Adding an Online Community to an Internet-Mediated Walking Program. Part 2: Strategies for Encouraging Community Participation

Starting a new online community with a limited number of members who have not self-selected for participation in the community is challenging. The space must appear active to lure visitors to return; when the pool of participants is small, a large fraction must be converted from lurkers to contributors, and contributors must receive responses quickly to encourage continued participation. We report on strategies for overcoming these challenges and our experience implementing them within an online community add-on to an existing Internet-mediated walking program. Concentrated study recruitment increased the effective membership size. Having few conversation spaces rather than many specialized ones, staff seeding of the forums before members were invited to visit, and staff posting of new topics when there were conversation lulls, all helped to make the forums appear active. In retrospect, using even fewer separate spaces and displaying a flat rather than nested reply structure would have made the forums appear even more active. Contests with small prizes around participation in the forums and around meeting walking goals generated a lot of discussion; a contest for first-time posters was especially effective at moving lurkers to post. Staff efforts to elicit participation by asking questions had mixed success. Staff replies to posts that had not received member replies created a feeling of responsiveness despite limited membership.

[1]  H. Reis,et al.  Attraction and close relationships. , 1998 .

[2]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  The Rhetorical Dynamics of Gender Harassment On-Line , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[3]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  The network communities of SeniorNet , 1999, ECSCW.

[4]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Empathic communities: balancing emotional and factual communication , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[5]  A. Rustichini,et al.  Pay Enough or Don't Pay at All , 2000 .

[6]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[7]  White Mh,et al.  Online support for caregivers. Analysis of an Internet Alzheimer mailgroup. , 2000 .

[8]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Lurker demographics: counting the silent , 2000, CHI.

[9]  Lynne Lamberg,et al.  Online Empathy for Mood Disorders , 2003 .

[10]  A. Rai-Chaudhuri,et al.  International online discussion lists on chronic myelogenous leukaemia , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Think different: increasing online community participation using uniqueness and group dissimilarity , 2004, CHI.

[12]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Experiment 1 : Motivating Conversational Contributions Through Group Homogeneity and Individual Uniqueness , 2010 .

[13]  J. Powell,et al.  Primary care Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups : systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions , 2004 .

[14]  J. Lasker,et al.  The Role of an Online Community for People With a Rare Disease: Content Analysis of Messages Posted on a Primary Biliary Cirrhosis Mailinglist , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community , 2005, GROUP.

[16]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game , 2006, UbiComp.

[17]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities , 2006, CHI.

[18]  Paul Dourish,et al.  UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing, 8th International Conference, UbiComp 2006, Orange County, CA, USA, September 17-21, 2006 , 2006, UbiComp.

[19]  John Riedl,et al.  Using intelligent task routing and contribution review to help communities build artifacts of lasting value , 2006, CHI.

[20]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  Virtual “Third Places”: A Case Study of Sociability in Massively Multiplayer Games , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[21]  Nancy Baym,et al.  The new shape of online community: The example of Swedish independent music fandom , 2007, First Monday.

[22]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities , 2007 .

[23]  F. Maxwell Harper,et al.  Social Comparisons to Motivate Contributions to an Online Community , 2007, PERSUASIVE.

[24]  John Riedl,et al.  SuggestBot: using intelligent task routing to help people find work in wikipedia , 2007, IUI '07.

[25]  Yang Wang,et al.  A hybrid cultural ecology: world of warcraft in China , 2008, CSCW.

[26]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Changes in use and perception of facebook , 2008, CSCW.

[27]  Rebecca E. Grinter,et al.  EatWell: sharing nutrition-related memories in a low-income community , 2008, CSCW.

[28]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden , 2008, CHI.

[29]  Richard P Moser,et al.  Effect of Adding a Virtual Community (Bulletin Board) to Smokefree.gov: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[30]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites , 2009, CHI.

[31]  Scott Counts,et al.  mimir: a market-based real-time question and answer service , 2009, CHI.

[32]  David E. Goodrich,et al.  An Online Community Improves Adherence in an Internet-Mediated Walking Program. Part 1: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.