Calculated Epithelial/Absorbed Power Density for Exposure From Antennas at 10–90 GHz: Intercomparison Study Using a Planar Skin Model

International organizations have collaborated to revise standards and guidelines for human protection from exposure to electromagnetic fields. In the frequency range of 6–300 GHz, the permissible spatially averaged epithelial/absorbed power density, which is primarily derived from thermal modeling, is considered as the basic restriction. However, for the averaging methods of the epithelial/absorbed power density inside human tissues, only a few groups have presented calculated results obtained using different exposure conditions and numerical methods. Because experimental validation is extremely difficult in this frequency range, this paper presents the first intercomparison study of the calculated epithelial/absorbed power density inside a human body model exposed to different frequency sources ranging from 10–90 GHz. This intercomparison aims to clarify the difference in the calculated results caused by different numerical electromagnetic methods in dosimetry analysis from 11 research groups using planar skin models. To reduce the comparison variances caused by various key parameters, computational conditions (e.g., the antenna type, dimensions, and dielectric properties of the skin models) were unified. The results indicate that the maximum relative standard deviation (RSD) of the peak spatially averaged epithelial/absorbed power densities for one- and three-layer skin models are less than 17.49% and 17.39%, respectively, when using a dipole antenna as the exposure source. For the dipole array antenna, the corresponding maximum RSD increases to 32.49% and 42.55%, respectively. Under the considered exposure scenarios, the RSD in the spatially averaged epithelial/absorbed power densities decrease from 42.55% to 16.7% when the frequency is increased from 10–90 GHz. Furthermore, the deviation from the two equations recommended by the exposure guidelines

[1]  A. Hirata,et al.  Computation of Absorbed Power Densities in High-Resolution Head Models by Considering Skin Thickness in Quasi-Millimeter and Millimeter Wave Bands , 2022, IEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology.

[2]  A. Hirata,et al.  Assessment of incident power density in different shapes of averaging area for radio-frequency exposure above 6 GHz , 2022, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Ante Lojic Kapetanovic,et al.  Assessment of Incident Power Density on Spherical Head Model up to 100 GHz , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[4]  M. Zhadobov,et al.  Exposure Levels Induced in Curved Body Parts at mmWaves , 2022, IEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology.

[5]  Kun Li Multivariate Regression Analysis of Skin Temperature Rises for Millimeter-Wave Dosimetry , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[6]  Tongning Wu,et al.  Editorial: Human Exposure to New-Emerging Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Fields , 2022, Frontiers in Public Health.

[7]  K. Sasaki,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation of Clothed Skin Exposure to Electromagnetic Field With Oblique Incidence Angles at 60 GHz , 2022, Frontiers in Public Health.

[8]  M. Zhadobov,et al.  High-Resolution Technique for Near-Field Power Density Measurement Accounting for Antenna/Body Coupling at Millimeter Waves , 2021, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[9]  K. Wake,et al.  Performance Analysis of Incident Power Density Evaluation by Inverse Source Method for Compliance Assessment at Quasi-Millimeter and Millimeter Wave Bands , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[10]  W. Kainz,et al.  Assessment of Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields: Review and Future Directions , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[11]  Walid El Hajj,et al.  Effect of Incidence Angle on the Spatial-Average of Incident Power Density Definition to Correlate Skin Temperature Rise for Millimeter Wave Exposures , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[12]  M. Zhadobov,et al.  Impact of Textile on Electromagnetic Power and Heating in Near-Surface Tissues at 26 GHz and 60 GHz , 2021, IEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology.

[13]  Q. Balzano,et al.  Time-temperature Thresholds and Safety Factors for Thermal Hazards from Radiofrequency Energy above 6 GHz , 2021, Health physics.

[14]  A. Hirata,et al.  Exposure Assessment of Array Antennas at 28 GHz Using Hybrid Spherical Near-Field Transformation and FDTD Method , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[15]  Soichi Watanabe,et al.  Human exposure to radiofrequency energy above 6 GHz: review of computational dosimetry studies , 2020, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Transient Thermal Responses of Skin to Pulsed Millimeter Waves , 2020, IEEE Access.

[17]  A. Hirata,et al.  Assessment of absorbed power density and temperature rise for nonplanar body model under electromagnetic exposure above 6 GHz , 2020, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). , 2020, Health physics.

[19]  Teruo Onishi,et al.  Skin Temperature Elevation for Incident Power Densities From Dipole Arrays at 28 Ghz , 2020, IEEE Access.

[20]  T. Samaras,et al.  RF-INDUCED TEMPERATURE INCREASE IN A STRATIFIED MODEL OF THE SKIN FOR PLANE-WAVE EXPOSURE AT 6-100 GHZ. , 2020, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[21]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1™-2019 “IEEE Standard for Safety Levels With Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz” , 2019, IEEE Access.

[22]  Quirino Balzano,et al.  EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT OF PORTABLE WIRELESS DEVICES ABOVE 6 GHz. , 2019, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[23]  Soichi Watanabe,et al.  Relationship between power density and surface temperature elevation for human skin exposure to electromagnetic waves with oblique incidence angle from 6 GHz to 1 THz , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Bo Xu,et al.  Analysis of Impacts of Expected RF EMF Exposure Restrictions on Peak EIRP of 5G User Equipment at 28 GHz and 39 GHz Bands , 2019, IEEE Access.

[25]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Setting exposure guidelines and product safety standards for radio-frequency exposure at frequencies above 6 GHz: brief review , 2018, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[26]  Teruo Onishi,et al.  Averaging Area of Incident Power Density for Human Exposure from Patch Antenna Arrays , 2018, IEICE Trans. Electron..

[27]  Quirino Balzano,et al.  Tissue models for RF exposure evaluation at frequencies above 6 GHz , 2018, Bioelectromagnetics.

[28]  Quirino Balzano,et al.  Thermal Modeling for the Next Generation of Radiofrequency Exposure Limits: Commentary. , 2017, Health physics.

[29]  D. Colombi,et al.  Thermal response of tissue to RF exposure from canonical dipoles at frequencies for future mobile communication systems , 2017 .

[30]  Quirino Balzano,et al.  Thermal Response of Human Skin to Microwave Energy: A Critical Review , 2016, Health physics.

[31]  Zhinong Ying,et al.  Exposure to RF EMF From Array Antennas in 5G Mobile Communication Equipment , 2016, IEEE Access.

[32]  Ronan Sauleau,et al.  Millimeter-wave interactions with the human body: state of knowledge and recent advances , 2011, International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies.

[33]  Soichi Watanabe,et al.  Parameter variation effects on temperature elevation in a steady-state, one-dimensional thermal model for millimeter wave exposure of one- and three-layer human tissue , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Soichi Watanabe,et al.  Effects of dielectric permittivities on skin heating due to millimeter wave exposure , 2009, Biomedical engineering online.

[35]  T. Weiland,et al.  A practical guide to 3-D simulation , 2008, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[36]  M C Ziskin,et al.  Millimeter wave dosimetry of human skin , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[37]  Dragan Poljak,et al.  Advanced Modeling in Computational Electromagnetic Compatibility , 2007 .

[38]  A. Faraone,et al.  Comparisons of computed mobile phone induced SAR in the SAM phantom to that in anatomically correct models of the human head , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[39]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  T. Weiland A discretization model for the solution of Maxwell's equations for six-component fields , 1977 .

[41]  Walid El Hajj,et al.  Intercomparison of Calculated Incident Power Density and Temperature Rise for Exposure from Different Antennas at 10–90 GHz , 2021, IEEE Access.

[42]  A. Hirata,et al.  Assessment of mmWave Exposure From Antenna Based on Transformation of Spherical Wave Expansion to Plane Wave Expansion , 2021, IEEE Access.

[43]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Power Absorption and Skin Temperature Rise from Simultaneous Near-field Exposure at 2 and 28 GHz , 2021, IEEE Access.

[44]  Kanako Wake,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Power Densities Related to Electromagnetic Near-Field Exposures With Safety Guidelines From 6 to 100 GHz , 2021, IEEE Access.

[45]  Teruo Onishi,et al.  Error Analysis of a Near-Field Reconstruction Technique Based on Plane Wave Spectrum Expansion for Power Density Assessment Above 6 GHz , 2019, IEEE Access.

[46]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Area-Averaged Transmitted Power Density at Skin Surface as Metric to Estimate Surface Temperature Elevation , 2018, IEEE Access.

[47]  Bo Xu,et al.  RF Compliance Study of Temperature Elevation in Human Head Model Around 28 GHz for 5G User Equipment Application: Simulation Analysis , 2018, IEEE Access.

[48]  E. Neufeld,et al.  IT’IS Database for Thermal and Electromagnetic Parameters of Biological Tissues , 2012 .

[49]  C. Gabriel Compilation of the Dielectric Properties of Body Tissues at RF and Microwave Frequencies. , 1996 .

[50]  IEEE Guide for the Definition of Incident Power Density to Correlate Surface Temperature Elevation , 2022 .