Deciding on the Data: Epistemological Problems Surrounding Instruments and Research Techniques in Cell Biology

The question whether research techniques are producing artifacts or data is often a crucial one for scientists. The potential for artifacts results from the fact that generating data often requires numerous procedures that are often brutal, poorly understood, and very sensitive to details of the procedure. Through a case-study of the introduction of electron microscopy as a tool for studying cells, I examine how scientists judge whether new techniques are introducing artifacts. Three factors seem to be most salient in their judgments: determinateness of the results, consilience of different procedures, and ability of the results to fit into emerging theories.

[1]  L. H. Bretschneider,et al.  The Electron-Microscopic Investigation of Tissue Sections , 1952 .

[2]  L.G.E. Bell,et al.  The Application of Freezing and Drying Techniques in Cytology , 1952 .

[3]  William Bechtel,et al.  Integrating sciences by creating new disciplines: The case of cell biology , 1993 .

[4]  Fritiof S. Sjöstrand,et al.  The Ultrastructure of Cells as Revealed by the Electron Microscope , 1956 .

[5]  L. Marton,et al.  Early History of the Electron Microscope , 1968 .

[6]  R. Wyckoff Optical Methods in Cytology , 1959 .

[7]  G. Palade,et al.  The fine structure of mitochondria , 1952, The Anatomical record.

[8]  A. Claude,et al.  A STUDY OF TISSUE CULTURE CELLS BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPY , 1945, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  A. Claude,et al.  The nature of the Golgi apparatus. I. Parallelism between intercellular myelin figures and Golgi apparatus in somatic cells , 1949, Journal of morphology.

[10]  A. Dalton,et al.  Electron Microscopy of Tissue Sections , 1953 .

[11]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[12]  H. Fernández-Morán,et al.  The submicroscopic organization of vertebrate nerve fibres: An electron microscope study of myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibres , 1952 .

[13]  D. Keilin,et al.  Activity of the succinic dehydrogenase-cytochrome system in different tissue preparations. , 1949, The Biochemical journal.

[14]  K. Porter,et al.  SIGNIFICANCE OF CELL PARTICULATES AS SEEN BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPY , 1952, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  R. R. Bensley Facts versus artefacts in cytology: The Golgi apparatus , 1951 .

[16]  J. Barcroft Biochemistry and Morphogenesis , 1943, Nature.

[17]  J. D. Robertson The early days of electron microscopy of nerve tissue and membranes. , 1987, International review of cytology.

[18]  K. Porter,et al.  A study in microtomy for electron microscopy , 1953, The Anatomical record.

[19]  K. Porter,et al.  ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF BASOPHILIC COMPONENTS OF CYTOPLASM , 1954, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[20]  R. Wyckoff,et al.  The Thickness of Electron Microscopic Objects , 1944 .

[21]  A. Claude,et al.  The nature of the Golgi apparatus. II. Identification of the Golgi apparatus with a complex of myelin figures , 1949 .

[22]  Philip Siekevitz,et al.  Liver microsomes; an integrated morphological and biochemical study. , 1956 .

[23]  F. S. Sjostrand Electron Microscopy of Mitochondria and Cytoplasmic Double Membranes: Systems of Double Membranes in the Cytoplasm of Certain Tissue Cell , 1953, Nature.