Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiac Rehabilitation Delivery around the World

Background: To investigate impacts of COVID-19 on CR delivery around the globe, including effects on providers and patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a piloted survey was administered to CR programs globally via REDCap from April-June/2020. The 50 members of the ICCPR and personal contacts facilitated program identification. Results: Overall, 1062(18.3% program response rate) responses were received from 70/111(63.1% country response rate) countries in the world with existent CR programs. Of these, 367(49.1%) programs reported they had stopped CR delivery, and 203(27.1%) stopped temporarily (mean=8.3; SD=2.8weeks). Alternative models were delivered in 322(39.7%) programs, primarily through low-tech modes (n=226,19.3%). 353(30.2%) respondents were re-deployed, and 276 (37.3%) felt the need to work due to fear of losing their job, despite the perceived risk of contracting COVID-19 (mean=30.0%, SD=27.4/100). 266(22.5%) reported anxiety, 241(20.4%) were concerned about exposing their family, 113(9.7%) reported increased workload to transition to remote delivery, and 105(9.0%) were juggling caregiving responsibilities during business hours. Patients were often contacting staff regarding grocery shopping for heart-healthy foods (n=333,28.4%), how to use technology to interact with the program (n=329,27.9%), having to stop their exercise because they have no place to exercise (n=303,25.7%), and their risk of death from COVID-19 due to pre-existing cardiovascular disease (n=249,21.2%). Respondents perceived staff (n=488,41.3%) and patient (n=453,38.6%) personal protective equipment, as well as COVID-19 screening (n=414,35.2%) and testing (n=411,35.0%) as paramount to in-person service resumption. Conclusion: Approximately 4400 programs ceased service delivery. Those that remain open are implementing new technologies to ensure their patients receive CR safely, despite the challenges.

[1]  Dominique Hansen,et al.  The future is now: a call for action for cardiac telerehabilitation in the COVID-19 pandemic from the secondary prevention and rehabilitation section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology , 2020, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[2]  M. L. La Rovere,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation activities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Position Paper of the AICPR (Italian Association of Clinical Cardiology, Prevention and Rehabilitation). , 2020, Monaldi archives for chest disease = Archivio Monaldi per le malattie del torace.

[3]  D. Wood,et al.  Cardiac Rehabilitation During the COVID-19 Era: Guidance on Implementing Virtual Care , 2020, Canadian Journal of Cardiology.

[4]  C. Bambra,et al.  The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities , 2020, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[5]  S. Nichols COVID-19 and cardiac rehabilitation , 2020 .

[6]  M. Shishehbor,et al.  Impact of COVID‐19 pandemic on ST‐elevation myocardial infarction in a non‐COVID‐19 epicenter , 2020, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  R. de Caterina,et al.  Reduction of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction in Italy in the COVID-19 era , 2020, European heart journal.

[8]  M. Dębski,et al.  Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Insights from a British cardiac center☆ , 2020, American Heart Journal.

[9]  L. Neubeck,et al.  Delivering healthcare remotely to cardiovascular patients during COVID-19 , 2020, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  R. Arena,et al.  COVID-19: A Time for Alternate Models in Cardiac Rehabilitation to Take Centre Stage , 2020, Canadian Journal of Cardiology.

[11]  R. Gallagher,et al.  Future-proofing cardiac rehabilitation: Transitioning services to telehealth during COVID-19. , 2020, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[12]  A. Strömberg,et al.  Flexibility and safety in times of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Implications for nurses and allied professionals in cardiology , 2020, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  M. Ruel,et al.  Post-Discharge Cardiac Care in the Era of Coronavirus 2019: How Should We Prepare? , 2020, Canadian Journal of Cardiology.

[14]  T. Yeo,et al.  Have a heart during the COVID-19 crisis: Making the case for cardiac rehabilitation in the face of an ongoing pandemic , 2020, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[15]  Mohammad Madjid,et al.  Potential Effects of Coronaviruses on the Cardiovascular System: A Review. , 2020, JAMA cardiology.

[16]  G. Onder,et al.  Case-Fatality Rate and Characteristics of Patients Dying in Relation to COVID-19 in Italy. , 2020, JAMA.

[17]  Xiang Xie,et al.  COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system , 2020, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[18]  A. Khera,et al.  Continuity of care and outpatient management for patients with and at high risk for cardiovascular disease during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scientific statement from the American Society for Preventive Cardiology , 2020, American Journal of Preventive Cardiology.

[19]  R. Redfield,et al.  Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Zunyou Wu,et al.  Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. , 2020, JAMA.

[21]  G. Rubin,et al.  The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence , 2020, The Lancet.

[22]  Correction to: Cardiac Rehabilitation Dose Around the World: Variation and Correlates. , 2020, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[23]  S. Tarima,et al.  Cardiac Rehabilitation Dose Around the World , 2020, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[24]  N. Oldridge,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with coronary heart disease, chronic heart failure and associated risk factors: A systematic review of economic evaluations of randomized clinical trials , 2020, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[25]  L. Neubeck,et al.  Nature of Cardiac Rehabilitation Around the Globe , 2019, EClinicalMedicine.

[26]  L. Neubeck,et al.  Cardiac Rehabilitation Availability and Density around the Globe☆ , 2019, EClinicalMedicine.

[27]  Nader N Kabboul,et al.  Comparative Effectiveness of the Core Components of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Mortality and Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis , 2018, Journal of clinical medicine.

[28]  S. Grace,et al.  Cardiac Rehabilitation Models around the Globe , 2018, Journal of clinical medicine.

[29]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Global, Regional, and National Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases for 10 Causes, 1990 to 2015 , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  R. Taylor,et al.  Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[31]  Rod S Taylor,et al.  Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  Tiffany Moxham,et al.  Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[33]  D. Stewart,et al.  The Occupational and Psychosocial Impact of SARS on Academic Physicians in Three Affected Hospitals , 2005, Psychosomatics.

[34]  D. Stewart,et al.  The Psychosocial Effects of Being Quarantined following Exposure to SARS: A Qualitative Study of Toronto Health Care Workers , 2004, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.