Impedance Deduction Based on Insertion Loss Measurements of Liners under Grazing Flow Conditions

This paper presents the results of insertion loss measurements and numerical impedance eduction of three dierent liner samples. An overview over the test rig and methodology is given and preprocessed results in terms of reection and transmission coecients as well as the energy dissipation are discussed. These coecients are calculated for discrete frequencies within the investigated frequency range. Subsequently, a numerical post processing is performed in the time domain and the educed impedance function for each sample and ow Mach number is presented. This post processing in the time domain uses an impedance model, which is based on the Extended Helmholtz Resonator with ve free parameters. The parameters of the model are tted via an optimization, which determines the whole frequency response by one optimization process. The comparison of measured and numerically evaluated energy coecients proves the usability of the tools for impedance evaluation under ow conditions. Finally the impedance results of the dierent samples are discussed, including a comparative study with Aermacchi data of the NLR ow tube and Aermacchi impedance tube experiments.

[1]  C. Bogey Three-dimensional non-refrective boundary conditions for acoustic simulation : far field formulation and validation test cases , 2002 .

[2]  Helmut V. Fuchs Schallabsorber und Schalldämpfer , 2004 .

[3]  M. K. Myers,et al.  On the acoustic boundary condition in the presence of flow , 1980 .

[4]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  A Quasi-3-D Theory for Impedance Eduction in Uniform Grazing Flow , 2005 .

[5]  D I Blokhintsev,et al.  Acoustics of a Nonhomogeneous Moving Medium. , 1956 .

[6]  Christopher K. W. Tam,et al.  Wall boundary conditions for high-order finite-difference schemes in computational aeroacoustics , 1994 .

[7]  Jeff D. Eldredge,et al.  The absorption of axial acoustic waves by a perforated liner with bias flow , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  Brian J. Tester,et al.  The propagation and attenuation of sound in lined ducts containing uniform or “plug” flow , 1973 .

[9]  Paul Murray,et al.  Manufacturing Process and Boundary Layer Influences on Perforate Liner Impedance , 2005 .

[10]  M.Y. Hussaini,et al.  Low-Dissipation and Low-Dispersion Runge-Kutta Schemes for Computational Acoustics , 1994 .

[11]  Ulrich J. Kurze,et al.  Influence of Flow and High Sound Level on the Attenuation in a Lined Duct , 1970 .

[12]  Ingo Röhle,et al.  Untersuchung der akustischen Eigenschaften perforierter Liner , 2007 .

[13]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Benchmark Data for Evaluation of Aeroacoustic Propagation Codes With Grazing Flow , 2005 .

[14]  C. Tam,et al.  Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics , 1993 .

[15]  S. L. Sarin,et al.  An experimental study of the acoustic impedance of Helmholtz resonator arrays under a turbulent boundary layer , 1981 .

[16]  Tony L. Parrott,et al.  Assessment of Bulk Absorber Properties for Multi-Layer Perforates in Porous Honeycomb Liners , 2006 .

[17]  Frank Thiele,et al.  The Stability of Time Explicit Impedance Models , 2007 .

[18]  Frank Thiele,et al.  Comparison of Time-Domain Impedance Boundary Conditions by Lined Duct Flows , 2006 .

[19]  W. Koch,et al.  Eigensolutions for liners in uniform mean flow ducts , 1983 .

[20]  Lars Enghardt,et al.  Experimental investigation of the acoustic damping of perforated liners with bias flow , 2007 .

[21]  W. Habashi,et al.  2N-Storage Low Dissipation and Dispersion Runge-Kutta Schemes for Computational Acoustics , 1998 .

[22]  Yusuf Özyörük,et al.  Time-Domain Numerical Simulation of a Flow-Impedance Tube , 1998 .

[23]  S. Rienstra Impedance Models in Time Domain including the Extended Helmholtz Resonator Model , 2006 .

[24]  C. Zwikker,et al.  Sound Absorbing Materials , 1949 .

[25]  R. J. Nijboer,et al.  A new facility for hot stream acoustic liner testing , 2003 .

[26]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Comparison of Two Acoustic Waveguide Methods for Determining Liner Impedance , 2001 .

[27]  Willie R. Watson,et al.  Design and Evaluation of Modifications to the NASA Langley Flow Impedance Tube , 2004 .

[28]  Frank Thiele,et al.  Comparison of Time-Domain Impedance Boundary Conditions for Lined Duct Flows , 2007 .

[29]  Piergiorgio Ferrante,et al.  Influence of Aircraft Nacelle Acoustic Panel Drainage Slots on Duct Attenuation , 2007 .

[30]  Sw Sjoerd Rienstra,et al.  A classification of duct modes based on surface waves , 2001 .

[31]  L. Kovasznay,et al.  Non-linear interactions in a viscous heat-conducting compressible gas , 1958, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[32]  V. Potemkin,et al.  Turbulent boundary layer , 1980 .

[33]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming , 2000, Math. Program..