A methodological framework to distinguish spectrum effects from spectrum biases and to assess diagnostic and screening test accuracy for patient populations: Application to the Papanicolaou cervical cancer smear test

[1]  S. Cantor,et al.  Ethnic and Sex Bias in Primary Care Screening Tests for Alcohol Use Disorders , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  A New Logistic Regression Approach for the Evaluation of Diagnostic Test Results , 2005, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[3]  Stephanie A. Mulherin,et al.  Spectrum Bias or Spectrum Effect? Subgroup Variation in Diagnostic Test Evaluation , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  D. Rennie,et al.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  C. Pichard,et al.  Body mass index compared to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: evidence for a spectrum bias. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  S. Assmann,et al.  Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials , 2000, The Lancet.

[7]  G. Wilbanks,et al.  An international terminology of colposcopy: report of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Federation of Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  S. Lange,et al.  Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence by H. Brenner and O. Gefeller, Statistics in Medicine, 16, 981-991 (1997) , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  R. Newcombe.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  J D Habbema,et al.  Redundancy of single diagnostic test evaluation. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[11]  L. Pickle,et al.  The logistic modeling of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a diagnostic test. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good. , 1995, JAMA.

[13]  J. Seward,et al.  Sex and test verification bias. Impact on the diagnostic value of exercise echocardiography. , 1997, Circulation.

[14]  R. Gonzales,et al.  The relationship between the clinical features of pharyngitis and the sensitivity of a rapid antigen test: evidence of spectrum bias. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[15]  David Moher,et al.  The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[16]  J. Soler‐Soler,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of technetium-99m-MIBI myocardial SPECT in women and men. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  G. Samsa,et al.  Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  A. Verbeek,et al.  Problems in selecting the adequate patient population from existing data files for assessment studies of new diagnostic tests. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  H C van Houwelingen,et al.  The (in)validity of sensitivity and specificity. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  J. Coste,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness of monolayers and human papillomavirus testing compared to that of conventional Papanicolaou smears for cervical cancer screening: Protocol of the study of the French Society of Clinical Cytology , 2001, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[21]  E. Belongia,et al.  Spectrum bias of a rapid antigen detection test for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis in a pediatric population. , 2004, Pediatrics.

[22]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[23]  Philippe Vielh,et al.  Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  R. Filly,et al.  Sonographic evaluation of liver nodularity: Inspection of deep versus superficial surfaces of the liver , 2002, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[25]  S. Pocock,et al.  Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practiceand problems , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  徐晶（译）.  基因科学与亲子鉴定——国际流行病与公众健康杂志J Epidemiol Community Health , 2005 .

[27]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  F. Harrell,et al.  Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. , 1984, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  Susan A. Murphy,et al.  Monographs on statistics and applied probability , 1990 .

[30]  D. Cipriani,et al.  Comparing Rasch analyses probability estimates to sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios when examining the utility of medical diagnostic tests. , 2005, Journal of applied measurement.

[31]  M. Ziol,et al.  Efficiency of the Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA Test in Cervical Cancer Screening , 2003 .

[32]  D. Grobbee,et al.  Diagnostic studies as multivariable, prediction research , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[33]  F. X. Bosch,et al.  Chapter 1: Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer--burden and assessment of causality. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[34]  H Brenner,et al.  Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  D S Berman,et al.  A model for assessing the sensitivity and specificity of tests subject to selection bias. Application to exercise radionuclide ventriculography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.

[36]  Sara T Brookes,et al.  Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[37]  M. Ziol,et al.  Efficiency of the hybrid capture 2 HPV DNA test in cervical cancer screening. A study by the French Society of Clinical Cytology. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[38]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[39]  A. Morabia,et al.  Spectrum bias: a quantitative and graphical analysis of the variability of medical diagnostic test performance , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[40]  Diane Solomon,et al.  The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: revised after the second National Cancer Institute Workshop, April 29-30, 1991. , 1993, Acta cytologica.

[41]  F. Harrell,et al.  Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors , 2005 .

[42]  M. Schiffman,et al.  Chapter 2: Natural history of anogenital human papillomavirus infection and neoplasia. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[43]  F. Harrell,et al.  Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography. Multivariable analysis. , 1984, The American journal of medicine.

[44]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Spectrum Bias in the Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests: Lessons from the Rapid Dipstick Test for Urinary Tract Infection , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[45]  G. Diamond,et al.  Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography in biased and unbiased populations of men and women. , 1995, American heart journal.

[46]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Use of progressive glaucomatous optic disk change as the reference standard for evaluation of diagnostic tests in glaucoma. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[47]  F. Harrell,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity should be de-emphasized in diagnostic accuracy studies. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[48]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[49]  Diederick E. Grobbee,et al.  Limitations of Sensitivity, Specificity, Likelihood Ratio, and Bayes' Theorem in Assessing Diagnostic Probabilities: A Clinical Example , 1997, Epidemiology.

[50]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Context bias. A problem in diagnostic radiology. , 1996, JAMA.

[51]  A. Detsky,et al.  The effect of spectrum bias on the utility of magnetic resonance imaging and evoked potentials in the diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis , 1996, Neurology.

[52]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Foundations of medical diagnosis: what actually are the parameters involved in Bayes' theorem? , 1994, Statistics in medicine.