Carbon footprint and cumulative energy demand of greenhouse and open-field tomato cultivation systems under Southern and Central European climatic conditions

Abstract The horticultural industry consumes increasing amounts of energy and water contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and global warming. The aim of this study was to investigate the energy flow and the environmental impact of different tomato cultivation systems when renewable energy sources are implemented in the production chain. Seven scenarios including heated greenhouses and open-field crops, in Southern and Central Europe, were examined in order to identify potentials to reduce energy costs, greenhouse gas emissions and increase water use efficiency along the cultivation phase. The environmental impact category applied in this work (carbon footprint) is related to global warming potential, which includes the basic emitted greenhouse gases contributing to climate change and uses CO2 as reference gas (CO2-equivalents). Additionally, an energy flow indicator (cumulative energy demand) and an inventory flow indicator (water use), both relevant to climate change, agriculture and energy processes were determined to assess the different scenarios. The main results showed that annual carbon footprint values varied between 0.1 and 10.1 CO2-eq/kg tomato. Annual cumulative energy demand presented values from 0.8 to 160.5 MJ/kg tomato. Water use efficiency values ranged between 25.6 and 60.0 L/kg. Hotspots for all seven scenarios were determined, with fossil fuel consumption accounting for most of the environmental impact, where applicable. Open-field tomato cultivation presented lower greenhouse gas emissions and cumulated energy demand, however water use efficiency values were smaller than in greenhouse scenarios. In greenhouse production, the use of renewable energy sources and an increased marketable yield reduced their greenhouse gas emissions drastically, even to the levels of open-field cultivation.

[1]  Akira Yano,et al.  Prototype semi-transparent photovoltaic modules for greenhouse roof applications , 2014 .

[2]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  Carbon footprints of the horticultural products strawberries, asparagus, roses and orchids in Germany , 2015 .

[3]  G. K. Ntinas,et al.  Experimental performance of a hybrid solar energy saving system in greenhouses , 2011 .

[4]  K. Abeliotis,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bean production in the Prespa National Park, Greece , 2013 .

[5]  Selim Adem Hatirli,et al.  Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production , 2006 .

[6]  A. Antón,et al.  High decrease in nitrate leaching by lower N input without reducing greenhouse tomato yield , 2008, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[7]  A. Inés Fernández,et al.  CO2 mitigation accounting for Thermal Energy Storage (TES) case studies , 2015 .

[8]  Juan Ignacio Montero,et al.  DESIGN AND MODELLING OF NOVEL SYSTEM FOR HEATING AND COOLING OF SEMI-CLOSED GREENHOUSES IN MILD WINTER CLIMATE AREAS BASED ON FINE WIRE HEAT EXCHANGERS AND WATER STORAGE ON TANK , 2012 .

[9]  S. Bröring,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of different fertilizer product types , 2015 .

[10]  H.J.J. Janssen,et al.  Performance of a concentrated photovoltaic energy system with static linear Fresnel lenses , 2011 .

[11]  Marta Torrellas,et al.  LCA of a tomato crop in a multi-tunnel greenhouse in Almeria , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  Daniel Chemisana,et al.  THE EFFECT OF FRESNEL LENS - SOLAR ABSORBER SYSTEMS IN GREENHOUSES , 2012 .

[13]  Amir Vadiee,et al.  Energy management in horticultural applications through the closed greenhouse concept, state of the art , 2012 .

[14]  A. Antón,et al.  Assessment of tomato Mediterranean production in open-field and standard multi-tunnel greenhouse, with compost or mineral fertilizers, from an agricultural and environmental standpoint , 2011 .

[15]  Uwe Schmidt,et al.  Water and carbon footprint improvement for dried tomato value chain , 2015 .

[16]  J. Meyer.  Extremely insulated greenhouse concept with non-fossil fuel heating system. , 2011 .

[17]  Francisco Rodríguez,et al.  Development of a biomass-based system for nocturnal temperature and diurnal CO2 concentration control in greenhouses , 2014 .

[18]  A. Mamolos,et al.  Analysis of energy flow and greenhouse gas emissions in organic, integrated and conventional cultivation of white asparagus by PCA and HCA: cases in Greece , 2012 .

[19]  Wahidul K. Biswas,et al.  Evaluating the global warming potential of the fresh produce supply chain for strawberries,romaine/cos lettuces (Lactuca sativa), and button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) in Western Australia using life cycle assessment (LCA) , 2012 .

[20]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Life Cycle Inventories of Agricultural Production Systems , 2007 .

[21]  Uwe Schmidt,et al.  Plant Production in Solar Collector Greenhouses - Influence on Yield, Energy Use Efficiency and Reduction in CO2 Emissions , 2013 .

[22]  Francisco L. Santos.  Quality and maximum profit of industrial tomato as affected by distribution uniformity of drip irrigation system , 1996 .

[23]  H. Mempel,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS FOR HORTICULTURAL CROP PRODUCTION , 2004 .

[24]  M.N.A. Ruijs,et al.  Environmental and economic assessment of protected crops in four European scenarios , 2012 .

[25]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Thierry Boulard,et al.  Environmental impact of greenhouse tomato production in France , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[27]  G. K. Ntinas,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF A HYBRID SOLAR ENERGY SAVING SYSTEM ON THE GROWTH AND THE YIELD OF TOMATO CROP IN GREENHOUSES , 2012 .

[28]  G. K. Ntinas,et al.  Effect of energy saving solar sleeves on characteristics of hydroponic tomatoes grown in a greenhouse , 2015 .

[29]  Juan Ignacio Montero,et al.  LCA and tomato production in Mediterranean greenhouses , 2005 .

[30]  Girija Page,et al.  Carbon and water footprint tradeoffs in fresh tomato production , 2012 .

[31]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[32]  Wahidul K. Biswas,et al.  Economic viability of biogas technology in a Bangladesh village , 1997 .

[33]  Mustafa Özilgen,et al.  Energy utilization and carbon dioxide emission in the fresh, paste, whole-peeled, diced, and juiced , 2011 .

[34]  Huub Spiertz,et al.  Food production, crops and sustainability: restoring confidence in science and technology , 2010 .

[35]  Juan Ignacio Montero,et al.  An environmental impact calculator for greenhouse production systems. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  Open-loop recycling: Criteria for allocation procedures , 1997 .

[37]  Uwe Schmidt,et al.  ZINEG PROJECT - ENERGETIC EVALUATION OF A SOLAR COLLECTOR GREENHOUSE WITH ABOVE-GROUND HEAT STORAGE IN GERMANY , 2014 .

[38]  C. Fraisse,et al.  Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from open field-grown Florida tomato production , 2012 .

[39]  A. Nissinen,et al.  Carbon footprint of food – approaches from national input–output statistics and a LCA of a food portion , 2011 .

[40]  Giuliano Vox,et al.  Florence “ Sustainability of Well-Being International Forum ” . 2015 : Food for Sustainability and not just food , FlorenceSWIF 2015 Wood Biomass as Sustainable Energy for Greenhouses Heating in Italy , 2016 .

[41]  Mahmoud Omid,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of tomato and cucumber cultivation in greenhouses using life cycle assessment and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system , 2014 .

[42]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of protected crops: an Italian case study , 2012 .

[43]  Giuseppe Vignali,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a packaged tomato puree: a comparison of environmental impacts produced by different life cycle phases , 2014 .

[44]  Abdelhamid Farhat,et al.  Thermal performance of a conic basket heat exchanger coupled to a geothermal heat pump for greenhouse cooling under Tunisian climate , 2015 .

[45]  G. K. Ntinas,et al.  Thermal analysis of a hybrid solar energy saving system inside a greenhouse , 2014 .

[46]  E. Seymour,et al.  Assessing the role of a four-stage approach for improving the compatibility of Environmental Management Systems and Quality Assurance , 2007 .

[47]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the Environmental Impact of Water Consumption by Energy Crops Grown in Spain , 2013 .