Conforming Discretizations of Boundary Element Solutions of the Electroencephalography Forward Problem

In this paper we present a new discretization strategy for the boundary element formulation of the Electroencephalography (EEG) forward problem. Boundary integral formulations, classically solved with the Boundary Element Method (BEM), are widely used in high resolution EEG imaging because of their recognized advantages in several real case scenarios. Unfortunately however, it is widely reported that the accuracy of standard BEM schemes is limited, especially when the current source density is dipolar and its location approaches one of the brain boundary surfaces. This is a particularly limiting problem given that during an high-resolution EEG imaging procedure, several EEG forward problem solutions are required for which the source currents are near or on top of a boundary surface. This work will first present an analysis of standardly discretized EEG forward problems, reporting on a theoretical issue of some of the formulations that have been used so far in the community. We report on the fact that several standardly used discretizations requires the expansion term to be a square integrable function. Instead, those techniques are not consistent when a more appropriate mapping is considered. Such a mapping allows the expansion function term to be a less regular function, thus sensibly reducing the need for mesh refinements and low-precisions handling strategies that are currently required. These mappings, however, require a different and conforming discretization which must be suitably adapted to them. To do this we adopt a mixed discretization based on dual boundary elements residing on a suitably defined dual mesh. Finally we show how the resulting EEG problems has favorable properties with respect to previously proposed schemes and we show their applicability to real case modeling scenarios obtained from MRI data.

[1]  M. Fuchs,et al.  An improved boundary element method for realistic volume-conductor modeling , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Bin He,et al.  Estimating cortical potentials from scalp EEGs in a realistically shaped inhomogeneous head model by means of the boundary element method , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Akihisa Okumura,et al.  Neonatal EEG: a powerful tool in the assessment of brain damage in preterm infants , 1999, Brain and Development.

[4]  P. Ylä‐Oijala,et al.  Conforming boundary element methods in acoustics , 2015 .

[5]  B Yvert,et al.  Fast realistic modeling in bioelectromagnetism using lead‐field interpolation , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[7]  J. Nédélec Acoustic and Electromagnetic Equations : Integral Representations for Harmonic Problems , 2001 .

[8]  Jussi Rahola,et al.  Iterative Solution of Dense Linear Systems Arising from Integral Equations , 1998, PARA.

[9]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  BrainVoyager — Past, present, future , 2012, NeuroImage.

[10]  Silau Am,et al.  Normal prenatal development of the human parietal bone and interparietal suture. , 1995 .

[11]  J. D. Munck The potential distribution in a layered anisotropic spheroidal volume conductor , 1988 .

[12]  W. van Drongelen,et al.  Estimation of in vivo brain-to-skull conductivity ratio in humans. , 2006, Applied physics letters.

[13]  L. Ernst,et al.  Color Atlas of Fetal and Neonatal Histology , 2011 .

[14]  Fetsje Bijma,et al.  In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and realistic models for the head , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  D. A. Dunavant High degree efficient symmetrical Gaussian quadrature rules for the triangle , 1985 .

[16]  J. D. Munck A linear discretization of the volume conductor boundary integral equation using analytically integrated elements (electrophysiology application) , 1992 .

[17]  J. Sarvas Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  BrainSuite: An Automated Cortical Surface Identification Tool , 2000, MICCAI.

[19]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG , 2016, NeuroImage.

[20]  Roberto D. Graglia,et al.  On the numerical integration of the linear shape functions times the 3-D Green's function or its gradient on a plane triangle , 1993 .

[21]  G. Huiskamp,et al.  The need for correct realistic geometry in the inverse EEG problem , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Medical image analysis: Foreword , 1999, Medical Image Anal..

[23]  Daniël De Zutter,et al.  Accurate and Conforming Mixed Discretization of the MFIE , 2011, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[24]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Head model and electrical source imaging: A study of 38 epileptic patients☆ , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[25]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Symmetric BEM Formulation for the M/EEG Forward Problem , 2003, IPMI.

[26]  Mark Holden,et al.  Physics in Medicine and Biology , 1956, Nature.

[27]  Hannah C. Glass,et al.  Neonatal seizures , 2009, Current treatment options in neurology.

[28]  Snorre H. Christiansen,et al.  A dual finite element complex on the barycentric refinement , 2005, Math. Comput..

[29]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[30]  Harald Köstler,et al.  Numerical Mathematics of the Subtraction Method for the Modeling of a Current Dipole in EEG Source Reconstruction Using Finite Element Head Models , 2007, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[31]  F. Zanow,et al.  Individually shaped volume conductor models of the head in EEG source localisation , 1995, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[32]  Satu Tissari,et al.  Iterative solution of dense linear systems arising from the electrostatic integral equation in MEG. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  R. Pascual-Marqui Review of methods for solving the EEG inverse problem , 1999 .

[34]  O. Scherzer Handbook of mathematical methods in imaging , 2011 .

[35]  João Jorge,et al.  Towards high-quality simultaneous EEG-fMRI at 7T: Detection and reduction of EEG artifacts due to head motion , 2015, NeuroImage.

[36]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Medicine and Biology , 2005 .

[37]  M. Clerc,et al.  In vivo Conductivity Estimation with Symmetric Boundary Elements , 2005 .

[38]  Ewout Vansteenkiste,et al.  A realistic volume conductor model of the neonatal head: Methods, challenges and applications , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[39]  Onno W. Weier,et al.  On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method (EEG application) , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  Dang Khoa Nguyen,et al.  Using patient-specific hemodynamic response function in epileptic spike analysis of human epilepsy: a study based on EEG–fNIRS , 2016, NeuroImage.

[41]  Andreas Schulze-Bonhage,et al.  The role of blood vessels in high-resolution volume conductor head modeling of EEG , 2015, NeuroImage.

[42]  M. Roth,et al.  Single‐trial analysis of oddball event‐related potentials in simultaneous EEG‐fMRI , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[43]  C. Schwab,et al.  Boundary Element Methods , 2010 .

[44]  Thom F. Oostendorp,et al.  The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  Bart Vanrumste,et al.  Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[46]  Z. Zhang,et al.  A fast method to compute surface potentials generated by dipoles within multilayer anisotropic spheres. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  Olaf Steinbach,et al.  The construction of some efficient preconditioners in the boundary element method , 1998, Adv. Comput. Math..

[48]  J. D. Munck,et al.  A fast method to compute the potential in the multisphere model (EEG application) , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  G. Holmes,et al.  Neonatal seizures: characteristics of EEG ictal activity in preterm and fullterm infants , 2003, Brain and Development.

[50]  Francesco P. Andriulli,et al.  Mixed discretization formulations for the direct EEG problem , 2014, The 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2014).

[51]  Roberto D. Graglia,et al.  Static and dynamic potential integrals for linearly varying source distributions in two- and three-dimensional problems , 1987 .

[52]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Mathematical dipoles are adequate to describe realistic generators of human brain activity , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[53]  M. Hämäläinen,et al.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[54]  Francesco P. Andriulli,et al.  Improving the MFIE's accuracy by using a mixed discretization , 2009, 2009 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium.

[55]  Bart Vanrumste,et al.  Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation Open Access Review on Solving the Inverse Problem in Eeg Source Analysis , 2022 .

[56]  N. G. Gencer,et al.  Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[57]  Jean-Michel Badier,et al.  Source localization of ictal epileptic activity investigated by high resolution EEG and validated by SEEG , 2010, NeuroImage.

[58]  G. W. Pruis,et al.  A comparison of different numerical methods for solving the forward problem in EEG and MEG. , 1993, Physiological measurement.

[59]  W. Hackbusch Integral Equations: Theory and Numerical Treatment , 1995 .

[60]  Yu Huang,et al.  The New York Head—A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting , 2015, NeuroImage.

[61]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Systematic Regularization of Linear Inverse Solutions of the EEG Source Localization Problem , 2002, NeuroImage.

[62]  S. Makeig,et al.  Effects of Forward Model Errors on EEG Source Localization , 2013, Brain Topography.

[63]  Toshimitsu Musha,et al.  Electric Dipole Tracing in the Brain by Means of the Boundary Element Method and Its Accuracy , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[64]  M. Fuchs,et al.  Boundary element method volume conductor models for EEG source reconstruction , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[65]  T. Chan Deflated Decomposition of Solutions of Nearly Singular Systems , 1984 .

[66]  Fabrice Wendling,et al.  The neuronal sources of EEG: Modeling of simultaneous scalp and intracerebral recordings in epilepsy , 2008, NeuroImage.

[67]  J. Sarvas,et al.  Bioelectromagnetic forward problem: isolated source approach revis(it)ed , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[68]  Joerg F. Hipp,et al.  Measuring the cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity with EEG and MEG , 2016, NeuroImage.

[69]  Jens Haueisen,et al.  Dipole models for the EEG and MEG , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[70]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  A common formalism for the Integral formulations of the forward EEG problem , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[71]  Mostefa Mesbah,et al.  EEG amplitude and correlation spatial decay analysis for neonatal head modelling , 2012, 2012 11th International Conference on Information Science, Signal Processing and their Applications (ISSPA).

[72]  Jianming Jin,et al.  Improving the Accuracy of the Second-Kind Fredholm Integral Equations by Using the Buffa-Christiansen Functions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[73]  L. Tartar An Introduction to Sobolev Spaces and Interpolation Spaces , 2007 .

[74]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data , 2014, NeuroImage.

[75]  Scott Makeig,et al.  Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation , 2016, NeuroImage.

[76]  Olaf Steinbach,et al.  Numerical Approximation Methods for Elliptic Boundary Value Problems: Finite and Boundary Elements , 2007 .

[77]  Mostefa Mesbah,et al.  Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models , 2014, NeuroImage.

[78]  Nikos Makris,et al.  Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[79]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.