Spatial-Temporal Features Based Sensor Network Partition in Dam Safety Monitoring System

Many various types of sensors have been installed to monitor the deformation and stress in the dam structure. It is difficult to directly evaluate the operation status of the dam structure based on the massive monitoring data. The sensor network is divided into multiple regions according to the design specifications, simulation data, and engineering experiences. The local results from sub-regions are integrated to achieve overall evaluation. However, it ignores the spatial distribution of sensors and the variation of time series, which cannot meet the real-time evaluation for the dam safety monitoring. If the network partitions can provide the preliminary foundation for analyzing the dynamic change laws of the dam’s working conditions in a real-way, we should consider the similarity of structure and stresses in the local region of the dam and the correlation among the monitoring data. A time-series denoising autoencoder (TSDA) is proposed to represent the spatial and temporal features of the nodes by compressing high-dimensional monitoring data. Then, a network partitioning algorithm (NPA) based on spatial-temporal features based on the TSDA is presented. The NPA ensures that the partition results can support the analysis of the physical change laws by introducing the auxiliary objective variable to optimize the network partition objective function. Experimental results on the public datasets and a real dataset from an arch dam demonstrate that the proposed network partition algorithm NPA can achieve better partition performance than TSDA+K-Means and TSDA+GMM. The NPA can improve the silhouette coefficient by 45.1% and 58.4% higher than the TSDA+K-Means and TSDA+GMM, respectively. The NPA can increase the Calinski-Harabaz Index by 30.8% and 61.6%, respectively.

[1]  Kilian Q. Weinberger,et al.  Marginalized Denoising Autoencoders for Domain Adaptation , 2012, ICML.

[2]  R. Ramya,et al.  An Adaptive Segmentation Method Based on Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) Clustering for DNA Microarray , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Computing Applications.

[3]  Nan Zheng,et al.  Approximative Network Partitioning for MFDs from Stationary Sensor Data , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[4]  Diego Reforgiato Recupero,et al.  Internet of Entities (IoE): A Blockchain-based Distributed Paradigm for Data Exchange between Wireless-based Devices , 2019, SENSORNETS.

[5]  Feiping Nie,et al.  Unsupervised Feature Selection via Unified Trace Ratio Formulation and K-means Clustering (TRACK) , 2014, ECML/PKDD.

[6]  Guojun Wang,et al.  Event Detection Through Differential Pattern Mining in Cyber-Physical Systems , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Big Data.

[7]  Yingchi Mao,et al.  DNN-MVL: DNN-Multi-View-Learning-Based Recover Block Missing Data in a Dam Safety Monitoring System , 2019, Sensors.

[8]  Chenglin Miao,et al.  Towards Quality Aware Information Integration in Distributed Sensing Systems , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[9]  Qinghua Hu,et al.  Subspace clustering guided unsupervised feature selection , 2017, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  Jiayu Zhou,et al.  Learning A Task-Specific Deep Architecture For Clustering , 2015, SDM.

[11]  Wenlong Huang,et al.  Semi-supervised Artificial Immune Mixture Models Clustering , 2016 .

[12]  Zhuo Chen,et al.  Deep clustering: Discriminative embeddings for segmentation and separation , 2015, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[13]  Z. Zivkovic Improved adaptive Gaussian mixture model for background subtraction , 2004, ICPR 2004.

[14]  Huaizhi Su,et al.  Multisource information fusion‐based approach diagnosing structural behavior of dam engineering , 2018 .

[15]  Enhong Chen,et al.  Learning Deep Representations for Graph Clustering , 2014, AAAI.

[16]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Discriminative K-means for Clustering , 2007, NIPS.

[17]  Dhruv Batra,et al.  Joint Unsupervised Learning of Deep Representations and Image Clusters , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[18]  George Trigeorgis,et al.  A Deep Semi-NMF Model for Learning Hidden Representations , 2014, ICML.

[19]  Yu Xiang,et al.  A Data Stream Subspace Clustering Algorithm Based on Region Partition , 2014 .

[20]  Cheng Deng,et al.  Deep Clustering via Joint Convolutional Autoencoder Embedding and Relative Entropy Minimization , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[21]  Limin Sun,et al.  Structural health monitoring by using a sparse coding-based deep learning algorithm with wireless sensor networks , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[22]  Zoran Zivkovic,et al.  Improved adaptive Gaussian mixture model for background subtraction , 2004, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004..

[23]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Stacked Denoising Autoencoders: Learning Useful Representations in a Deep Network with a Local Denoising Criterion , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[24]  Vangelis Karkaletsis,et al.  Autoencoder-Driven Weather Clustering for Source Estimation during Nuclear Events , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  Chunhua Su,et al.  A physiological and behavioral feature authentication scheme for medical cloud based on fuzzy-rough core vector machine , 2020, Inf. Sci..

[26]  Robert Jenssen,et al.  Time Series Cluster Kernel for Learning Similarities between Multivariate Time Series with Missing Data , 2017, Pattern Recognit..

[27]  Simon Fong,et al.  A Joint Optimization Framework of Sparse Coding and Discriminative Clustering , 2015, IJCAI.

[28]  Luis Rodrigues,et al.  Resource Allocation Model for Sensor Clouds under the Sensing as a Service Paradigm , 2019, Comput..

[29]  Vasudha Vashisht,et al.  Soft Computing Paradigms Based Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey , 2020 .

[30]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Approximative Network Partitioning for MFDs from Stationary Sensor Data , 2019 .