Environmental Policy As Learning: A New View of an Old Landscape

Environmental policy in the United States has always been characterized by high levels of political conflict. At the same time, however, policy makers have shown a capacity to learn from their own and others' experience. This article examines U.S. environmental policy since 1970 as a learning process and, more specifically, as an effort to develop three kinds of capacities for policy learning. The first decade and a half may be seen in terms of technical learning, characterized by a high degree of technical and legal proficiency, but also narrow problem definitions, institutional fragmentation, and adversarial relations among actors. In the 1 980s, growing recognition of deficiencies in technical learning led to a search for new goals, strategies, and policy instruments, in what may be termed conceptual learning. By the early 1990s, policy makers also recognized a need for a new set of capacities at social learning, reflecting trends in European environmental policy, international interest in the concept of sustainability, and dissatisfaction with the U.S. experience. Social learning stresses communication and interaction among actors. Most industrial nations, including the United States, are working to develop and integrate capacities for all three kinds of learning. Efforts to integrate capacities for conceptual and social learning in the United States have had mixed success, however, because the institutional and legal framework for environmental policy still is founded on technical learning.

[1]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Crafting the Next Generation of Market-Based Environmental Tools , 1997 .

[2]  E. Bardach,et al.  Going by the book : the problem of regulatory unreasonableness , 1983 .

[3]  Robert A. Kagan,et al.  Adversarial legalism and American government , 1991 .

[4]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  The Politics of Environmental Discourse , 1997 .

[5]  Richard Rose,et al.  Lesson-drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space , 1993 .

[6]  Jennifer Nash,et al.  CODES OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICE: Assessing Their Potential as a Tool for Change , 1997 .

[7]  Gail Bingham,et al.  Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience , 1986 .

[8]  F. R. Eisele,et al.  Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. , 1975 .

[9]  L. Caldwell Environment as a Focus for Public Policy , 1963 .

[10]  Philip J. Harter,et al.  Negotiating regulations: A cure for the malaise? , 1982 .

[11]  Andy Gouldson,et al.  Regulatory Realities: The Implementation and Impact of Industrial Environmental Regulation , 1998 .

[12]  Marc Landy,et al.  The Environmental Protection Agency , 1990 .

[13]  Livio D. DeSimone,et al.  Eco‐Efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development , 1997 .

[14]  John Braithwaite,et al.  Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate , 1992 .

[15]  Jurgen Schmandt,et al.  Managing Comprehensive Rule Making: EPA's Plan for Integrated Environmental Management , 1985 .

[16]  Robert A. Kagan,et al.  The “Criminology of the Corporation” and Regulatory Enforcement Strategies , 1980 .

[17]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Planning, Democracy and the Challenge of Sustainable Development , 1997 .

[18]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[19]  J. Opie Promise and performance : choosing and implementing an environmental policy , 1981 .

[20]  W. Lafferty The politics of sustainable development: Global norms for national implementation , 1996 .

[21]  A. Giddens The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[22]  Bradford C. Mank,et al.  The Environmental Protection Agency's Project XL and Other Regulatory Reform Initiatives: The Need for Legislative Authorization , 1998 .

[23]  Martin Jänicke,et al.  National environmental policies : a comparative study of capacity-building : with a data appendix, international profiles of change since 1970 , 1997 .

[24]  J. Dryzek The Politics of the Earth , 2021 .

[25]  Daniel J. Fiorino Making Environmental Policy , 1995 .

[26]  Colin J. Bennett,et al.  The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change , 1992 .

[27]  William Creager,et al.  Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) , 2001 .

[28]  B. Peters,et al.  Governance without government? Rethinking public administration , 1998 .

[29]  Neil Gunningham,et al.  Environment, Self‐Regulation, and the Chemical Industry: Assessing Responsible Care* , 1995 .

[30]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[31]  Gunther Teubner,et al.  Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law , 2021, Luhmann and Law.