An Adaptive Conjoint Analysis of Freight Service Alternatives: Evaluating the Maritime Option

The growing interest towards a re-balancing of freight traffic over the different modes, has brought renewed focus on the "Motorways of the sea" as they have been defined by the EU Commission in the recently issued White paper (2001). These could constitute a valid alternative to land transport over medium-long distance, favouring, at the same time, a greater integration among different modes. However, the great potential of this alternative - which is increasingly capturing the interest of policymakers - should be evaluated also in the light of the level of competitiveness nowadays required by the operators. The latter, in fact, need a flexible transport system capable of adapting to the modern system of production and completely integrated within the logistics networks (both existing and under construction). Furthermore, in order to effectively promote the use of this alternative, it is necessary to undertake a number of initiatives directed mainly at reducing the bottlenecks currently present within the ports and in the links between ports and their interland. In determining the necessary investments in intermodal sea-land infrastructures it is essential to evaluate the dimension and the extent of the potential re-orientation of traffic flows towards maritime transport which would yield insight on the appropriate/optimal dimension of such investments. In order to achieve this, it would be essential to have a set of information not only on the current movements but also on their potential reallocation. An estimation of the latter cannot be achieved without an in-depth analysis of shippers behaviour. However, while in the last year a number of documents have been put forward on the great opportunities offered by the development of the "Motorways of the sea" in re-directing freight flows, there is a lack of any empirical analysis on the determinants of such choice by operators. In other words, a lot has been done in analysing supply while very little in analysing demand. In this work we aim to identify the value that the user assigns to the specific transport alternative and the factors - related to both the mode and the specific organisation of the companies - that exert a significant influence on the choice of the shipper. These elements represent a necessary prerequisite for any previsions. The methodology used falls within the definition of conjoint Analysis. We will measure the trade-offs users of freight transport services make in choosing between alternative modes. We will also use the result to predict their choices with regards to alternatives which, at the moment might not be present, but which might be placed on the market. The assumption we make, following the approach of Bolis and Maggi (1999) and Fowkes and Tweddle (1996), is that the transport service can be ?broken down? into its component attributes. As it is well known, conjoint analysis allows to determine the value that individuals place on any product as equivalent to the sum of the utility they derive from all the attributes making up a product. In particular, given the successful applications to land transport, we use "Adaptive Stated Preferences" (ASP) techniques adjusted in order to carry out the analysis of freight transport demand in the maritime context. We aim to evaluate the preferences of operators in terms of service attributes of sea transport. Given the purposes of this study, for the moment we focus the empirical application on a specific geographical context. In particular, we analyse the preferences of operators localised in the north-west regions of Italy with respect to the possibility of accessing a maritime ro-ro service from the ports of Genoa or La Spezia. The analysis is carried out in two phases: a postal survey and a subsequent direct interview. The latter is done creating a ?transport experiment? and recording the behaviour and the choices of the interviewed. Following this approach, we obtain an accurate estimation of operators? willingness to pay for the specific service characteristics (hard output) and we induce them to reveal the rank of their preferences for a set of potential new services (soft output). In the first part of the paper we give details of the specific transport options we are considering and we describe the project carried out, in the second part we illustrate the methodology used the and the necessary modification we have had to carry out in order to implement the study in a maritime context. In the third part we discuss the data collection process and we carry out a preliminary data analysis, while, in the fourth section, we present the results of the econometric model (logit model) used to analyse the data and we give some interpretation. Finally, in the last section, we present some concluding remarks.

[1]  L. Crivelli,et al.  Dimensione ottima degli ospedali in uno Stato federale , 2000 .

[2]  M. Filippini,et al.  Regional differences in outpatient antibiotic consumption in Switzerland , 2004 .

[3]  Rico Maggi,et al.  Evidence on Shippers ' Transport and Logistics Choice , 2001 .

[4]  Dimitrios A Tsamboulas,et al.  Decision-Making Process in Intermodal Transportation , 2000 .

[5]  K. Train,et al.  Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles , 1999, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.

[6]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions , 1990 .

[7]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Travel behaviour research : the leading edge , 2001 .

[8]  A. Daly,et al.  MODELS USING MIXED STATED-PREFERENCE AND REVEALED-PREFERENCE INFORMATION. , 1991 .

[9]  M. Farsi,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Cost Efficiency in Non-Profit and Public Nursing Homes , 2004 .

[10]  Carlo Cambini,et al.  Competitive Tendering and Optimal Size in the Regional Bus Transportation Industry: An Example from Italy , 2003 .

[11]  M. Farsi,et al.  Regulation and Measuring Cost-Efficiency with Panel Data Models: Application to Electricity Distribution Utilities , 2004 .

[12]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  Optimal Size in the Waste Collection Sector , 2002 .

[13]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  The use of a variable cost function in the regulation of the Italian water industry , 2001 .

[14]  Ó. González,et al.  Monitoring a trans-border labour market in view of liberalization - the case of Ticino , 2004 .

[15]  G. Barone-Adesi,et al.  Valuation of derivatives based on CKLS interest rate models , 1999 .

[16]  Mark Wardman,et al.  A COMPARISON OF REVEALED PREFERENCE AND STATED PREFERENCE MODELS OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR , 1988 .

[17]  M. Farsi,et al.  Unobserved heterogeneity in stochastic cost frontier models: an application to Swiss nursing homes , 2005 .

[18]  S. Bolis,et al.  Adaptive stated preference analysis of shippers? transport and logistics choice , 1998 .

[19]  Angela Stefania Bergantino,et al.  An Analysis of Maritime Ro-Ro Freight Transport Service Attributes through Adaptive Stated Preference: an Application to a Sample of Freight Forwarders , 2004 .

[20]  Peter R. Stopher A review of separate and joint strategies for the use of data on revealed and stated choices , 1998 .

[21]  J. Louviere,et al.  Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities , 1994 .

[22]  G. Barone-Adesi,et al.  Incomplete information and the closed-end fund discount , 1999 .

[23]  E. Bergman,et al.  STATED PREFERENCES FOR TRANSPORT AMONG INDUSTRIAL CLUSTER FIRMS , 2000 .

[24]  Marco Alderighi,et al.  Adoption and use of new information technology , 2000 .

[25]  K. Cullinane,et al.  IDENTIFYING INFLUENTIAL ATTRIBUTES IN FREIGHT ROUTE/MODE CHOICE DECISIONS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[26]  Chris Nash,et al.  IMPACT OF THE CHANNEL TUNNEL: A SURVEY OF ANGLO-EUROPEAN UNITISED FREIGHT: RESULTS OF THE PHASE I INTERVIEWS. , 1995 .

[27]  M. Filippini,et al.  Regulation, Ownership and Efficiency in the Swiss Nursing Home Industry , 2001, International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics.

[28]  M. Filippini Cost and scale efficiency in the nursing home sector , 1999 .

[29]  M. Filippini,et al.  The influence of ownership on the cost of bus service provision in Switzerland - an empirical illustration , 2003 .

[30]  W. Greene,et al.  Efficiency Measurement in Network Industries: Application to the Swiss Railway Companies , 2004 .

[31]  François Derrien,et al.  Quid Pro Quo in Ipos: Why Book-Building is Dominating Auctions , 2004 .

[32]  A S Fowkes,et al.  VALIDATION OF STATED PREFERENCE FORECASTING: A CASE STUDY INVOLVING ANGLO-CONTINENTAL FREIGHT , 1997 .

[33]  M. Filippini,et al.  Using stochastic frontier analysis for the access price regulation of electricity networks , 2002 .

[34]  Massimo Filippini *,et al.  Economies of scale and cost efficiency in the postal services: empirical evidence from Switzerland , 2004 .

[35]  D. Levinson,et al.  TRAILS, LANES, OR TRAFFIC: VALUING BICYCLE FACILITIES WITH AN ADAPTIVE STATED PREFERENCE SURVEY , 2007 .

[36]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  Federalism and regional health care expenditures: an empirical analysis for the Swiss cantons. , 2006, Health economics.

[37]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  Estimating the benefits of low flow alleviation in rivers: the case of the Ticino River , 2000 .

[38]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A sequential approach to exploiting the combined strengths of SP and RP data: Application to freight shipper choice , 1994 .

[39]  Joffre Swait,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Relaxing the IID assumption – introducing variants of the MNL model , 2000 .

[40]  Rico Maggi,et al.  Logistics Strategy and Transport Service Choices: An Adaptive Stated Preference Experiment , 2003 .

[41]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Handbook of Transport Modelling , 2000 .

[42]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation , 1997 .

[43]  G. Barone-Adesi Does Volatility Pay , 2000 .

[44]  Rodrigo A. Garrido,et al.  MODELING FREIGHT DEMAND AND SHIPPER BEHAVIOR: STATE OF THE ART, FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2000 .

[45]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change , 1996 .

[46]  M. Farsi Changes in Hospital Quality after Conversion in Ownership Status , 2003, International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics.

[47]  A S Fowkes,et al.  The Leeds Adaptive Stated Preference Methodology , 2002 .