Bootstrapping agency: How control-relevant information affects motivation.

How does information about one's control over the environment (e.g., having an own-action effect) influence motivation? The control-based response selection framework was proposed to predict and explain such findings. Its key tenant is that control relevant information modulates both the frequency and speed of responses by determining whether a perceptual event is an outcome of one's actions or not. To test this framework empirically, the current study examines whether and how temporal and spatial contiguity/predictability-previously established as being important for one's sense of agency-modulate motivation from control. In 5 experiments, participants responded to a cue, potentially triggering a perceptual effect. Temporal (Experiments 1a-c) and spatial (Experiments 2a and b) contiguity/predictability between actions and their potential effects were experimentally manipulated. The influence of these control-relevant factors was measured, both indirectly (through their effect on explicit judgments of agency) and directly on response time and response frequency. The pattern of results was highly consistent with the control-based response selection framework in suggesting that control relevant information reliably modulates the impact of "having an effect" on different levels of action selection. We discuss the implications of this study for the notion of motivation from control and for the empirical work on the sense of agency. (PsycINFO Database Record

[1]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Prediction Modulates the Perception of Self-Produced Stimuli , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  S. Schütz-Bosbach,et al.  Agency and outcome prediction , 2015 .

[3]  E. J. Capaldi,et al.  A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  E. Higgins,et al.  What's in a goal? The role of motivational relevance in cognition and action. , 2014, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[5]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Sense of control depends on fluency of action selection, not motor performance , 2012, Cognition.

[6]  J N Sanes,et al.  Dopaminergic effects on simple and choice reaction time performance in Parkinson's disease , 1988, Neurology.

[7]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The role of action effects in infants’ action control , 2004, Psychological research.

[8]  B. Sparrow,et al.  Vicarious agency: experiencing control over the movements of others. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  E. Higgins,et al.  Motivation in Mental Accessibility: Relevance Of A Representation (ROAR) as a New Framework. , 2010, Social and personality psychology compass.

[10]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  Believing and Perceiving: Authorship Belief Modulates Sensory Attenuation , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[12]  P. Haggard,et al.  Agency in the sensorimotor system and its relation to explicit action awareness , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  A. Newen,et al.  Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[14]  S. Schütz-Bosbach,et al.  Reliability of sensory predictions determines the experience of self-agency , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[15]  M. Delgado,et al.  Modulation of Caudate Activity by Action Contingency , 2004, Neuron.

[16]  D. Wegner,et al.  Time warp: Authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  P. Haggard.  Conscious intention and motor cognition , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Frontal Cortex and the Discovery of Abstract Action Rules , 2010, Neuron.

[19]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  On the influence of causal beliefs on the feeling of agency , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[20]  V J Brown,et al.  Discriminative Cues Indicating Reward Magnitude Continue to Determine Reaction Time of Rats Following Lesions of the Nucleus Accumbens , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  A. Cravo,et al.  Bias and learning in temporal binding: Intervals between actions and outcomes are compressed by prior bias , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[22]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Why can't you tickle yourself? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[23]  K. Vogeley,et al.  The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[24]  D. Wegner,et al.  When moving without volition: Implied self-causation enhances binding strength between involuntary actions and effects , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[25]  The Sense of Agency , 2015 .

[26]  Y. Yeshurun,et al.  Blinded by irrelevance: pure irrelevance induced "blindness". , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  J. Rotter.  Social learning and clinical psychology , 2017 .

[28]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: the role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Atsushi Sato,et al.  Illusion of sense of self-agency: discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership , 2005, Cognition.

[30]  Simone Schütz-Bosbach,et al.  I Did It: Unconscious Expectation of Sensory Consequences Modulates the Experience of Self-agency and Its Functional Signature , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Forward Modeling Mediates Motor Awareness , 2010 .

[32]  P. Redgrave,et al.  What is reinforced by phasic dopamine signals? , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.

[33]  Z. Diénès.  Understanding Psychology as a Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Statistical Inference , 2008 .

[34]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  P. Redgrave,et al.  The basal ganglia: a vertebrate solution to the selection problem? , 1999, Neuroscience.

[36]  K. Doya,et al.  Representation of Action-Specific Reward Values in the Striatum , 2005, Science.

[37]  B. Hommel,et al.  The role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[38]  D. Wegner,et al.  Apparent mental causation. Sources of the experience of will. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[39]  H. Scheich,et al.  The left dorsal striatum is involved in the processing of neutral feedback , 2008, Neuroreport.

[40]  H. Cooper,et al.  The desirability of control , 1979 .

[41]  W. Wagenaar,et al.  The perception of randomness , 1991 .

[42]  P. Haggard,et al.  Exploring implicit and explicit aspects of sense of agency , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[43]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Effect of Distorted Visual Feedback on the Sense of Agency , 2008, Behavioural neurology.

[44]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Defective recognition of one's own actions in patients with schizophrenia. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[45]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition of agency. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  Daniel M. Wegner,et al.  Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for events , 2008 .

[47]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[48]  G. Cumming,et al.  The New Statistics , 2014, Psychological science.

[49]  A. Graybiel.  Building action repertoires: memory and learning functions of the basal ganglia , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[50]  H. Aarts,et al.  Priming and authorship ascription: when nonconscious goals turn into conscious experiences of self-agency. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Motor Cognition: What Actions Tell the Self , 2006 .

[52]  B. Eitam,et al.  I control therefore I do: Judgments of agency influence action selection , 2015, Cognition.

[53]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  The Cerebellum Contributes to Somatosensory Cortical Activity during Self-Produced Tactile Stimulation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[54]  R. W. White.  Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. , 1959, Psychological review.

[55]  E. Pacherie.  The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework , 2008, Cognition.

[56]  D. Wegner,et al.  On the inference of personal authorship: Enhancing experienced agency by priming effect information , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[57]  N. Cox,et al.  DIRIFIT: Stata module to fit a Dirichlet distribution , 2010 .

[58]  H. Kelley.  Attribution in social interaction. , 1987 .

[59]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  M. Frank.  Computational models of motivated action selection in corticostriatal circuits , 2011, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[61]  B. Hommel,et al.  Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning , 2004, Psychological research.

[62]  B. Eitam,et al.  Motivation from control , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[63]  C. Frith.  Making up the Mind: How the Brain Creates Our Mental World , 2007 .

[64]  C. Frith,et al.  Self-awareness and action , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[65]  Simone Kühn,et al.  Subjective illusion of control modulates striatal reward anticipation in adolescence , 2015, NeuroImage.

[66]  E. Higgins.  Beyond Pleasure and Pain: How Motivation Works , 2011 .

[67]  Atsushi Sato,et al.  Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency , 2009, Cognition.