Removal of steroid estrogens in carbonaceous and nitrifying activated sludge processes.

A carbonaceous (heterotrophic) activated sludge process (ASP), nitrifying ASP and a nitrifying/denitrifying ASP have been studied to examine the role of process type in steroid estrogen removal. Biodegradation efficiencies for total steroid estrogens (Sigma(EST)) of 80 and 91% were recorded for the nitrifying/denitrifying ASP and nitrifying ASP respectively. Total estrogen biodegradation (Sigma(EST)) was only 51% at the carbonaceous ASP, however, the extent of biodegradation in the absence of nitrification clearly indicates the important role of heterotrophs in steroid estrogen removal. The low removal efficiency did not correlate with biomass activity for which the ASP(carbonaceous) recorded 80 microg kg(-1) biomass d(-1) compared to 61 and 15 microg kg(-1) biomass d(-1) at the ASP(nitrifying) and ASP(nitrifying/denitrifying) respectively. This finding was explained by a moderate correlation (r(2)=0.55) between total estrogen loading (Sigma(EST) mgm(-3)d(-1)) and biomass activity (microg Sigma(EST) degraded kg(-1) d(-1)) and has established the impact of loading on steroid estrogen removal at full-scale. At higher solids retention time (SRT), steroid estrogen biodegradation of>80% was observed, as has previously been reported. It is postulated that hydraulic retention time (HRT) is as important as SRT as this governs both reaction time and loading. This observation is based on the high specific estrogen activity determined at the ASP(carbonaceous) plant, the significance of estrogen loading and the positive linear correlation between SRT and HRT.

[1]  G. Sayler,et al.  Mineralization of Steroidal Hormones by Biosolids in Wastewater Treatment Systems in Tennessee U.S.A. , 2000 .

[2]  Adriano Joss,et al.  Removal of estrogens in municipal wastewater treatment under aerobic and anaerobic conditions: consequences for plant optimization. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Bent Halling-Sørensen,et al.  Fate of estrogens in a municipal sewage treatment plant. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  T. Chiu,et al.  TREATMENT AND REMOVAL STRATEGIES OF NATURAL ESTROGENS IN THE WASTEWATER , 2008 .

[5]  J. Lester,et al.  Simultaneous determination of natural and synthetic steroid estrogens and their conjugates in aqueous matrices by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry , 2005 .

[6]  Olwenn V. Martin,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis for environmental diagnosis. A potential application to endocrine disruptor screening: in vitro estrogenicity bioassays. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  John P. Sumpter,et al.  Widespread Sexual Disruption in Wild Fish , 1998 .

[8]  A. Svenson,et al.  Removal of estrogenicity in Swedish municipal sewage treatment plants. , 2003, Water research.

[9]  Marta Carballa,et al.  Calculation methods to perform mass balances of micropollutants in sewage treatment plants. application to pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs). , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Oliver A.H. Jones,et al.  Questioning the excessive use of advanced treatment to remove organic micropollutants from wastewater. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  H. Kroiss,et al.  The solids retention time-a suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants. , 2005, Water research.

[12]  Marta Carballa,et al.  Behavior of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and hormones in a sewage treatment plant. , 2004, Water research.

[13]  D. Connell,et al.  DEGRADATION RATE CONSTANTS OF STEROIDS IN SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS AND RECEIVING WATER , 2008, Environmental technology.

[14]  J. Lester,et al.  Prediction of the bioaccumulation factors and body burden of natural and synthetic estrogens in aquatic organisms in the river systems. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Oliver A.H. Jones,et al.  Pharmaceuticals: a threat to drinking water? , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[16]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[17]  J. Lester,et al.  Determination of endocrine disrupters in sewage treatment and receiving waters , 2003 .

[18]  Edwin J. Routledge,et al.  Identification of Estrogenic Chemicals in STW Effluent. 1. Chemical Fractionation and in Vitro Biological Screening , 1998 .

[19]  J N Lester,et al.  The Effects of Natural and Synthetic Steroid Estrogens in Relation to their Environmental Occurrence , 2002, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[20]  Adriano Joss,et al.  Scrutinizing pharmaceuticals and personal care products in wastewater treatment. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  J. Lester,et al.  Fate of conjugated natural and synthetic steroid estrogens in crude sewage and activated sludge batch studies. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  H Kroiss,et al.  Relevance of the sludge retention time (SRT) as design criteria for wastewater treatment plants for the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals from wastewater. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[23]  A. Boobis,et al.  TREATMENT AND REMOVAL STRATEGIES FOR ESTROGENS FROM WASTEWATER , 2008, Environmental technology.

[24]  A. Boobis,et al.  Determination of steroid estrogens in wastewater by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[25]  Olwenn V. Martin,et al.  Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and the estrogen hypothesis: a quantitative meta-analysis. , 2008, Ciencia & saude coletiva.

[26]  I. Singleton,et al.  Bioremediation; a critical review , 2003 .

[27]  H. Takigami,et al.  Estrogen and estrogen mimics contamination in water and the role of sewage treatment , 2000 .

[28]  Roberta Curini,et al.  Monitoring Natural and Synthetic Estrogens at Activated Sludge Sewage Treatment Plants and in a Receiving River Water , 2000 .

[29]  Edwin J. Routledge,et al.  Identification of Estrogenic Chemicals in STW Effluent. 2. In Vivo Responses in Trout and Roach , 1998 .

[30]  J. Sumpter,et al.  Removal of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in activated sludge treatment works. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  D. Stahl,et al.  Molecular and modeling analyses of the structure and function of nitrifying activated sludge , 1999 .

[32]  A. D. Vethaak,et al.  Analysis and occurrence of estrogenic hormones and their glucuronides in surface water and waste water in The Netherlands. , 1999, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  D. G. Allen,et al.  Surface properties of sludge and their role in bioflocculation and settleability. , 2001, Water research.

[34]  J. Lester,et al.  Fate and Behavior of Endocrine Disrupters in Wastewater Treatment Processes , 2002 .

[35]  J. Sumpter,et al.  Estrogenic Effects of Effluents from Sewage Treatment Works , 1994 .

[36]  John P Sumpter,et al.  Changes in estrogenic and androgenic activities at different stages of treatment in wastewater treatment works , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[37]  Elise Cartmell,et al.  Influence of operating parameters on the biodegradation of steroid estrogens and nonylphenolic compounds during biological wastewater treatment processes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  17α-ethinylestradiol Transformation via Abiotic Nitration in the Presence of Ammonia Oxidizing Bacteria , 2008 .

[39]  John P. Sumpter,et al.  Long-Term Temporal Changes in the Estrogenic Composition of Treated Sewage Effluent and Its Biological Effects on Fish , 2000 .

[40]  John N. Lester,et al.  Endocrine disrupters in wastewater and sludge treatment processes , 2002 .

[41]  J. Vader,et al.  Degradation of ethinyl estradiol by nitrifying activated sludge. , 2000, Chemosphere.