Stratospheric water vapour and high climate sensitivity in a version of the HadSM3 climate model

Abstract. It has been shown previously that one member of the Met Office Hadley Centre single-parameter perturbed physics ensemble – the so-called "low entrainment parameter" member – has a much higher climate sensitivity than other individual parameter perturbations. Here we show that the concentration of stratospheric water vapour in this member is over three times higher than observations, and, more importantly for climate sensitivity, increases significantly when climate warms. The large surface temperature response of this ensemble member is more consistent with stratospheric humidity change, rather than upper tropospheric clouds as has been previously suggested. The direct relationship between the bias in the control state (elevated stratospheric humidity) and the cause of the high climate sensitivity (a further increase in stratospheric humidity) lends further doubt as to the realism of this particular integration. This, together with other evidence, lowers the likelihood that the climate system's physical sensitivity is significantly higher than the likely upper range quoted in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fourth Assessment Report.

[1]  M. Webb,et al.  Climate model errors, feedbacks and forcings: a comparison of perturbed physics and multi-model ensembles , 2011 .

[2]  S. Solomon,et al.  Contributions of Stratospheric Water Vapor to Decadal Changes in the Rate of Global Warming , 2010, Science.

[3]  Jonathan Rougier,et al.  Analyzing the Climate Sensitivity of the HadSM3 Climate Model Using Ensembles from Different but Related Experiments , 2009 .

[4]  D. Stone,et al.  Towards constraining climate sensitivity by linear analysis of feedback patterns in thousands of perturbed-physics GCM simulations , 2008 .

[5]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[6]  Holger Vömel,et al.  Decreases in stratospheric water vapor after 2001: Links to changes in the tropical tropopause and the Brewer‐Dobson circulation , 2006 .

[7]  I. Musat,et al.  On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles , 2006 .

[8]  S. Fueglistaler,et al.  Control of interannual and longer‐term variability of stratospheric water vapor , 2005 .

[9]  Leonard A. Smith,et al.  Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases , 2005, Nature.

[10]  S. Sherwood,et al.  Effect of convection on the summertime extratropical lower stratosphere , 2004 .

[11]  M. Webb,et al.  Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations , 2004, Nature.

[12]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[13]  Manoj Joshi,et al.  A GCM Study of Volcanic Eruptions as a Cause of Increased Stratospheric Water Vapor , 2003 .

[14]  Adam A. Scaife,et al.  Can changes in ENSO activity help to explain increasing stratospheric water vapor? , 2003 .

[15]  S. Raper,et al.  An Observationally Based Estimate of the Climate Sensitivity , 2002 .

[16]  P. Forster,et al.  Assessing the climate impact of trends in stratospheric water vapor , 2002 .

[17]  M. McCormick,et al.  Stratospheric water vapor increases over the past half‐century , 2001 .

[18]  S. Solomon.  The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[19]  Tim N. Palmer,et al.  Using numerical weather prediction to assess climate models , 2007 .

[20]  Masson-Delmotte,et al.  The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[21]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .