Multiscale sources of variation in ecological variables: modeling spatial dispersion, elaborating sampling designs

Detection of structured spatial variation and identification of spatial scales are important aspects of ecological studies. Spatial structures can correspond to physical features of the environment or to intrinsic characteristics of ecological processes and phenomena. Spatial variability has been approached through several techniques such as classical analysis of variance, or the calculation of fractal dimensions, correlograms or variograms. Under certain assumptions, these techniques are all closely related to one another and represent equivalent tools to characterize spatial structures.Our perception of ecological variables and processes depends on the scale at which variables are measured. We propose simple nested sampling designs enabling the detection of a wide range of spatial structures that show the relationships among nested spatial scales. When it is known that the phenomenon under study is structured as a nested series of spatial scales, this provides useful information to estimate suitable sampling intervals, which are essential to establish the relationships between spatial patterns and ecological phenomena. The use of nested sampling designs helps in choosing the most suitable solutions to reduce the amount of random variation resulting from a survey. These designs are obtained by increasing the sampling intensity to detect a wider spectrum of frequencies, or by revisiting the sampling technique to select more representative sampling units.

[1]  John A. Ludwig,et al.  A comparison of paired- with blocked-quadrat variance methods for the analysis of spatial pattern , 1978, Vegetatio.

[2]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Identifying relationships between adult and juvenile bivalves at different spatial scales , 1997 .

[3]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and sampling design in plant ecology , 1989, Vegetatio.

[4]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[5]  P. Burrough Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology: Spatial aspects of ecological data , 1995 .

[6]  G. Matheron Les variables régionalisées et leur estimation : une application de la théorie de fonctions aléatoires aux sciences de la nature , 1965 .

[7]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatial pattern and ecological analysis , 1989, Vegetatio.

[8]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Spatial models for spatial statistics: some unification , 1993 .

[9]  Ruth G. Shaw,et al.  Anova for Unbalanced Data: An Overview , 1993 .

[10]  David J. Mulla,et al.  Geostatistical Tools for Modeling and Interpreting Ecological Spatial Dependence , 1992 .

[11]  John C. Gower Variance component estimation for unbalanced hierarchical classifications , 1962 .

[12]  P. Greig-Smith,et al.  The Use of Random and Contiguous Quadrats in the Study of the Structure of Plant Communities , 1952 .

[13]  W. Lewis Comparison of Temporal and Spatial Variation in the Zooplankton of a Lake by Means of Variance Components , 1978 .

[14]  A. T. Miesch Variograms and Variance Components in Geochemistry and Ore Evaluation , 1975 .

[15]  T. Platt,et al.  SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF THE PRODUCTIVITY: BIOMASS RATIO FOR PHYTOPLANKTON IN A SMALL MARINE BASIN , 1973 .

[16]  James R. Carr,et al.  On the practice of estimating fractal dimension , 1991 .

[17]  Pierre Dutilleul,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity against Heteroscedasticity: An Ecological Paradigm versus a Statistical Concept , 1993 .

[18]  David Michel,et al.  Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation , 1977 .

[19]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[20]  Jens Feder,et al.  The fractal nature of geochemical landscapes , 1992 .

[21]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Distribution patterns of tree species in a Malaysian tropical rain forest , 1997 .

[22]  P. Burrough Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data , 1981, Nature.

[23]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Spatial pattern of diversity in a tropical rain forest in Malaysia , 1996 .

[24]  C. Sparrow The Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[25]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Environmental control and spatial structure in ecological communities: an example using oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatei) , 1994, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[26]  N. Manokaran,et al.  Floristic composition of Pasoh Forest Reserve, a lowland rain forest in Peninsular Malaysia. , 1990 .

[27]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Diversity pattern and spatial scale: a study of a tropical rain forest of Malaysia , 1994, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[28]  E. Renshaw,et al.  The description of spatial pattern using two-dimensional spectral analysis , 1984, Vegetatio.

[29]  S. Levin THE PROBLEM OF PATTERN AND SCALE IN ECOLOGY , 1992 .

[30]  B. Milne Heterogeneity as a Multiscale Characteristic of Landscapes , 1991 .

[31]  Margaret A. Oliver,et al.  Combining Nested and Linear Sampling for Determining the Scale and Form of Spatial Variation of Regionalized Variables , 2010 .

[32]  Pierre Dutilleul,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1993 .

[33]  R. Sokal,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation in biology: 1. Methodology , 1978 .

[34]  J. Ord,et al.  Spatial Processes. Models and Applications , 1982 .

[35]  P. Moran Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[36]  Denis Marcotte,et al.  Variance and spatial scales in a tropical rain forest: changing the size of sampling units , 1997, Plant Ecology.

[37]  S. Nortcliff,et al.  SOIL VARIABILITY AND RECONNAISSANCE SOIL MAPPING. A STATISTICAL STUDY IN NORFOLK , 1978 .

[38]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation in biology: 2. Some biological implications and four applications of evolutionary and ecological interest , 1978 .

[39]  M. Palmer,et al.  Fractal geometry: a tool for describing spatial patterns of plant communities , 1988, Vegetatio.

[40]  R. Geary,et al.  The Contiguity Ratio and Statistical Mapping , 1954 .

[41]  J. Downing,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity in Freshwater Zooplankton: Variation with Body Size, Depth, and Scale , 1988 .