Virtual Globes: Serving Science and Society

Virtual Globes reached the mass market in 2005. They created multi-million dollar businesses in a very short time by providing novel ways to explore data geographically. We use the term “Virtual Globes” as the common denominator for technologies offering capabilities to annotate, edit and publish geographic information to a world-wide audience and to visualize information provided by the public and private sectors, as well as by citizens who volunteer new data. Unfortunately, but not surprising for a new trend or paradigm, overlapping terms such as “Virtual Globes”, “Digital Earth”, “Geospatial Web”, “Geoportal” or software specific terms are used heterogeneously. We analyze the terminologies and trends in scientific publications and ask whether these developments serve science and society. While usage can be answered quantitatively, the authors reason from the literature studied that these developments serve to educate the masses and may help to democratize geographic information by extending the producer base. We believe that we can contribute to a better distinction between software centered terms and the generic concept as such. The power of the visual, coupled with the potential of spatial analysis and modeling for public and private purposes raises new issues of reliability, standards, privacy and best practice. This is increasingly addressed in scientific literature but the required body of knowledge is still in its infancy.

[1]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  What does Google Earth Mean for the Social Sciences , 2008 .

[2]  P. Torrens Geography and computational social science , 2010 .

[3]  D. O'Sullivan Geographical information science: critical GIS , 2006 .

[4]  A. MacEachren Cartography and GIS: facilitating collaboration , 2000 .

[5]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Managing Geographic Information Systems , 1994 .

[6]  M. J. Kraak Why Maps Matter in GIScience , 2006 .

[7]  V. Gewin Mapping opportunities , 2004, Nature.

[8]  Andrew Hudson-Smith,et al.  NeoGeography and Web 2.0: concepts, tools and applications , 2009, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[9]  Bertrand De Longueville,et al.  Community-based geoportals: The next generation? Concepts and methods for the geospatial Web 2.0 , 2010, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[10]  S. Chainey,et al.  GIS and Crime Mapping , 2005 .

[11]  J. Pickles Representations in an Electronic Age: Geography, GIS, and Democracy , 1995 .

[12]  N. Obermeyer GIS: The Maturation of a Profession , 2007 .

[13]  Matthew Zook,et al.  Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in post-Katrina Google Earth , 2009 .

[14]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  The Precautionary Principle in the Information Society Effects of Pervasive Computing on Health and Environment , 2005 .

[15]  John Krygier Geographic Information Systems: The Microcomputer And Modern Cartography , 1991 .

[16]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Can Online Map-Based Applications Improve Citizen Participation? , 2005, TCGOV.

[17]  Petr Cizek,et al.  The ethics of Google Earth: crossing thresholds from spatial data to landscape visualisation. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  S. Elwood Volunteered geographic information: future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS , 2008 .

[19]  Pragya Agarwal,et al.  Ontological considerations in GIScience , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[20]  M. Pavlovskaya Theorizing with GIS: A Tool for Critical Geographies? , 2006 .

[21]  Arno Scharl Towards the Geospatial Web: Media Platforms for Managing Geotagged Knowledge Repositories , 2007, The Geospatial Web.

[22]  J. Nouwt Reasonable expectations of geo-privacy? , 2008 .

[23]  Michael T. Jones,et al.  T the Five W's Where Is Where? Google's Geospatial Organizing Principle____________ Visualization Viewpoints Editor's Note , 2022 .

[24]  R. Sieber Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework , 2006 .

[25]  Mark Weiser The computer for the 21st century , 1991 .

[26]  Francis Harvey More than Names - Digital Earth and/or Virtual Globes? , 2009, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[27]  Terry A. Slocum,et al.  Cartographic Data Display , 1991 .

[28]  M. Goodchild,et al.  A tetradic analysis of GIS and society using McLuhan's law of the media , 2003 .

[29]  Stuart C. Aitken,et al.  Public participation, technological discourses and the scale of GIS , 2002 .

[30]  Nadine Schuurman,et al.  Formalization Matters: Critical GIS and Ontology Research , 2006 .

[31]  Claude Caron,et al.  GIScience Journals Ranking and Evaluation: An International Delphi Study , 2008, Trans. GIS.

[32]  Michael F Goodchild,et al.  Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities , 2010, GeoJournal.

[33]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Defining a Digital Earth System , 2008, Trans. GIS.

[34]  Miles Taylor Book Review: John Morrow, History of Political Thought: A Thematic Introduction (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1998), pp. 417, $55.95 , 1999 .

[35]  Alex Singleton,et al.  Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the GeoWeb , 2008 .

[36]  David M. Mark,et al.  Next-Generation Digital Earth: A position paper from the Vespucci Initiative for the Advancement of Geographic Information Science , 2008, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[37]  M. Goodchild GIScience, Geography, Form, and Process , 2004 .

[38]  S. Radcliffe National maps, digitalisation and neoliberal cartographies: transforming nation‐state practices and symbols in postcolonial Ecuador , 2009 .

[39]  J. Krygier,et al.  An Introduction to Critical Cartography , 2005 .

[40]  Sarah Elwood,et al.  Geographic Information Science: new geovisualization technologies — emerging questions and linkages with GIScience research , 2009 .

[41]  Henk J. Scholten,et al.  Geospatial Technology and the Role of Location in Science , 2009 .

[42]  John A. Lever Unintended consequences of the Global Positioning System , 2004, Syst. Eng..

[43]  Daniel Z. Sui Terrae Incognitae and Limits of Computation: Whither GIScience? , 2001 .

[44]  B. Warf,et al.  Introduction: the reinsertion of space in the humanities and social sciences , 2009 .

[45]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Geographic Information Systems and Science (second edition) , 2001 .

[46]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  GIS: stressing the geographical , 2004 .

[47]  M. Weiser The Computer for the Twenty-First Century , 1991 .

[48]  Thomas Blaschke Geographische informationssysteme: Vom werkzeug zur methode , 2003 .

[49]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Demystifying the Persistent Ambiguity of GIS as ‘Tool’ versus ‘Science’ , 1997 .

[50]  J. Kerski,et al.  The Use of Virtual Globes as a Spatial Teaching Tool with Suggestions for Metadata Standards , 2008 .

[51]  J. Pickles Tool or Science? GIS, Technoscience, and the Theoretical Turn , 1997 .

[52]  L. Jesse Rouse,et al.  Participating in the Geospatial Web: Collaborative Mapping, Social Networks and Participatory GIS , 2007, The Geospatial Web.

[53]  Onno Boonstra No Place in History – Geo-ICT and Historical Science , 2009 .

[54]  N. Schuurman Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s , 2000 .

[55]  Kirsi Virrantaus,et al.  ICA Research Agenda on Cartography and Geographic Information Science , 2009, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[56]  Milton Halem,et al.  Digital Earth , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries.

[57]  Dirk Tiede,et al.  Analytical 3D views and virtual globes - scientific results in a familiar spatial context , 2010 .

[58]  P. Fisher,et al.  Re-presenting Geographical Information Systems , 2005 .

[59]  Frank Stajano,et al.  Location Privacy in Pervasive Computing , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[60]  M. Goodchild The Validity and Usefulness of Laws in Geographic Information Science and Geography , 2004 .

[61]  Rita Colwell,et al.  The New Landscape of Science: A Geographic Portal , 2004, Annals of the Association of American Geographers.

[62]  Marc P. Armstrong,et al.  Geographic Information Technologies and Personal Privacy , 2005, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[63]  M. Goodchild Commentary: whither VGI? , 2008 .

[64]  Declan Butler,et al.  Virtual globes: The web-wide world , 2006, Nature.

[65]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  The Precautionary Principle in the Information Society , 2004 .

[66]  H. Onsrud,et al.  Protecting personal privacy in using geographic information systems , 1994 .

[67]  Ron Johnston,et al.  GIS and Geography , 1995 .

[68]  G. Brent Hall,et al.  Landscape Grammar 1: Spatial Grammar Theory and Landscape Planning , 2005 .

[69]  P. Walsh The Power of Maps. , 1998 .

[70]  Klaus Greve,et al.  Requirements for Next Generation Spatial Data Infrastructures‐Standardized Web Based Geoprocessing and Web Service Orchestration , 2007, Trans. GIS.

[71]  A. Turner,et al.  Introduction to neogeography , 2006 .

[72]  T. Harris,et al.  The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the Future of Humanities Scholarship , 2010 .

[73]  R. Jennings,et al.  The maturation of a profession. , 2004 .

[74]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  The impact of the Internet on human activity–travel patterns: analysis of gender differences using multi-group structural equation models , 2009 .

[75]  Daniel Z. Sui,et al.  The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie's new tattoo and the future of GIS , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..