Authentication of African green monkey cell lines using human short tandem repeat markers

BackgroundTools for authenticating cell lines are critical for quality control in cell-based biological experiments. Currently there are methods to authenticate human cell lines using short tandem repeat (STR) markers based on the technology and procedures successfully used in the forensic community for human identification, but there are no STR based methods for authenticating nonhuman cell lines to date. There is significant homology between the human and vervet monkey genome and we utilized these similarities to design the first multiplex assay based on human STR markers for vervet cell line identification.ResultsThe following STR markers were incorporated into the vervet multiplex PCR assay: D17S1304, D5S1467, D19S245, D1S518, D8S1106, D4S2408, D6S1017, and DYS389. The eight markers were successful in uniquely identifying sixty-two vervet monkey DNA samples and confirmed that Vero76 cells and COS-7 cells were derived from Vero and CV-1 cells, respectively. The multiplex assay shows specificity for vervet DNA within the determined allele range for vervet monkeys; however, the primers will also amplify human DNA for each marker resulting in amplicons outside the vervet allele range in several of the loci. The STR markers showed genetic stability in over sixty-nine passages of Vero cells, suggesting low mutation rates in the targeted STR sequences in the Vero cell line.ConclusionsA functional vervet multiplex assay consisting of eight human STR markers with heterozygosity values ranging from 0.53-0.79 was successful in uniquely identifying sixty-two vervet monkey samples. The probability of a random match using these eight markers between any two vervet samples is approximately 1 in 1.9 million. While authenticating a vervet cell line, the multiplex assay may also be a useful indicator for human cell line contamination since the assay is based on human STR markers.

[1]  S Rozen,et al.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. , 2000, Methods in molecular biology.

[2]  G. Stacey,et al.  Cell contamination leads to inaccurate data: we must take action now , 2000, Nature.

[3]  W. Nelson-Rees,et al.  Cross-contamination of cells in culture. , 1981, Science.

[4]  Amanda Capes-Davis,et al.  Check your cultures! A list of cross‐contaminated or misidentified cell lines , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[5]  Y. Gluzman SV40-transformed simian cells support the replication of early SV40 mutants , 1981, Cell.

[6]  H. Ehrlich,et al.  Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of a Vero-cell-culture-derived trivalent influenza vaccine: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[7]  P. Walsh,et al.  Sequence analysis and characterization of stutter products at the tetranucleotide repeat locus vWA. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Rhitu Chatterjee,et al.  Cases of Mistaken Identity , 2007, Science.

[9]  S. Nakagawa,et al.  Highly polymorphic STR marker amplified with human DYS389 primers in Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) , 2006, American journal of primatology.

[10]  Thomas J. Hudson,et al.  A genetic linkage map of the vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) , 2007, Mammalian Genome.

[11]  Y. Reid Characterization and authentication of cancer cell lines: an overview. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[12]  Masters,et al.  Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end , 2010 .

[13]  S. Gartler,et al.  Apparent HeLa Cell Contamination of Human Heteroploid Cell Lines , 1968, Nature.

[14]  American Type Culture Collection Standards Development Orga ASN-0002 Cell line misidentification: the beginning of the end , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[15]  Neutral Red Assay for Measurement of Quantitative Vero Cell Cytotoxicity , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[16]  R. Webster,et al.  Replication of influenza A viruses in a green monkey kidney continuous cell line (Vero). , 1995, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[17]  B. Montagnon Polio and rabies vaccines produced in continuous cell lines: a reality for Vero cell line. , 1989, Developments in biological standardization.

[18]  J. Butler,et al.  A 26plex Autosomal STR Assay to Aid Human Identity Testing * † , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[19]  Sudhir Varma,et al.  DNA fingerprinting of the NCI-60 cell line panel , 2009, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[20]  田中 俊典 National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) , 2012 .

[21]  Gertrude Case Buehring,et al.  Cell line cross-contamination: How aware are mammalian cell culturists of the problem and how to monitor it? , 2004, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[22]  Stefan Schmidt,et al.  Cancer cell line identification by short tandem repeat profiling: power and limitations , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[23]  Wilhelm G Dirks,et al.  Online verification of human cell line identity by STR DNA typing. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[24]  John M. Butler,et al.  STRBase: a short tandem repeat DNA database for the human identity testing community , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  P. Ikonomi,et al.  Short tandem repeat profiling: part of an overall strategy for reducing the frequency of cell misidentification , 2010, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[26]  Michael D Coble,et al.  Characterization of new miniSTR loci to aid analysis of degraded DNA. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[27]  Amanda Capes-Davis,et al.  Recommendation of short tandem repeat profiling for authenticating human cell lines, stem cells, and tissues , 2010, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[28]  John M. Butler,et al.  Forensic DNA Typing: Biology, Technology, and Genetics of STR Markers , 2001 .

[29]  J. Carpten,et al.  Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. , 1996, BioTechniques.

[30]  清水 文七,et al.  Vero cells : origin, properties and biomedical applications , 1988 .

[31]  B. Fanget,et al.  The large-scale cultivation of VERO cells in micro-carrier culture for virus vaccine production. Preliminary results for killed poliovirus vaccine. , 1981, Developments in biological standardization.

[32]  J. Moulin,et al.  Qualification of working cell banks for the Vero cell line to produce licensed human vaccines. , 1989, Developments in biological standardization.

[33]  R. Nardone Curbing rampant cross-contamination and misidentification of cell lines. , 2008, BioTechniques.

[34]  J. Rogers,et al.  Effectiveness of human microsatellite loci for assessing paternity in a captive colony of vervets (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) , 2002, American journal of primatology.

[35]  A. Multani,et al.  Human tumor xenografts in nude mice are not always of human origin , 1998, Cancer.

[36]  Stephen Frosh,et al.  Identity crisis , 2015, Science.

[37]  Edmund Chiong,et al.  The use of short tandem repeat profiling to characterize human bladder cancer cell lines. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[38]  J. Butler,et al.  AutoDimer: a screening tool for primer-dimer and hairpin structures. , 2004, BioTechniques.

[39]  M. Halter,et al.  A mechanistically relevant cytotoxicity assay based on the detection of cellular GFP. , 2009 .

[40]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Henrietta Lacks, HeLa cells, and cell culture contamination. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[41]  J A Thomson,et al.  Short tandem repeat profiling provides an international reference standard for human cell lines , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  S. Langdon,et al.  Characterization and authentication of cancer cell lines: an overview. , 2004, Methods in molecular medicine.

[43]  Michael D Coble,et al.  Characterization of 26 MiniSTR Loci for Improved Analysis of Degraded DNA Samples , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.