论文信息 - Reply to “Comment on ‘Past of a quantum particle revisited’ ”

Reply to “Comment on ‘Past of a quantum particle revisited’ ”

We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126 (2017). In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.

Yink Loong Len | H. Ng | B. Englert | Jibo Dai | Kelvin Horia

[1] L. Vaidman,et al. Comment on “Past of a quantum particle revisited” , 2018, Physical Review A.

[2] Yink Loong Len,et al. Past of a quantum particle revisited , 2017 .

[3] Y. Aharonov,et al. ABOUT POSITION MEASUREMENTS WHICH DO NOT SHOW THE BOHMIAN PARTICLE POSITION , 1995, quant-ph/9511005.

[4] Berthold-Georg Englert,et al. Surrealistic Bohm Trajectories , 1992 .