The Impact of Anonymity on Perceptions of Source Credibility and Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Communication: A Test of Two Competing Hypotheses
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Kashy,et al. Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Data from Dyads and Groups , 2012 .
[2] Victoria K. Clawson,et al. Research-driven facilitation training for computer-supported environments , 1996 .
[3] C. Erik Timmerman,et al. Ironic uses of group communication technology: Evidence from meeting transcripts and interviews with group decision support system users , 1998 .
[4] Bruce A. Reinig,et al. Toward an Understanding of Satisfaction with the Process and Outcomes of Teamwork , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[5] Alan R. Dennis,et al. Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis , 2001, MIS Q..
[6] T. Postmes,et al. Social processes and group decision making: anonymity in group decision support systems , 2000, Ergonomics.
[7] S. Fiske,et al. The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .
[8] H. Kelley,et al. Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change , 1982 .
[9] Bruce A. Reinig,et al. An investigation of the influence of national culture and group support systems on group processes and outcomes , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.
[10] D. A. Kenny,et al. Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .
[11] P. Bentler,et al. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .
[12] Gerardine DeSanctis,et al. Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .
[13] Poppy Lauretta McLeod,et al. A comprehensive model of anonymity in computer-supported group decision making , 1997, ICIS '97.
[14] Larry E. Toothaker,et al. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .
[15] N. Kerr. When is a minority a minority? Active versus passive minority advocacy and social influence , 2002 .
[16] Kwok Kee Wei,et al. An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Group Support Systems (GSS) and Task Type on Group Interactions from an Influence Perspective , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[17] Gerardine DeSanctis,et al. Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .
[18] Peter M. Bentler,et al. EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .
[19] Blair T. Johnson. Insights about Attitudes: Meta-Analytic Perspectives , 1991 .
[20] F. Boster,et al. The impact of varying argument quality and minority size on influencing the majority and perceptions of the minority , 2001 .
[21] Dennis S. Gouran,et al. Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision‐making discussions , 1978 .
[22] J. Mccroskey. Scales for the measurement of ethos , 1966 .
[23] Alan R. Dennis,et al. Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[24] M. Hardy. Regression with dummy variables , 1993 .
[25] C. D. De Dreu,et al. Minority Influence on Focal and Related Attitudes: Change in Size, Attributions, and Information Processing , 2002 .
[26] Alan R. Dennis,et al. Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think , 1996, MIS Q..
[27] Paul A. Mongeau,et al. Majority/minority size and the evaluations of persuasive arguments , 1992 .
[28] Charles R. Schwenk,et al. Devil's Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry Effects on Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1995 .
[29] Alain Pinsonneault,et al. Anonymity in Group Support Systems Research: A New Conceptualization, Measure, and Contingency Framework , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[30] Jay F. Nunamaker,et al. Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[31] Lorne Campbell,et al. Estimating Actor, Partner, and Interaction Effects for Dyadic Data Using PROC MIXED and HLM: A User–Friendly Guide , 2002 .
[32] Alan R. Dennis,et al. A conceptual framework of anonymity in Group Support Systems , 1992 .
[33] S. Kiesler,et al. Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .
[34] J. Valacich,et al. Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .
[35] J. Bonito. The Analysis of Participation in Small Groups , 2002 .
[36] Ronald E. Rice,et al. Identification of Comment Authorship in Anonymous Group Support Systems , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[37] Richard E. Yellen,et al. Extraversion and introversion in electronically-supported meetings , 1995, Inf. Manag..
[38] J. Mccroskey,et al. Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement , 1999 .
[39] K. Wei,et al. An Empirical Study of the Task Dimension of Group Support System , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..
[40] Andrew J. Flanagin,et al. Computer-Mediated Group Work: The Interaction of Sex and Anonymity , 2002, Commun. Res..
[41] D. A. Kenny,et al. The statistical analysis of data from small groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[42] Paul A. Mongeau,et al. Argument quality and group member status as determinants of attitudinal minority influence , 1993 .
[43] C. Scott. The impact of physical and discursive anonymity on group members’ multiple identifications during computer‐supported decision making , 1999 .
[44] E.,et al. GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .
[45] B. Tabachnick,et al. Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .
[46] F. Heider. The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .
[47] J. Valacich,et al. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .
[48] Sara B. Kiesler,et al. The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[49] J. Glenn. Ethics in Decision Making , 1986 .
[50] Jay F. Nunamaker,et al. A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..
[51] Dennis S. Gouran,et al. The handbook of group communication theory & research , 1999 .
[52] Douglas R. Vogel,et al. A cross-cultural comparison of GSS and non-GSS consensus and satisfaction levels within and between the U.S. and Mexico , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[53] Ronald E. Rice,et al. Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[54] Ajay S. Vinze,et al. Technology, culture and persuasiveness: a study of choice-shifts in group settings , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[55] Gerardine DeSanctis,et al. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .
[56] Jay F. Nunamaker,et al. Meeting analysis: findings from research and practice , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[57] Anne P. Massey,et al. Element Finding: The Impact of a Group Support System on a Crucial Phase of Sense Making , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..
[58] Stephen A. Rains,et al. Leveling the Organizational Playing Field—Virtually , 2005, Commun. Res..
[59] Kwok Kee Wei,et al. Interacting effects of GDSS and leadership , 1994, Decis. Support Syst..
[60] Janet Fulk,et al. Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .