environments of different redox state. Internal sources of P associated with buried channel sediments can also influence subsurface SRP transport and release to streams.

[1]  C. Richardson,et al.  Mechanisms Controlling Phosphorus Retention Capacity in Freshwater Wetlands , 1985, Science.

[2]  F. Swanson,et al.  An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian ZonesFocus on links between land and water , 1991 .

[3]  S. Bailey,et al.  Buffer zones to improve water quality: a review of their potential use in UK agriculture , 1993 .

[4]  J. W. Gilliam,et al.  Sediment and Chemical Load Reduction by Grass and Riparian Filters , 1996 .

[5]  Saied Mostaghimi,et al.  Evaluation of vegetative filter strips as a best management practice for feed lots , 1988 .

[6]  K. Devito,et al.  Phosphorus and nitrogen retention in five Precambrian shield wetlands , 1989 .

[7]  I. H. Öğüş,et al.  NATO ASI Series , 1997 .

[8]  W. Mitsch Global wetlands: old world and new , 1994 .

[9]  Alan R. Hill,et al.  Nitrate dynamics in relation to lithology and hydrologic flow path in a river riparian zone. , 2000 .

[10]  Saied Mostaghimi,et al.  Vegetative Filter Strips for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Control , 1989 .

[11]  H. Furumai,et al.  Fractional Composition of Phosphorus Forms in Sediments Related to Release , 1982 .

[12]  Brian P. Kennedy,et al.  THERMODYNAMIC CONSTRAINTS ON NITROGEN TRANSFORMATIONS AND OTHER BIOGEOCHEMICAL PROCESSES AT SOIL-STREAM INTERFACES , 1998 .

[13]  W. Alley Regional ground-water quality , 1993 .

[14]  P. M. Gale,et al.  Phosphorus Retention in Streams and Wetlands: A Review , 1999 .

[15]  David A. Kovacic,et al.  Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water‐quality restoration and stream management , 1993 .

[16]  D. Weller,et al.  Nutrient Interception by a Riparian Forest Receiving Inputs from Adjacent Cropland , 1993 .

[17]  A. Hill Nitrate Distribution in the Ground Water of the Alliston Region of Ontario, Canada , 1982 .

[18]  D. Correll,et al.  Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest , 1984 .

[19]  L. Lijklema,et al.  Fractionation of inorganic phosphates in calcareous sediments. , 1980 .

[20]  R. Naiman,et al.  The Ecology of Interfaces: Riparian Zones , 1997 .

[21]  Joseph S. Meyer,et al.  Contribution of bacteria to release and fixation of phosphorus in lake sediments , 1988 .

[22]  Peter J. Dillon,et al.  The influence of hydrologic conditions and peat oxia on the phosphorus and nitrogen dynamics of a conifer swamp , 1993 .

[23]  E. Turtola,et al.  The interactions of buffer zones and phosphorus runoff , 1996 .

[24]  Clifford H. Mortimer,et al.  THE EXCHANGE OF DISSOLVED SUBSTANCES BETWEEN MUD AND WATER IN LAKES, II , 1941 .

[25]  K. R. Reddy,et al.  Role of Eh and pH on Phosphorus Geochemistry in Sediments of Lake Okeechobee, Florida. , 1994, Journal of environmental quality.

[26]  E. Roden,et al.  Phosphate mobilization in iron-rich anaerobic sediments : microbial Fe(III) oxide reduction versus iron-sulfide formation , 1997 .

[27]  Alan R. Hill,et al.  Nitrate Removal in Stream Riparian Zones , 1996 .

[28]  Patrick J. Mulholland,et al.  Regulation of nutrient concentrations in a temperate forest stream: Roles of upland, riparian, and instream processes , 1992 .

[29]  K. Devito,et al.  Subsurface denitrification in a forest riparianzone: Interactions between hydrology and supplies ofnitrate and organic carbon , 2000 .

[30]  Brian P. Kennedy,et al.  THERMODYNAMIC CONSTRAINTS ON NITROGENTRANSFORMATIONS AND OTHER BIOGEOCHEMICALPROCESSES AT SOIL–STREAM INTERFACES , 1998 .

[31]  Jean O. Lacoursière,et al.  Nutrient retention in riparian ecotones , 1994 .

[32]  A. Cooper,et al.  Effects of riparian set-aside on soil characteristics in an agricultural landscape: Implications for nutrient transport and retention , 1995 .