The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE)

PurposeLife cycle assessment (LCA) has been used to assess freshwater-related impacts according to a new water footprint framework formalized in the ISO 14046 standard. To date, no consensus-based approach exists for applying this standard and results are not always comparable when different scarcity or stress indicators are used for characterization of impacts. This paper presents the outcome of a 2-year consensus building process by the Water Use in Life Cycle Assessment (WULCA), a working group of the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, on a water scarcity midpoint method for use in LCA and for water scarcity footprint assessments.MethodsIn the previous work, the question to be answered was identified and different expert workshops around the world led to three different proposals. After eliminating one proposal showing low relevance for the question to be answered, the remaining two were evaluated against four criteria: stakeholder acceptance, robustness with closed basins, main normative choice, and physical meaning.Results and discussionThe recommended method, AWARE, is based on the quantification of the relative available water remaining per area once the demand of humans and aquatic ecosystems has been met, answering the question “What is the potential to deprive another user (human or ecosystem) when consuming water in this area?” The resulting characterization factor (CF) ranges between 0.1 and 100 and can be used to calculate water scarcity footprints as defined in the ISO standard.ConclusionsAfter 8 years of development on water use impact assessment methods, and 2 years of consensus building, this method represents the state of the art of the current knowledge on how to assess potential impacts from water use in LCA, assessing both human and ecosystem users’ potential deprivation, at the midpoint level, and provides a consensus-based methodology for the calculation of a water scarcity footprint as per ISO 14046.

[1]  C. Müller,et al.  Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance , 2007 .

[2]  Naota Hanasaki,et al.  Water Scarcity Footprints by Considering the Differences in Water Sources , 2015 .

[3]  Markus Berger,et al.  Water accounting and vulnerability evaluation (WAVE): considering atmospheric evaporation recycling and the risk of freshwater depletion in water footprinting. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Rana Pant,et al.  Reply to the editorial “Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment?” written by Prof. Finkbeiner (Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):266–271) , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Aranya Venkatesh,et al.  Large-scale hydrological modeling for calculating water stress indices: implications of improved spatiotemporal resolution, surface-groundwater differentiation, and uncertainty characterization. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  G. Sonnemann,et al.  The UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative , 2014 .

[7]  P. Döll,et al.  Sensitivity of simulated global-scale freshwater fluxes and storages to input data, hydrological model structure, human water use and calibration , 2014 .

[8]  J. Alcamo,et al.  Global modeling and scenario analysis for the World Commission on Water for the 21st Century , 2017 .

[9]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment , 2014, Science.

[10]  Véronique Bellon-Maurel,et al.  Assessing water deprivation at the sub-river basin scale in LCA integrating downstream cascade effects. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  A. Boulay,et al.  Regional characterization of freshwater Use in LCA: modeling direct impacts on human health. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  Swiss Ecological Scarcity Method: The New Version 2006 , 2006 .

[13]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: findings of the scoping phase , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  A. Boulay,et al.  LCA Characterisation of Freshwater Use on Human Health and Through Compensation , 2011 .

[15]  A. Hoekstra.  A critique on the water-scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA , 2016 .

[16]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative , 2004 .

[17]  S. Pfister,et al.  Ecoinvent 3: assessing water use in LCA and facilitating water footprinting , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  Manuele Margni,et al.  A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA , 2010 .

[19]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Global Monthly Water Scarcity: Blue Water Footprints versus Blue Water Availability , 2012, PloS one.

[20]  C. Vörösmarty,et al.  Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. , 2000, Science.

[21]  Stephan Pfister,et al.  Spatial and temporal specific characterisation factors for water use impact assessment in Spain , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[22]  Dominik Saner,et al.  Effects of Consumptive Water Use on Biodiversity in Wetlands of International Importance , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[25]  Manuele Margni,et al.  Categorizing water for LCA inventory , 2011 .

[26]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[27]  P. Döll,et al.  Development and testing of the WaterGAP 2 global model of water use and availability , 2003 .

[28]  S. Pfister,et al.  Analysis of water use impact assessment methods (part A): evaluation of modeling choices based on a quantitative comparison of scarcity and human health indicators , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[29]  A. Inaba,et al.  Consensus building on the development of a stress-based indicator for LCA-based impact assessment of water consumption: outcome of the expert workshops , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[30]  F. Gassert,et al.  Aqueduct Global Maps 2.1 , 2013 .

[31]  Mark A J Huijbregts,et al.  Implementing groundwater extraction in life cycle impact assessment: characterization factors based on plant species richness for The Netherlands. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Berger Markus,et al.  Building consensus on a generic water scarcity indicator for LCA-based water footprint: preliminary results from WULCA , 2014 .

[33]  Stephan Pfister,et al.  Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[34]  Markus Berger,et al.  Methodological Challenges in Volumetric and Impact‐Oriented Water Footprints , 2013 .

[35]  Martina Flörke,et al.  Domestic and industrial water uses of the past 60 years as a mirror of socio-economic development: A global simulation study , 2013 .

[36]  Tim Hess,et al.  Understanding the LCA and ISO water footprint: A response to Hoekstra (2016) "A critique on the water-scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA". , 2017, Ecological indicators.

[37]  Pavel Kabat,et al.  Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments , 2013 .

[38]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Review and classification of indicators of green water availability and scarcity , 2015 .

[39]  Petra Döll,et al.  A Pilot Global Assessment of Environmental Water Requirements and Scarcity , 2004 .

[40]  Brian Richter,et al.  A PRESUMPTIVE STANDARD FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW PROTECTION , 2012 .