A review of international practice in the design of voluntary Pollution Prevention Programs

Abstract Voluntary approaches to industry-wide pollution prevention programs have gained a global impetus. Despite this impetus relatively little research has been undertaken into identifying key features of successful programs. This research identified these features by reviewing selected programs in five countries, Australia, Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. Nine key features have been identified, namely: Adequate and consistent funding; Collaborative relationship with industry; Single sector program focus; Setting credible goals; Info-regulation and resources available; Threat of credible enforcement; Regular and credible monitoring; Visible participant benefits; and, Transparent provision of program results. The research complements other work and while showing a high level of similarity in the features, provided also for the inclusion of two further design features, namely ‘adequate and consistent funding’, and developing a maintaining a ‘collaborative relationship with industry’. It is suggested that the nine design features alone, while important, are insufficient and that further research is required to identify these other supporting factors.

[1]  Kenneth A. Zarker,et al.  Pollution prevention through performance-based initiatives and regulation in the United States , 2008 .

[2]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  The impact of voluntary environmental protection instruments on company environmental performance , 2004 .

[3]  Kenneth F. D. Hughey,et al.  Voluntary Pollution Prevention Programs in New Zealand – An evaluation of practice versus design features , 2011 .

[4]  Voluntary approaches in Japan: proven record of pollution control agreements and new industrial initiatives for the protection of the global environment , 1999 .

[5]  N. Gunningham,et al.  Voluntary Approaches to Environmental Protection , 2002 .

[6]  Michael Peters *,et al.  SME environmental attitudes and participation in local‐scale voluntary initiatives: some practical applications , 2004 .

[7]  N. Gunningham BEYOND COMPLIANCE : NEXT GENERATION ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION , 2022 .

[8]  Paul Leinster,et al.  Environmental management systems and company performance: assessing the case for extending risk‐based regulation , 2003 .

[9]  E. Welch,et al.  Japanese voluntary environmental agreements: Bargaining power and reciprocity as contributors to effectiveness , 2002 .

[10]  C. Leblond CHAPTER 2 – GROWTH AND RENEWAL , 1972 .

[11]  Gary L. Miller,et al.  Advancing pollution prevention and cleaner production – USA's contribution , 2008 .

[12]  J. Mazurek The Use of Voluntary Agreements in the United States: An Initial Survey , 1998 .

[13]  Nusrat Yousuf,et al.  Tomorrow's World , 1997 .

[14]  Fábio Müller Guerrini,et al.  The impact of Six Sigma in the performance of a Pollution Prevention program , 2009 .