Early invasive cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and clinical examination, verified by pathologic results, in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 Intergroup Study.

PURPOSE To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and clinical examination for delineating early cervical cancer and for measuring tumor size. PATIENTS AND METHODS A 25-center study enrolled 208 patients with biopsy-proven invasive cervical cancer for MRI and CT before attempted curative radical hysterectomy. Each imaging study was interpreted prospectively by one onsite radiologist and retrospectively by four independent offsite radiologists, who were all blinded to surgical, histopathologic, and other imaging findings. Likelihood of cervical stromal and uterine body involvement was rated on a 5-point scale. Tumor size measurements were attempted in three axes. Surgical pathology was the standard of reference. RESULTS Neither MRI nor CT was accurate for evaluating cervical stroma. For uterine body involvement, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was higher for MRI than for CT for both prospective (0.80 v 0.66, respectively; P = .01) and retrospective (0.68 v 0.57, respectively; P = .02) readings. Retrospective readers could measure diameter by CT in 35% to 73% of patients and by MRI in 79% to 94% of patients. Prospective readers had the highest Spearman correlation coefficient with pathologic measurement for MRI (r(s) = 0.54), followed by CT (r(s) = 0.45) and clinical examination (r(s) = 0.37; P < .0001 for all). Spearman correlation of multiobserver diameter measurements for MRI (r(s) = 0.58; P < .0001) was double that for CT (r(s) = 0.27; P = .03). CONCLUSION In patients with cervical cancer, MRI is superior to CT and clinical examination for evaluating uterine body involvement and measuring tumor size, but no method was accurate for evaluating cervical stroma.

[1]  A. Staudach,et al.  Prognostic factors in surgically treated stage ib-iib cervical carcinomas with special emphasis on the importance of tumor volume. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[2]  R. Mortel,et al.  Analysis of factors contributing to treatment failures in stages IB and IIA carcinoma of the cervix. , 1980, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  J. Schilder,et al.  Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy in primary cancer of the cervix , 1999, Current oncology reports.

[4]  Chi-Chun Lai,et al.  Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of cervix after primary radiotherapy , 2003 .

[5]  T. Wiegel,et al.  Radiation therapy of para-aortic lymph nodes in cancer of the uterine cervix. , 1993, Acta oncologica.

[6]  M. Hirokawa,et al.  Negative MRI findings with invasive cervical biopsy may indicate stage IA cervical carcinoma. , 2000, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  B. Corn,et al.  Phase I/II study of concomitant irradiation and carboplatin for locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix: an interim report. , 1996, American journal of clinical oncology.

[8]  J C Ehrhardt,et al.  Tumor perfusion studies using fast magnetic resonance imaging technique in advanced cervical cancer: a new noninvasive predictive assay. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  R. Kurman,et al.  Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: A gynecologic oncology group study , 1991 .

[10]  P. Disaia,et al.  Carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation therapy I. A multi‐variate analysis of prognostic variables in the gynecologic oncology group , 1991, Cancer.

[11]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Estimating and comparing diagnostic tests' accuracy when the gold standard is not binary. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[12]  R. McGhee,et al.  Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  J C Ehrhardt,et al.  Usefulness of tumor volumetry by magnetic resonance imaging in assessing response to radiation therapy in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  W. Fowler,et al.  Computed tomography: does it really improve the treatment of cervical carcinoma? , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  M. Cobby,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix. , 1990, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  P. Parizel,et al.  The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma , 2003, European Radiology.

[17]  T. Pulay,et al.  Prediction of cervical infiltration in Stage II endometrial cancer by different preoperative evaluation techniques (D&C, US, CT, MRI). , 2003, European journal of gynaecological oncology.

[18]  John M Buatti,et al.  Method and timing of tumor volume measurement for outcome prediction in cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Dose and volume parameters for MRI-based treatment planning in intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  C. Belloni,et al.  Carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Intercomparison of treatment concepts for MR image assisted brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma based on GYN GEC-ESTRO recommendations. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  G. Vorgias,et al.  Preoperative imaging of primary intra-abdominal gynaecological malignancies. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-scan and MRI. A Greek cohort study. , 2002, European journal of gynaecological oncology.

[23]  H. Hricak,et al.  Cervical Carcinoma: Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Staging , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  H. Hricak,et al.  Utilization of diagnostic studies in the pretreatment evaluation of invasive cervical cancer in the United States: results of intergroup protocol ACRIN 6651/GOG 183. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  P. Grigsby,et al.  Imaging in cervical cancer , 2003, Cancer.

[26]  K. Hamamoto,et al.  Patterns of failure and survival in locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with high dose-rate intracavitary irradiation system. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  J. Schilder,et al.  Stage Ia-IIa cancer of the cervix. , 2003, Cancer journal.

[28]  B. Monk,et al.  Cervical cancer with paraaortic metastases: significance of residual paraaortic disease after surgical staging. , 1998, Gynecologic oncology.

[29]  N. deSouza,et al.  Pretreatment tumour volume measurement on high‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of survival in cervical cancer , 2004, BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[30]  H. Ahn,et al.  The value of cystoscopy and intravenous urography after magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography in the staging of cervical carcinoma. , 2001, Yonsei medical journal.

[31]  M. Plante,et al.  Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. An updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature. , 2004, Gynecologic oncology.

[32]  C. Ling,et al.  Carcinoma of the cervix: patterns of care studies: review of 1978, 1983, and 1988-1989 surveys. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  Silvia D. Chang,et al.  Proposed guidelines for image-based intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma: report from Image-Guided Brachytherapy Working Group. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[34]  M. Rotman,et al.  Radiation therapy with and without extrafascial hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma: a randomized trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. , 2003, Gynecologic oncology.

[35]  R. Valicenti,et al.  Concomitant irradiation and dose-escalating carboplatin for locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix: an updated report. , 1998, American journal of clinical oncology.

[36]  R. Lanciano,et al.  Optimizing radiation parameters for cervical cancer. , 2000, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[37]  J C Ehrhardt,et al.  Tumor size evaluated by pelvic examination compared with 3-D quantitative analysis in the prediction of outcome for cervical cancer. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[38]  W T Yuh,et al.  MR microcirculation assessment in cervical cancer: Correlations with histomorphological tumor markers and clinical outcome , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[39]  Prognostic value of age and histologic type in neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery for bulky (≥4 cm) stage IB and IIA cervical carcinoma , 2003, International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society.

[40]  Relation between FIGO stage, primary tumor volume, and presence of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients referred for radiotherapy , 2003, International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society.

[41]  F. Fazio,et al.  Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT. , 2006, Radiology.

[42]  I. Isherwood,et al.  Staging, volume estimation and assessment of nodal status in carcinoma of the cervix: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with surgical findings. , 1994, Clinical radiology.

[43]  R. Kimmig,et al.  Parametrial invasion in cervical carcinoma: evaluation of detection at MR imaging with fat suppression. , 1998, Radiology.

[44]  P. Rose,et al.  Combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix. , 2001, Cancer journal.

[45]  N. Mayr,et al.  Postoperative radiation therapy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer: corpus, cervical, and lower uterine segment involvement--patterns of failure. , 1995, Radiology.

[46]  S. Chambers,et al.  Parametrial Involvement, Regardless of Nodal Status: A Poor Prognostic Factor for Cervical Cancer , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[47]  J. Reiber,et al.  Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[48]  K. Ogawa,et al.  Comparison of prognostic value of MRI and FIGO stage among patients with cervical carcinoma treated with radiotherapy. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[49]  H. Hricak,et al.  Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up--cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis. , 1996, Radiology.

[50]  J C Ehrhardt,et al.  Prediction of tumor control in patients with cervical cancer: analysis of combined volume and dynamic enhancement pattern by MR imaging. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[51]  S. Sironi,et al.  Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness. , 1993, Radiology.

[52]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[53]  B. Sevin,et al.  Prospective surgical-pathological study of disease-free interval in patients with stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 1990, Gynecologic oncology.

[54]  Christian Kirisits,et al.  Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[55]  Ji-Hong Hong,et al.  The prognostic factors for patients with early cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy and postoperative radiotherapy. , 1999, Gynecologic oncology.

[56]  R. Azumi,et al.  Stromal invasion by carcinoma of the cervix: assessment with dynamic MR imaging. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[57]  C. Kosary FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age and race as prognostic factors in determining survival for cancers of the female gynecological system: an analysis of 1973-87 SEER cases of cancers of the endometrium, cervix, ovary, vulva, and vagina. , 1994, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[58]  R. J. Johnson,et al.  Predictive value of clinical examination, transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging prior to radiotherapy in carcinoma of the cervix. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.