The mouse beam walking assay offers improved sensitivity over the mouse rotarod in determining motor coordination deficits induced by benzodiazepines

The mouse rotarod test of motor coordination/sedation is commonly used to predict clinical sedation caused by novel drugs. However, past experience suggests that it lacks the desired degree of sensitivity to be predictive of effects in humans. For example, the benzodiazepine, bretazenil, showed little impairment of mouse rotarod performance, but marked sedation in humans. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the mouse beam walking assay demonstrates: (i) an increased sensitivity over the rotarod and (ii) an increased ability to predict clinically sedative doses of benzodiazepines. The study compared the effects of the full benzodiazepine agonists, diazepam and lorazepam, and the partial agonist, bretazenil, on the mouse rotarod and beam walking assays. Diazepam and lorazepam significantly impaired rotarod performance, although relatively high GABA-A receptor occupancy was required (72% and 93%, respectively), whereas beam walking performance was significantly affected at approximately 30% receptor occupancy. Bretazenil produced significant deficits at 90% and 53% receptor occupancy on the rotarod and beam walking assays, respectively. The results suggest that the mouse beam walking assay is a more sensitive tool for determining benzodiazepine-induced motor coordination deficits than the rotarod. Furthermore, the GABA-A receptor occupancy values at which significant deficits were determined in the beam walking assay are comparable with those observed in clinical positron emission tomography studies using sedative doses of benzodiazepines. These data suggest that the beam walking assay may be able to more accurately predict the clinically sedative doses of novel benzodiazepine-like drugs.

[1]  D. Nutt,et al.  The psychobiology of anxiolytic drug. Part 2: Pharmacological treatments of anxiety. , 2000, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[2]  B. Fredholm,et al.  MRI Evaluation and Functional Assessment of Brain Injury After Hypoxic Ischemia in Neonatal Mice , 2002, Stroke.

[3]  C. Sánchez,et al.  Rotarod studies in the rat of the GABAA receptor agonist gaboxadol: lack of ethanol potentiation and benzodiazepine cross-tolerance. , 2003, European journal of pharmacology.

[4]  S. Stewart,et al.  Cognitive and sedative effects of benzodiazepine use. , 2002, Current pharmaceutical design.

[5]  E. Sellers,et al.  Pharmacologic effects and abuse liability of bretazenil, diazepam, and alprazolam in humans , 1994, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[6]  G. Perrault,et al.  SL651498: An Anxioselective Compound with Functional Selectivity for α2- and α3-Containing γ-Aminobutyric AcidA (GABAA) Receptors , 2001 .

[7]  G. Bentley,et al.  Comparison of benzodiazepine (BZ) receptor agonists in two rodent activity tests , 1996, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[8]  S. Qian,et al.  Transgenic mice expressing the PS1-A246E mutation: effects on spatial learning, exploration, anxiety, and motor coordination , 2003, Behavioural Brain Research.

[9]  G. Sedvall,et al.  Occupancy of the central benzodiazepine receptors during benzodiazepine treatment determined by PET , 1991, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[10]  W. Haefely,et al.  Pharmacological characterization of benzodiazepine receptor ligands with intrinsic efficacies ranging from high to zero , 2005, Psychopharmacology.

[11]  R. Gieschke,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of bretazenil and diazepam with alcohol. , 2003, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[12]  F. Wahl,et al.  Assessment of Sensorimotor and Cognitive Deficits Induced by a Moderate Traumatic Injury in the Right Parietal Cortex of the Rat , 2001, Neurobiology of Disease.

[13]  R. Mckernan,et al.  Regional differences in the inhibition of mouse in vivo [3H]Ro 15-1788 binding reflect selectivity for alpha 1 versus alpha 2 and alpha 3 subunit-containing GABAA receptors. , 1999, Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

[14]  W. Haefely,et al.  Novel anxiolytics that act as partial agonists at benzodiazepine receptors. , 1990, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[15]  D. Nutt,et al.  Benzodiazepine Site Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Quantification in Man: Direct Measurement of Drug Occupancy and Effects on the Human Brain In Vivo , 1996, Neuropharmacology.

[16]  R. Mckernan,et al.  Regional Differences in the Inhibition of Mouse In Vivo [3H]Ro 15-1788 Binding Reflect Selectivity for α1 versus α2 and α3 Subunit-Containing GABAA Receptors , 1999, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[17]  James N. Davis,et al.  Beam-walking in rats: studies towards developing an animal model of functional recovery after brain injury , 1990, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  D. Nutt,et al.  The psychobiology of anxiolytic drugs. Part 1: Basic neurobiology. , 2000, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[19]  D. M. Feeney,et al.  Amphetamine, haloperidol, and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. , 1982, Science.