Assessment of the axial rotation of the pelvis with the EOS® imaging system: intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and accuracy study

PurposeA source of radiological bias occurs when the axial rotation of the pelvis is disregarded in hip and spine biomechanics analyses. The EOS imaging system (EOS Imaging, France) offers the possibility of detecting and measuring the axial rotation of bones. Reproducibility and accuracy have not been documented in the case of the pelvis.MethodsA dry pelvis has been X-rayed with the EOS system every 5° from 30° left to 30° right according to a laser line reference goniometer. Three observers have measured the rotation. One observer did it 3 times. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and the accuracy have been calculated using the root mean square standard deviation calculation. The relationship between the axial rotation and the offset between the left and right acetabulae on the lateral view was investigated.ResultsThe 95 % CI was ±0.23° for the intra-observer and ±0.33° for the inter-observer reliability. The mean of signed differences between the software calculation and the actual axial rotation of the pelvis was −0.39° (SD 0.77°). The lateral acetabular offset was proportional to the sin of the rotation. Approximately, 30 mm offset corresponded to about 10° rotation.ConclusionsThe 3D slot scanning imaging system demonstrated significant reproducibility and accuracy for the assessment of the axial rotation of the pelvis.

[1]  David Mitton,et al.  Fast accurate stereoradiographic 3D-reconstruction of the spine using a combined geometric and statistic model. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  Wafa Skalli,et al.  Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  W. Skalli,et al.  [A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system]. , 2005, Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine.

[4]  Georges Charpak,et al.  Une nouvelle imagerie Ostéo-Articulaire basse dose en position debout : le système EOS , 2005 .

[5]  W Skalli,et al.  Reproducibility of Measuring the Shape and Three-Dimensional Position of Cervical Vertebrae in Upright Position Using the EOS Stereoradiography System , 2007, Spine.

[6]  P. Boyer,et al.  Acetabular Anteversion with CT in Supine, Simulated Standing, and Sitting Positions in a THA Patient Population , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  W. Skalli,et al.  The EOS imaging system for understanding a patellofemoral disorder following THR. , 2011, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[8]  S. Laporte,et al.  Three-dimensional assessment of the intervertebral kinematics after Mobi-C total disc replacement at the cervical spine in vivo using the EOS stereoradiography system , 2011, International Journal of Spine Surgery.

[9]  M. Rousseau,et al.  Pelvis and total hip arthroplasty acetabular component orientations in sitting and standing positions: measurements reproductibility with EOS imaging system versus conventional radiographies. , 2011, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[10]  M. Rousseau,et al.  Hip–spine relations and sagittal balance clinical consequences , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[11]  P. Newton,et al.  Comparison of 3-Dimensional Spinal Reconstruction Accuracy: Biplanar Radiographs With EOS Versus Computed Tomography , 2012, Spine.