A comparison of harmonic modeling methods with application to control of switched systems with active filtering

Many harmonic modeling approaches have been introduced in the literature, such as generalized state-space averaging, dynamic phasors, extended harmonic domain, and harmonic state-space. They are capable of capturing both the transient evolution and the steady-state of harmonics. They model the frequency coupling nature of a system and can expose the frequency couplings within interconnected components. By these modeling techniques, a linear time-periodic system can be converted into a linear time-invariant system, which allows the use of traditional analysis and control methods. This paper presents a state of the art of harmonic modeling approaches. Its contribution is to clearly establish the links between the different approaches, in particular through the specification of the decomposition of non-periodic signals in generalized Fourier series with time-varying coefficients. This paper also shows the advantages of harmonic modeling to analyse the frequency couplings within associated systems and to the control with active filtering.

[1]  Slobodan Cuk,et al.  A general unified approach to modelling switching-converter power stages , 1976, 1970 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[2]  James Ernest Ormrod Harmonic state space modelling of voltage source converters , 2013 .

[3]  S. Bittanti,et al.  Periodic Systems: Filtering and Control , 2008 .

[4]  G. Hill On the part of the motion of the lunar perigee which is a function of the mean motions of the sun and moon , 1886 .

[5]  M. S. Hwang,et al.  Harmonic State-Space modelling of an HVdc converter , 2012, 2012 IEEE 15th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power.

[6]  Pedro Rodriguez,et al.  Single-Phase Modeling Approach in Dynamic Harmonic Domain , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  J. M. Noworolski,et al.  Generalized averaging method for power conversion circuits , 1990, 21st Annual IEEE Conference on Power Electronics Specialists.

[8]  E. Mollerstedt,et al.  Out of control because of harmonics-an analysis of the harmonic response of an inverter locomotive , 2000, IEEE Control Systems.

[9]  Enrique Acha,et al.  Dynamic harmonic evolution using the extended harmonic domain , 2003 .

[10]  P. Mattavelli,et al.  Modeling and analysis of FACTS devices with dynamic phasors , 2000, 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37077).

[11]  N. Wereley,et al.  Linear Time Periodic Systems: Transfer Function, Poles, Transmission Zeroes and Directional Properties , 1991, 1991 American Control Conference.

[12]  A. Ramirez,et al.  Dynamic Harmonic Domain Modeling of Transients in Three-Phase Transmission Lines , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[13]  Drazen Dujic,et al.  Arbitrary order generalized state space average modeling of switching converters , 2015, 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[14]  George C. Verghese,et al.  Phasor dynamics of thyristor-controlled series capacitor systems , 1997 .

[15]  G. Floquet,et al.  Sur les équations différentielles linéaires à coefficients périodiques , 1883 .

[16]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Analysis and control of linear periodically time varying systems , 1990 .

[17]  Manuel Madrigal Martinez Modelling of power electronics controllers for harmonic analysis in power systems , 2001 .

[18]  Abner Ramirez,et al.  The Modified Harmonic Domain: Interharmonics , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[19]  Slobodan Cuk,et al.  Large-signal modelling and analysis of switching regulators , 1982, 1982 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists conference.

[20]  Emmanuel Godoy,et al.  Harmonic state space feedback control for AC/DC power converters , 2017, 2017 American Control Conference (ACC).

[21]  Jamal Daafouz,et al.  Robust stabilization of switched affine systems with unknown parameters and its application to DC/DC Flyback converters , 2017, 2017 American Control Conference (ACC).