What factors influence auditors' use of computer-assisted audit techniques? ☆ ☆☆

To meet the challenges of rapid advances in client technology, audit standards urge auditors to use computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATs). However, recent research suggests that CAAT use is fairly low. This paper uses the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to identify and then examines factors potentially influencing auditors' use or non-use of CAATs. Examining auditor use of CAATs is important because CAATs hold out the promise of improving audit efficiency and effectiveness. Data was obtained from 181 auditors from Big 4, national, regional, and local firms. Results indicate that outcome expectations, the extent of organizational pressures and technical infrastructure support influence the likelihood that auditors will use CAATs.

[1]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[2]  D. R. Carmichael,et al.  The PCAOB and the Social Responsibility of the Independent Auditor , 2004 .

[3]  David C. Yen,et al.  Auditing in the e-commerce era , 2004, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[4]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[5]  Alastair Lawrence,et al.  Can Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 Differences in Audit-Quality Proxies Be Attributed to Client Characteristics? , 2011 .

[6]  Diane J. Janvrin,et al.  An Investigation of Factors Influencing the Use of Computer‐Related Audit Procedures , 2009, J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[8]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing , 1995 .

[9]  Michael Sherer,et al.  Audit automation as control within audit firms , 2001 .

[10]  Mohan Tanniru,et al.  Conceptualizing Structurable Tasks in the Development of Knowledge‐Based Systems* , 1996 .

[11]  M. J. Fischer,et al.  "Real-izing" the benefits of new technologies as a source of audit evidence: An interpretive field study , 1996 .

[12]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[13]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE , 2000 .

[14]  Amr Kotb,et al.  The Impact of E‐Business on the Audit Process: An Investigation of the Factors Leading to Change , 2011 .

[15]  Roger Debreceny,et al.  Employing generalized audit software in the financial services sector: Challenges and opportunities , 2005 .

[16]  Nancy A. Bagranoff,et al.  THE EVOLVING ROLE OF IS AUDIT: A FIELD STUDY COMPARING THE PERCEPTIONS OF IS AND FINANCIAL AUDITORS , 2003 .

[17]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[18]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[20]  Carlin Dowling,et al.  Appropriate Audit Support System Use: The Influence of Auditor, Audit Team and Firm Factors , 2008 .

[21]  Junaid M. Shaikh.  E‐commerce impact: emerging technology – electronic auditing , 2005 .

[22]  Tina M. Loraas,et al.  Learning new uses of technology while on an audit engagement: Contextualizing general models to advance pragmatic understanding , 2010, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Robin R. Pennington,et al.  The Effects of Qualitative Overload on Technology Acceptance , 2006, J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Investigating the Support Role of the Information Center , 1990, MIS Q..

[25]  Mary B. Curtis,et al.  An examination of contextual factors and individual characteristics affecting technology implementation decisions in auditing , 2008, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Stewart A. Leech,et al.  Audit Support Systems and Decision Aids: Current Practice and Opportunities for Future Research , 2007 .

[27]  Willie E. Gist,et al.  An Exploratory Study of the Influence of Client Factors on Audit Time Budget Variances , 1999 .

[28]  Zoe-Vonna Palmrose.  AUDIT FEES AND AUDITOR SIZE - FURTHER EVIDENCE , 1986 .

[29]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[30]  Nurmazilah Mahzan,et al.  Adoption of Computer Assisted Audit Tools and Techniques (CAATTs) by Internal Auditors: Current issues in the UK , 2008 .

[31]  C. J. Wolfe,et al.  Why Wait? Modeling Factors that Influence the Decision of When to Learn a New Use of Technology , 2006, J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[33]  Robert L. Braun,et al.  Computer‐assisted audit tools and techniques: analysis and perspectives , 2003 .

[34]  Jean C. Bedard,et al.  The effect of training on auditors' acceptance of an electronic work system , 2003, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[37]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  Evidence from Auditors About Managers' and Auditors' Earnings-Management Decisions , 2001 .

[38]  Marilyn M. Greenstein,et al.  Assurance practitioners' and educators' self-perceived IT knowledge level: an empirical assessment , 2004, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Simon D. Kent,et al.  The utilisation of generalized audit software (GAS) by external auditors , 2012 .

[40]  Soushan Wu,et al.  Electronically auditing EDP systems: With the support of emerging information technologies , 2001, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[42]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[43]  Joseph F. Brazel,et al.  Auditors' Use of Brainstorming in the Consideration of Fraud: Evidence from the Field , 2009 .

[44]  Michael Gibbins,et al.  Evidence About Auditor-Client Management Negotiation Concerning Client's Financial Reporting , 2000 .