Performance of direct methanol fuel cells prepared by hot-pressed MEA and catalyst-coated membrane (CCM)

Abstract The effect of the fabrication methods of the conventional hot-pressed membrane–electrode-assembly (hot-pressed MEA) and catalyst-coated membrane (CCM) on the utilization efficiency of Pt electrocatalysts, methanol crossover and performance of direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs) is studied under the condition of the same Pt electrocatalysts loading. Cyclic voltammetric and electrochemical impedance studies showed that the cell with CCM exhibited significantly higher electrochemical surface area and lower electrode polarization resistance for the methanol oxidation reaction, in comparison to that with the hot-pressed MEA. Compared with the hot-pressed MEA, the methanol crossover of the cell with CCM is decreased by 55% and the power density of DMFC is enhanced by 36%. The improvement of the DMFCs with CCM is probably due to the significantly higher electrochemical reaction sites and the increased three-phase boundaries through the reduction in the loss of the Pt electrocatalysts in the gas diffusion layers and enhanced electrode/membrane interface.

[1]  P. Pickup,et al.  Modification of Nafion Proton Exchange Membranes to Reduce Methanol Crossover in PEM Fuel Cells , 1999 .

[2]  T. Zhao,et al.  Preparation and characterization of a PtRu/C nanocatalyst for direct methanol fuel cells , 2005 .

[3]  E. Gonzalez,et al.  Effect of operational parameters of mini-direct methanol fuel cells operating at ambient temperature , 2006 .

[4]  S. Jiang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of platinum catalysts on multiwalled carbon nanotubes by intermittent microwave irradiation for fuel cell applications. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[5]  R. Savinell,et al.  Evaluation of a Sol-Gel Derived Nafion/Silica Hybrid Membrane for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Applications: II. Methanol Uptake and Methanol Permeability , 2001 .

[6]  T. Lim,et al.  Nano-structured Pt–Cr anode catalyst over carbon support, for direct methanol fuel cell , 2006 .

[7]  A new direct methanol fuel cell with a zigzag-folded membrane electrode assembly , 2005 .

[8]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  Thin-film catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cell electrodes , 1992 .

[9]  Songtao Li,et al.  Preparation and simulation of an additional catalyst layer for direct methanol fuel cell , 2006 .

[10]  Development of High Performance Micro DMFCS and a DMFC Stack , 2005 .

[11]  C. Zeng,et al.  Electrochemical impedance spectra for the corrosion of two-phase Cu-15Al alloy in eutectic (Li, K)2CO3 at 650 °C in air , 2004 .

[12]  In-Hwan Oh,et al.  Operational characteristics of a 50 W DMFC stack , 2006 .

[13]  Suli Wang,et al.  Performance Improvement in Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Cathode Using High Mesoporous Area Catalyst Support , 2005 .

[14]  Kaspar Andreas Friedrich,et al.  Preparation of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells by Defined Multilayer Structures , 2005 .

[15]  San Ping Jiang,et al.  Self-Assembly of PDDA-Pt Nanoparticle∕Nafion Membranes for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells , 2005 .

[16]  R. Parsons,et al.  The oxidation of small organic molecules: A survey of recent fuel cell related research , 1988 .

[17]  S. Jiang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of PDDA-stabilized Pt nanoparticles for direct methanol fuel cells , 2006 .

[18]  Ay Su,et al.  Effect of Operating Parameters on the DMFC Performance , 2005 .

[19]  Edson A. Ticianelli,et al.  Oxygen electrocatalysis on thin porous coating rotating platinum electrodes , 1998 .

[20]  Lei Zhang,et al.  A review of anode catalysis in the direct methanol fuel cell , 2006 .

[21]  Shichun Mu,et al.  Au nanoparticles self-assembled onto Nafion membranes for use as methanol-blocking barriers , 2005 .

[22]  H. Ha,et al.  Investigation of oxygen gain in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells , 2004 .

[23]  Wenhua Huang,et al.  A Methanol Impermeable Proton Conducting Composite Electrolyte System , 1995 .

[24]  U. Hoffmann,et al.  On the question of MEA preparation for DMFCs , 2004 .

[25]  Qin Xin,et al.  Direct methanol fuel cells: The effect of electrode fabrication procedure on MEAs structural properties and cell performance , 2005 .

[26]  Chaoyang Wang,et al.  Variations in interfacial properties during cell conditioning and influence of heat-treatment of ionomer on the characteristics of direct methanol fuel cells , 2005 .

[27]  S. Srinivasan,et al.  Composite Nafion/Zirconium Phosphate Membranes for Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Operation at High Temperature , 2001 .

[28]  M. Ciureanu,et al.  Electrochemical Impedance Study of Electrode‐Membrane Assemblies in PEM Fuel Cells: I. Electro‐oxidation of H 2 and H 2 / CO Mixtures on Pt‐Based Gas‐Diffusion Electrodes , 1999 .

[29]  C. Y. Chen,et al.  Characterization of electrode structures and the related performance of direct methanol fuel cells , 2005 .

[30]  P. Pickup,et al.  Effect of Hot Pressing on the Performance of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells , 2004 .

[31]  Antonino S. Aricò,et al.  DMFCs: From Fundamental Aspects to Technology Development , 2001 .

[32]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  Low platinum loading electrodes for polymer electrolyte fuel cells fabricated using thermoplastic ionomers , 1995 .

[33]  Hubert A. Gasteiger,et al.  Dependence of PEM fuel cell performance on catalyst loading , 2004 .

[34]  San Ping Jiang,et al.  Layer‐by‐Layer Self‐Assembly of Composite Polyelectrolyte–Nafion Membranes for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells , 2006 .

[35]  John Davey,et al.  Recent advances in direct methanol fuel cells at Los Alamos National Laboratory , 2000 .