Probe Sampling Strategies for Traffic Monitoring Systems Based on Wireless Location Technology

Transportation agencies have become very interested in traffic monitoring systems based on wireless location technology (WLT) since they offer the potential of collecting travel time data across a wide portion of the road system. Prior tests of WLT-based systems have been unsuccessful, in part because they have treated the road network as a homogeneous entity. This “area-wide” method has inherent limitations, causing congested roadways to be over sampled and uncongested and low volume roads to be under sampled. This project developed a methodology to estimate sampling parameters based on localized traffic conditions in the network, termed a “zonal approach.” In zonal WLT systems, the roadway network is disaggregated into smaller areas, termed “zones,” based on cellular coverage areas. In this research, two zonal sampling strategies were examined and tested using three simulated networks. When the road network is complex, the zonal priority sampling strategy was found to distribute probes throughout the network and produced a larger number of speed estimates on uncongested and low volume roads. Moreover, the zonal priority strategy improved speed estimation accuracy by 10% over the other two sampling strategies. For networks with simple geometry or uniform congested traffic conditions, there were no significant differences among the sampling strategies. The results of this research indicate that the homogeneous approach used by earlier deployments has limitations, and results could be potentially improved by tailoring sampling parameters to a more localized level.

[1]  Karthik K. Srinivasan,et al.  Determination of Number of Probe Vehicles Required for Reliable Travel Time Measurement in Urban Network , 1996 .

[2]  Bell Atlantic Nynex Mobile Final evaluation report for the CAPITAL-ITS operational test and demonstration program , 1997 .

[3]  Randall Cayford,et al.  Investigation of Vehicles as Probes Using Global Positioning System and Cellular Phone Tracking: Field Operational Test , 2001 .

[4]  Michael L Pack,et al.  TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS OF ANONYMOUS MOBILE CALL SAMPLING , 2001 .

[5]  Tae-Kyung Sung,et al.  Development of a map matching method using the multiple hypothesis technique , 2001, ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585).

[6]  Randall Cayford,et al.  OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS AFFECTING THE USE OF ANONYMOUS CELL PHONE TRACKING FOR GENERATING TRAFFIC INFORMATION , 2003 .

[7]  Brian L. Smith,et al.  Investigation of Dynamic Probe Sample Requirements for Traffic Condition Monitoring , 2004 .

[8]  Partha Chakroborty,et al.  Using Bus Travel Time Data to Estimate Travel Times on Urban Corridors , 2004 .

[9]  Brian Lee Smith,et al.  IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC MONITORING BASED ON WIRELESS LOCATION TECHNOLOGY , 2004 .

[10]  Han Zhang,et al.  Wireless Location Technology-Based Traffic Monitoring: Critical Assessment and Evaluation of an Early-Generation System , 2004 .

[11]  J A Misener,et al.  VEHICLE-INFRASTRUCTURE INTEGRATION (VII) AND SAFETY: RUBBER AND RADIO MEETS THE ROAD IN CALIFORNIA , 2005 .

[12]  Brian Lee Smith,et al.  Wireless Location Technology–Based Traffic Monitoring , 2007 .