Deriving Narrow Syntax through constraints on information structure: A parallel between linguistic models of displacement and database theory

This paper presents a research program for normalization-driven syntax. It takes the Minimalist research agenda as a starting point (Chomsky, 1995b) and explores the question of how the CI interface determines syntactic operations. The proposal provides specific content to the notion of bare output conditions and the nature of the CI interface. It does so by drawing on the tools provided by Relational Theory, a branch of set-theoretic mathematics, and Database Theory, a branch of computer science. It is demonstrated that core components of Narrow Syntax (phrase structure, selection and AGREE) are all definable in terms of Relational Theory. Then, it is shown that the process of relation optimization, or normalization, can derive chain formation. The article concludes with two speculations on the implementation of phases within a normalization-driven grammar and the implications of such a system for the learnability of the lexicon.

[1]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[2]  J. Russell,et al.  Logical versus Associative Performance on Transitive Reasoning Tasks by Children: Implications for the Status of Animals Performance , 1996 .

[3]  Susan Carey,et al.  Spontaneous number representation in semi–free–ranging rhesus monkeys , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  A. Watanabe.  Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ , 1992 .

[5]  H. Harley,et al.  Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis , 2002 .

[6]  G. Cinque.  Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective , 1999 .

[7]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger , 1993 .

[8]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[9]  Elizabeth A. Cowper.  The Geometry of Interpretable Features: Infl in English and Spanish , 2005 .

[10]  J. Bobaljik,et al.  A-Chains At The Pf-Interface: Copies And `Covert Movement , 2002 .

[11]  Douglas J. Gillan,et al.  Reasoning in the Chimpanzee: I. Analogical Reasoning , 1981 .

[12]  Michael Stonebraker,et al.  Readings in Database Systems , 1988 .

[13]  Richard Hudson,et al.  English word grammar , 1995 .

[14]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Minimalist inquiries : the framework , 1998 .

[15]  David M. Kroenke,et al.  Database Processing: Fundamentals, Design, Implementation , 1991 .

[16]  Alan F. Dutka,et al.  Fundamentals of data normalization , 1989 .

[17]  David Lebeaux,et al.  Language acquisition and the form of the grammar , 2000 .

[18]  C. Allen.  Transitive inference in animals: Reasoning or conditioned associations? , 2006 .

[19]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[20]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Nature and Language , 2002 .

[21]  N. Hornstein.  Movement and Control , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[22]  F. E..  A Relational Model of Data Large Shared Data Banks , 2000 .

[23]  Richard S. Kayne.  Overt vs. Covert Movements , 1998 .

[24]  Pierre Pica.  On the Nature of the Reflexivization Cycle , 1987 .

[25]  Noam Chomsky.  A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[26]  M. Giurfa,et al.  A test of transitive inferences in free-flying honeybees: unsuccessful performance due to memory constraints. , 2004, Learning & memory.

[27]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Bare Phrase Structure , 1994 .

[28]  Guillermo Paz-y-Miño C,et al.  Pinyon jays use transitive inference to predict social dominance , 2004, Nature.

[29]  K. Hale,et al.  Ken Hale: A Life in Language , 2001 .

[30]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[31]  C.J.W. Zwart,et al.  Issues relating to a derivational theory of binding , 2002 .

[32]  L. Breslow.  Reevaluation of the Literature on the Development of Transitive Inferences. , 1981 .

[33]  T. Zentall.  The case for a cognitive approach to animal learning and behavior , 2001, Behavioural Processes.

[34]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Transitive Inferences and Memory in Young Children , 1971, Nature.

[35]  Jonathan David Bobaljik,et al.  Realizing Germanic Inflection: Why Morphology Does Not Drive Syntax , 2002 .

[36]  J. Vonk.  Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and orangutan (Pongo abelii) understanding of first- and second-order relations , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[37]  Gert Webelhuth,et al.  Government and binding theory and the minimalist program : principles and parameters in syntactic theory , 1997 .

[38]  C De Lillio,et al.  The serial organisation of behaviour by non-human primates; an evaluation of experimental paradigms. , 1996, Behavioural brain research.

[39]  E A Wasserman,et al.  Same-different conceptualization by baboons (Papio papio): the role of entropy. , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[40]  Alice G. B. ter Meulen,et al.  The representation of (in)definiteness , 1989 .

[41]  W. W. Armstrong,et al.  Dependency Structures of Data Base Relationships , 1974, IFIP Congress.

[42]  Richard S. Kayne.  Movement and silence , 2005 .

[43]  Carlo De Lillo,et al.  Review article , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  Robert A. Chametzky,et al.  Phrase Structure: From Gb to Minimalism , 2000 .

[45]  S. Pinker.  The language instinct : the new science of language and mind , 1994 .

[46]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  Cognition: Numerical memory span in a chimpanzee , 2000, Nature.

[47]  K. Devlin.  The joy of sets : fundamentals of contemporary set theory , 1993 .

[48]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[49]  Alec Marantz,et al.  No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon , 1997 .

[50]  A. Wright,et al.  Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[51]  eljko Bokovi,et al.  On Multiple Wh-Fronting , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[52]  T. Reinhart.  Wh-in-situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program , 1998 .

[53]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .

[54]  Jairo Nunes.  Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement , 2004 .

[55]  Juan Uriagereka.  Multiple spell-out , 2005 .

[56]  Richard S. Kayne.  Connectedness and binary branching , 1984 .

[57]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP , 2002 .

[58]  B. McGonigle,et al.  Are monkeys logical? , 1977, Nature.

[59]  E. F. Codd,et al.  A relational model of data for large shared data banks , 1970, CACM.

[60]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Primate cognition: from ‘what now?’ to ‘what if?’ , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  D. Gillan.  Reasoning in the chimpanzee: II. Transitive inference. , 1981 .

[62]  P. Halmos.  Naive Set Theory , 1961 .

[63]  David Pesetsky,et al.  T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences , 2000 .

[64]  Eric Reuland,et al.  Long-distance anaphora: Index , 1991 .

[65]  C.-T. James Huang,et al.  Long-distance anaphora: The local nature of the long-distance reflexive in Chinese , 1991 .

[66]  Richard S. Kayne.  The Antisymmetry of Syntax , 1994 .

[67]  Veneeta Dayal,et al.  Single-Pair versus Multiple-Pair Answers: Wh-in-Situ and Scope , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[68]  Kenneth Webb,et al.  Evolution of Communication Simulation of Adaptive Behavior – Project Report , 2004 .

[69]  N. Geschwind.  Language and the brain. , 1972, Scientific American.

[70]  Denise Brandão de Oliveira e Britto,et al.  The faculty of language , 2007 .

[71]  Jan-Wouter Zwart.  Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program , 2002 .

[72]  T. Reinhart,et al.  Long-distance anaphora: Anaphors and logophors: an argument structure perspective , 1991 .

[73]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[74]  Roger K. R. Thompson,et al.  Categorical perception and conceptual judgments by nonhuman primates: the paleological monkey and the analogical ape , 2000, Cogn. Sci..

[75]  P. Cole.  Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives , 1990 .

[76]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  An Equivalence Between Relational Database Dependencies and a Fragment of Propositional Logic , 1981, JACM.