Trust and control – a symbiotic relationship?

Traditional approaches to management which incorporate top‐down systems of control do not readily accommodate the need, imposed by a changing business environment, for more flexible methods of harnessing the knowledge and commitment of employees. In this situation, trust has been recognized as an important factor for organizational success but any relaxation of control may be constrained by the demands of accountability to internal and external stakeholders. In this paper, we illustrate the complexity of the relationship between trust and control in the context of corporate governance by examining the internal audit technique of control self‐assessment. We argue that the dependence of control processes on trust has been insufficiently explored and that neglecting to consider the reciprocal nature of trust relationships from an employee perspective may hamper the effectiveness of control systems designed to enhance accountability.

[1]  S. Shapiro.  The Social Control of Impersonal Trust , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  A. Seligman.  Trust and Sociability: On the Limits of Confidence and Role Expectations , 1998 .

[3]  Michael Ivor Reed,et al.  Organization, Trust and Control: A Realist Analysis , 2001 .

[4]  Larry L. Baker,et al.  Control self-assessment , 1996 .

[5]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[6]  Theo Vurdubakis,et al.  Chasing Shadows: Control, Virtuality and the Production of Trust , 2001 .

[7]  Anna‐Maija Lämsä,et al.  The nature of managerial commitment to strategic change , 2000 .

[8]  T. Fogarty,et al.  An empirical evaluation of the interpersonal and organisational correlates of professionalism in internal auditing , 2000 .

[9]  Siegfried Dewitte,et al.  Self-Control and Cooperation: Different Concepts, Similar Decisions? A Question of the Right Perspective , 2001, The Journal of psychology.

[10]  M. Power.  The audit implosion: regulating risk from the inside , 2000 .

[11]  John Roberts,et al.  Trust and Control in Anglo-American Systems of Corporate Governance: The Individualizing and Socializing Effects of Processes of Accountability , 2001 .

[12]  J. Pixley.  Impersonal Trust in Global Mediating Organizations , 1999 .

[13]  M. Power.  The audit society : rituals of verification , 1999 .

[14]  Matthew H. Roy,et al.  Developing Trust: The Importance of Cognitive Flexibility and Co-Operative Contexts , 1998 .

[15]  Matthew R. Fairholm,et al.  Leadership amid the constraints of trust , 2000 .

[16]  W. Morley Lemon,et al.  Developments in the Audit Methodologies of Large Accounting Firms , 2000 .

[17]  Alice Belcher.  Corporate Killing as a Corporate Governance Issue , 2002 .

[18]  Gretchen M. Spreitzer,et al.  Giving Up Control without Losing Control , 1999, Group & Organization Management.

[19]  Steve G. Sutton,et al.  Defrauding the Public Interest: A Critical Examination of Reengineered Audit Processes and the Likelihood of Detecting Fraud , 2002 .

[20]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Trust in Large Organizations , 1996 .

[21]  G. Morgan.  Internal Audit Role Conflict: A Pluralist View , 1980 .

[22]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Trust and control: A dialectic link , 2000, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[23]  B. Husted.  The Ethical Limits of Trust in Business Relations , 1998, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[24]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[25]  Bernard Barber,et al.  The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .