USING THE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT TOOLBOX TO FACILITATE PROCUREMENT: THE CASE OF SMART PUMPS IN A CANADIAN HOSPITAL

Objectives: The aim of this study was to present the experience of a Canadian hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA) unit that performed the traditional functions of the HTA process along with many other activities to facilitate the choice of smart pumps. Methods: A rapid literature review was initiated, but little evidence was found. Moreover, the evidence provided was too far from our hospital context. To help our decision makers, we offered them a list of various services based on the skills of our HTA unit staff. Results: To involve our HTA unit in the choice of the new smart pumps led to a strong collaboration between hospital services. After a rapid review on smart pumps, we proceeded to establish the clinical needs, followed by an evaluation of technical features. To ascertain clinical needs, we participated in the establishment of a conformity list for the tender, a failure and mode-effect analysis, an audit on the use of actual smart pumps, and simulation exercises with nurses and doctors to evaluate the ease of use and ergonomics. With regard to technical tests, these were mainly conducted to identify potential dysfunction and to assess the efficiency of the pump. This experience with smart pumps was useful for evidence-based procurement and led to the formulation of a nine-step process to guide future work. Conclusions: HTA units and agencies are faced with rapid development of new technologies that may not be supported by sufficient amount of pertinent published evidence. Under these circumstances, approaches other than evidence-based selection might provide useful information. Because these activities may be different from those related to classic HTA, this widens the scope of what can be done in HTA to support decision making.

[1]  A. Cicchetti,et al.  The AdHopHTA handbook: a handbook of hospital-based Health Technology Assessment (HB-HTA) , 2015 .

[2]  J Chilcott,et al.  Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review. , 2010, Health technology assessment.

[3]  Finn Børlum Kristensen,et al.  The HTA Core Model: A novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  A Stevens,et al.  Priority setting for health technology assessment. Theoretical considerations and practical approaches. Priority setting Subgroup of the EUR-ASSESS Project. , 1997, International journal of technology assessment in health care.

[5]  Allison Lamsdale,et al.  Applying a Multidisciplinary Approach to the Selection, Evaluation, and Acquisition of Smart Infusion Pumps , 2011 .

[6]  T. Poder,et al.  Quantitative assessment of haemolysis secondary to modern infusion pumps , 2017, Vox sanguinis.

[7]  Wija Oortwijn,et al.  Priority Setting for Health Technology Assessment: Theoretical Considerations and Practical Approaches: A paper produced by the Priority Setting Subgroup of the EUR-ASSESS Project , 1997, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[8]  P. Leong Smart Infusion Pumps: Implementation, Management, and Drug Libraries , 2011 .

[9]  J. Doshi,et al.  International survey of methods used in health technology assessment (HTA): does practice meet the principles proposed for good research? , 2012 .

[10]  Joseph A. Cafazzo,et al.  Do Smart Pumps Actually Reduce Medication Errors , 2010 .

[11]  R. Giffin GLOBAL PRICING POLICIES AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF TRASTUZUMAB IN LATIN AMERICA , 2015, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  Jie He,et al.  New Design of Care: Assessment of an Interdisciplinary Orthopaedic Clinic With a Pivot Nurse in the Province of Quebec , 2010, Orthopedic nursing.

[13]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Using failure mode and effects analysis to plan implementation of smart i.v. pump technology. , 2006, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[14]  S. Bédard,et al.  Processus de validation du questionnaire IPC65 : un outil de mesure de l'interdisciplinarité en pratique clinique , 2013 .

[15]  Top 10 health technology hazards for 2013. , 2012, Health devices.

[16]  T. Poder,et al.  Are drug-coated balloons cost effective for femoropopliteal occlusive disease? A comparison of bare metal stents and uncoated balloons. , 2016, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[17]  Ronald D Snodgrass Smart pump technology. , 2005, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[18]  P. Lehoux,et al.  Redefining health technology assessment in Canada: Diversification of products and contextualization of findings , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[19]  Linda J Murdoch,et al.  Smart infusion technology: a minimum safety standard for intensive care? , 2008, British journal of nursing.

[20]  Finn Børlum Kristensen,et al.  Doing mini–health technology assessments in hospitals: A new concept of decision support in health care? , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[21]  Olivia Dalleur,et al.  Benefits and Risks of Using Smart Pumps to Reduce Medication Error Rates: A Systematic Review , 2014, Drug Safety.

[22]  Tracy Merlin,et al.  WHAT’S IN A NAME? DEVELOPING DEFINITIONS FOR COMMON HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PRODUCT TYPES OF THE INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF AGENCIES FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (INAHTA) , 2014, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[23]  D. Rooney,et al.  Insights from the sharp end of intravenous medication errors: implications for infusion pump technology , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[24]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  High and Rising Health Care Costs. Part 2: Technologic Innovation , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[25]  G. Demirdjian A 10-YEAR HOSPITAL-BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM IN A PUBLIC HOSPITAL IN ARGENTINA , 2015, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[26]  J. Cafazzo,et al.  The impact of traditional and smart pump infusion technology on nurse medication administration performance in a simulated inpatient unit , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[27]  A. Cicchetti,et al.  GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR GOOD PRACTICES IN HOSPITAL-BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT UNITS , 2015, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[28]  P. Borgia,et al.  Health Technology Assessment of the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds: efficacy, safety, cost effectiveness, organizational and ethical impact , 2012, Italian Journal of Public Health.

[29]  Smart Medication Delivery Systems : Infusion Pumps , 2009 .

[30]  P. Prognon,et al.  INTRODUCTION OF INNOVATIVE MEDICAL DEVICES AT FRENCH UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS: AN OVERVIEW OF HOSPITAL-BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT INITIATIVES , 2015, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[31]  T. Poder,et al.  Effect of warming and flow rate conditions of blood warmers on red blood cell integrity , 2016, Vox sanguinis.

[32]  David W. Bates,et al.  A controlled trial of smart infusion pumps to improve medication safety in critically ill patients* , 2005 .

[33]  Theodoros N. Arvanitis,et al.  A systematic review of positron emission tomography (PET) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence. , 2010, Health technology assessment.

[34]  Linda Morgan,et al.  Intelligent infusion , 2009, Nursing management.

[35]  Jacqueline A. Moss,et al.  Smart Pump Technology: What We Have Learned , 2011, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[36]  Americo Cicchetti,et al.  Hospital managers' need for information in decision-making--An interview study in nine European countries. , 2015, Health policy.