A chemical–genetic interaction map of small molecules using high‐throughput imaging in cancer cells

Small molecules often affect multiple targets, elicit off‐target effects, and induce genotype‐specific responses. Chemical genetics, the mapping of the genotype dependence of a small molecule's effects across a broad spectrum of phenotypes can identify novel mechanisms of action. It can also reveal unanticipated effects and could thereby reduce high attrition rates of small molecule development pipelines. Here, we used high‐content screening and image analysis to measure effects of 1,280 pharmacologically active compounds on complex phenotypes in isogenic cancer cell lines which harbor activating or inactivating mutations in key oncogenic signaling pathways. Using multiparametric chemical–genetic interaction analysis, we observed phenotypic gene–drug interactions for more than 193 compounds, with many affecting phenotypes other than cell growth. We created a resource termed the Pharmacogenetic Phenome Compendium (PGPC), which enables exploration of drug mode of action, detection of potential off‐target effects, and the generation of hypotheses on drug combinations and synergism. For example, we demonstrate that MEK inhibitors amplify the viability effect of the clinically used anti‐alcoholism drug disulfiram and show that the EGFR inhibitor tyrphostin AG555 has off‐target activity on the proteasome. Taken together, this study demonstrates how combining multiparametric phenotyping in different genetic backgrounds can be used to predict additional mechanisms of action and to reposition clinically used drugs.

[1]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Biology-driven cancer drug development: back to the future , 2010, BMC Biology.

[2]  J. Christman,et al.  5-Azacytidine and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine as inhibitors of DNA methylation: mechanistic studies and their implications for cancer therapy , 2002, Oncogene.

[3]  Wolfgang Huber,et al.  EBImage—an R package for image processing with applications to cellular phenotypes , 2010, Bioinform..

[4]  R. Tagliaferri,et al.  Discovery of drug mode of action and drug repositioning from transcriptional responses , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Wolfgang Huber,et al.  Mapping genetic interactions in human cancer cells with RNAi and multiparametric phenotyping , 2013, Nature Methods.

[6]  Gareth J Waldron,et al.  Reducing safety-related drug attrition: the use of in vitro pharmacological profiling , 2012, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[7]  Roger M Macklis,et al.  Small-molecule inhibitor of p53 binding to mitochondria protects mice from gamma radiation , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[8]  J. Lehár,et al.  Systematic discovery of multicomponent therapeutics , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  G. Giaever,et al.  Miniature Short Hairpin RNA Screens to Characterize Antiproliferative Drugs , 2013, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[10]  F. Khuri,et al.  Inhibition of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Induces Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Dependent and Mnk-Mediated Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E Phosphorylation , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[11]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Targeted inactivation of CTNNB1 reveals unexpected effects of β-catenin mutation , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  A. Hopkins Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[13]  Wolfgang Huber,et al.  Mapping of signaling networks through synthetic genetic interaction analysis by RNAi , 2011, Nature Methods.

[14]  Michael Costanzo,et al.  Systematic exploration of synergistic drug pairs , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Multidimensional Drug Profiling By Automated Microscopy , 2004, Science.

[16]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Targeted inactivation of CTNNB1 reveals unexpected effects of beta-catenin mutation. , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  R. Pulido,et al.  The Tumor Suppressor PTEN Is Phosphorylated by the Protein Kinase CK2 at Its C Terminus , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes , 2006, Genome Biology.

[19]  I. Nasrallah,et al.  Mimosine Is a Cell-specific Antagonist of Folate Metabolism* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  Chris Bakal,et al.  Cell shape and the microenvironment regulate nuclear translocation of NF-κB in breast epithelial and tumor cells. , 2015, Molecular systems biology.

[21]  B. Al-Lazikani,et al.  Combinatorial drug therapy for cancer in the post-genomic era , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  Karen Sachs,et al.  Multiplexed mass cytometry profiling of cellular states perturbed by small-molecule regulators , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  L. Bailey,et al.  Folate and DNA methylation: a review of molecular mechanisms and the evidence for folate's role. , 2012, Advances in nutrition.

[24]  Jacques Colinge,et al.  A chemical genetic screen reveals a resistance mechanism to PI3K inhibitors in cancer , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[25]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Genetic inactivation of AKT1, AKT2, and PDPK1 in human colorectal cancer cells clarifies their roles in tumor growth regulation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Paul A Clemons,et al.  The Connectivity Map: Using Gene-Expression Signatures to Connect Small Molecules, Genes, and Disease , 2006, Science.

[27]  J. Lamerdin,et al.  Identifying off-target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[28]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Phenotypic screening of the ToxCast chemical library to classify toxic and therapeutic mechanisms , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  Gordon K Smyth,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments , 2011 .

[30]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Use of isogenic human cancer cells for high-throughput screening and drug discovery , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  M. Boutros,et al.  A synthetic lethal screen identifies FAT1 as an antagonist of caspase-8 in extrinsic apoptosis , 2014, The EMBO journal.

[32]  M. Boutros,et al.  Clustering phenotype populations by genome-wide RNAi and multiparametric imaging , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[33]  S. Soltoff Rottlerin is a mitochondrial uncoupler that decreases cellular ATP levels and indirectly blocks protein kinase Cdelta tyrosine phosphorylation. , 2001, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[34]  H. Simon,et al.  ATG5 is induced by DNA-damaging agents and promotes mitotic catastrophe independent of autophagy , 2013, Nature Communications.

[35]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[36]  Martin Vingron,et al.  Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression , 2002, ISMB.

[37]  Inmar E. Givoni,et al.  Exploring the Mode-of-Action of Bioactive Compounds by Chemical-Genetic Profiling in Yeast , 2006, Cell.

[38]  P. Khavari,et al.  Selective role for Mek1 but not Mek2 in the induction of epidermal neoplasia. , 2009, Cancer research.

[39]  Gary D Bader,et al.  The Genetic Landscape of a Cell , 2010, Science.

[40]  H. Overkleeft,et al.  Proteasome inhibitors: an expanding army attacking a unique target. , 2012, Chemistry & biology.

[41]  Peter J. Park,et al.  Systematic Identification of Synergistic Drug Pairs Targeting HIV , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[42]  Deborah A. Bowen,et al.  Akt inhibitor MK2206 selectively targets CLL B‐cell receptor induced cytokines, mobilizes lymphocytes and synergizes with bendamustine to induce CLL apoptosis , 2014, British journal of haematology.

[43]  Rolf Larsson,et al.  Inhibition of proteasome activity, nuclear factor‐KB translocation and cell survival by the antialcoholism drug disulfiram , 2006 .

[44]  E. C. Weinbach,et al.  Mechanism of Action of Reagents that uncouple Oxidative Phosphorylation , 1969, Nature.

[45]  Jacques Corbeil,et al.  Bendamustine (Treanda) Displays a Distinct Pattern of Cytotoxicity and Unique Mechanistic Features Compared with Other Alkylating Agents , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[46]  Carlo Rago,et al.  Mutant PIK3CA promotes cell growth and invasion of human cancer cells. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[47]  John A. Tallarico,et al.  Integrating high-content screening and ligand-target prediction to identify mechanism of action. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[48]  Oliver Pelz,et al.  web cellHTS2: A web-application for the analysis of high-throughput screening data , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[49]  Roland Arnold,et al.  A negative genetic interaction map in isogenic cancer cell lines reveals cancer cell vulnerabilities , 2013, Molecular systems biology.

[50]  Chris Bakal,et al.  Molecular Systems Biology Peer Review Process File Cell Shape and the Microenvironment Regulate Nuclear Translocation of Nf-κ B in Breast Epithelial and Tumor Cells Transaction Report , 2022 .

[51]  Joshua C. Gilbert,et al.  An Interactive Resource to Identify Cancer Genetic and Lineage Dependencies Targeted by Small Molecules , 2013, Cell.

[52]  Tao Jiang,et al.  ChemmineR: a compound mining framework for R , 2008, Bioinform..

[53]  Ravi Iyengar,et al.  Quantitative and Systems Pharmacology in the Post-genomic Era : New Approaches to Discovering Drugs and Understanding Therapeutic , 2011 .

[54]  Jeffry D. Sander,et al.  CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[55]  Robert P. St.Onge,et al.  Defining genetic interaction , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[57]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Multiplex Cytological Profiling Assay to Measure Diverse Cellular States , 2013, PloS one.

[58]  Adam Siddiqui-Jain,et al.  Combined inhibition of EGFR and CK2 augments the attenuation of PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling and the killing of cancer cells. , 2012, Cancer letters.

[59]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity , 2012, Nature.

[60]  S. Ramaswamy,et al.  Systematic identification of genomic markers of drug sensitivity in cancer cells , 2012, Nature.

[61]  Neil O Carragher,et al.  High-Content Phenotypic Profiling of Drug Response Signatures across Distinct Cancer Cells , 2010, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[62]  L. Pinna,et al.  Protein kinase CK2 phosphorylates and upregulates Akt/PKB , 2005, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[63]  O. Carugo,et al.  A Mek1–Mek2 heterodimer determines the strength and duration of the Erk signal , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.