Modeling selection criteria of R&D projects for awarding direct subsidies to the private sector

This paper aims to model selection criteria of R&D projects for awarding direct subsidies to the private sector, in order to assist government agencies in improving the way in which they allocate the subsidies. The modeling involved three steps. The first step was a literature review of the criteria used to make the decisions. The second step involved structuring the revised criteria into a hierarchical matrix. The third step involved evaluating the proposed matrix by weighting the criteria using the analytic hierarchy process. The results obtained allowed the elucidation of these criteria, the proposal of a valid and detailed hierarchical matrix and the integration of the personal perceptions of the decision-makers with the specific objectives of a public organization. Thus, this model was demonstrated to be an appropriate tool for structuring these criteria.

[1]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior , 2006 .

[2]  Alex Mosesova,et al.  PUBLIC PROJECT EVALUATION AND SELECTION , 2005 .

[3]  Raffaello Bronzini,et al.  Are Incentives for R&D Effective? Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Approach , 2011 .

[4]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconomic Evaluation Studies , 1999 .

[5]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[6]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  Bronwyn H Hall The Financing of Research and Development , 2002 .

[8]  Guido Pellegrini,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Innovation Incentives: Evidence from an Unexpected Shortage of Funds , 2011 .

[9]  Andrés Barge-Gil,et al.  Public selection and financing of R&D cooperative projects: Credit versus subsidy funding , 2010 .

[10]  V. Chandra Innovation and Growth: Chasing a Moving Frontier , 2010 .

[11]  Elise S. Brezis Focal randomisation: An optimal mechanism for the evaluation of R&D projects , 2007 .

[12]  Chun Hu,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process with fuzzy scoring in evaluating multidisciplinary R&D projects in China , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  U. Cantner,et al.  Picking the winner? Empirical evidence on the targeting of R&D subsidies to start-ups , 2012 .

[14]  Jyrki. Ali-Yrkko Impact of Public R&D Financing on Private R&D: Does Financial Constraint Matter?. CEPS ENEPRI Working Papers No. 30, 1 February 2005 , 2005 .

[15]  I. Busom,et al.  Who Participates in R&D Subsidy Programs? The Case of Spanish Manufacturing Firms , 2004 .

[16]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Economic analysis of research spillovers implications for the advanced technology program , 1996 .

[17]  M. Peneder,et al.  The Problem of Private Under-Investment in Innovation: A Policy Mind-Map , 2008 .

[18]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  What Difference Does it Make? Additionality in the Public Support of R&D in Large Firms , 2014 .

[19]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Do incentives to industrial R&D enhance research productivity and firm growth? Evidence from the Italian case , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[20]  I. Busom,et al.  Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? , 2004 .

[21]  S. Roper,et al.  An Ex Ante Evaluation Framework for the Regional Benefits of Publicly Supported R&D Projects , 2004 .

[22]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach ☆ , 2008 .

[23]  E. Lee,et al.  The effect of risk-sharing government subsidy on corporate R&D investment: Empirical evidence from Korea , 2010 .

[24]  Daniel Montolio,et al.  Assessing the Assignation of Public Subsidies: Do the Experts Choose the Most Efficient R&D Projects? , 2008 .

[25]  M. Wright,et al.  Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective , 2009 .

[26]  Vtt Publications,et al.  The Impact of Public R&D Funding , 2005 .

[27]  Andrew A. Toole,et al.  Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence , 1999 .

[28]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[29]  Robin Kleer,et al.  Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors , 2010 .

[30]  Anna Nosella,et al.  Addressing R&D investment decisions: a cross analysis of R&D project selection methods , 2010 .

[31]  B. Poti,et al.  Evaluation of firm R&D and innovation support: new indicators and the ex-ante prediction of ex-post additionality , 2011 .

[32]  Uk Jung,et al.  An ANP approach for R&D project evaluation based on interdependencies between research objectives and evaluation criteria , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[33]  Johan Hauknes,et al.  Economic rationales of government involvement in innovation and the supply of innovation-related services , 1999 .

[34]  W. Nasierowwki,et al.  Criteria for Assessment/Selection of Innovative Projects , 2006, 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future - PICMET 2006 Conference.

[35]  Fang-Ming Hsu,et al.  The effect of government-sponsored R&D programmes on additionality in recipient firms in Taiwan , 2009 .

[36]  Tanja Tanayama,et al.  Adverse selection and financing of innovation: is there a need for R&D subsidies? , 2008 .

[37]  Jyrki Ali-Yrkkö Impact of Public R&D Financing on Private R&D - Does Financial Constraint Matter? , 2005 .

[38]  Bojan Lalic,et al.  ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS AS A TOOL FOR SELECTING AND EVALUATING PROJECTS , 2009 .

[39]  Elmar Wolfstetter,et al.  How to allocate R&D (and other) subsidies: An experimentally tested policy recommendation , 2005 .

[40]  Terttu Luukkonen,et al.  Additionality of EU framework programmes , 2000 .

[41]  J. Z. Shyu,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Selection of Government-Sponsored Frontier Technology R&D Projects , 2003 .

[42]  Pin-Yu Chu,et al.  Using the fuzzy analytic network process for selecting technology R&D projects , 2011, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[43]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[44]  Jian Ma,et al.  A hybrid knowledge and model system for R&D project selection , 2002, Expert Syst. Appl..

[45]  Kiyong Om,et al.  Different factors considered in project selection at public and private R&D institutes , 1996 .

[46]  Tanja Tanayama,et al.  Evaluating Innovation Policy: A Structural Treatment Effect Model of R&D Subsidies , 2008 .

[47]  Mario Enea,et al.  Project Selection by Constrained Fuzzy AHP , 2004, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[48]  B. Junquera,et al.  Government support for R&D: The Spanish case , 1996 .

[49]  Henry R. Hertzfeld,et al.  Research and development project selection in the public sector , 1998 .

[50]  Katrin Hussinger,et al.  The Link between R&D Subsidies, R&D Spending and Technological Performance , 2004 .

[51]  Pin-Yu Chu,et al.  A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection☆ , 2008 .

[52]  Birgit Aschhoff The Effect of Subsidies on R&D Investment and Success – Do Subsidy History and Size Matter? , 2009 .