A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment

[1]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  Female academic entrepreneurship and commercialisation: reviewing the evidence and identifying the challenges , 2017 .

[2]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  Female academic entrepreneurship: Reviewing the evidence and identifying the challenges , 2017 .

[3]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence , 2016, The Lancet.

[4]  Mathias Wullum Nielsen,et al.  Limits to meritocracy? Gender in academic recruitment and promotion processes , 2016 .

[5]  Giovanni Filardo,et al.  Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994-2014) , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[6]  M. Curno,et al.  A Systematic Review of the Inclusion (or Exclusion) of Women in HIV Research: From Clinical Studies of Antiretrovirals and Vaccines to Cure Strategies , 2016, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[7]  Graham M Lord,et al.  Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in translational research organisations: a rationale and study protocol , 2016, BMJ Open.

[8]  Christoph I. Lee,et al.  Gender Trends in Radiology Authorship: A 35-Year Analysis. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  E. Ferlie,et al.  Knowledge leadership: Mobilizing management research by becoming the knowledge object , 2015 .

[10]  Ian M. Handley,et al.  Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R. Sege,et al.  Sex Differences in Institutional Support for Junior Biomedical Researchers. , 2015, JAMA.

[13]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Altmetric gender bias? - An exploratory study , 2015 .

[14]  Sang Hong Lee,et al.  Implications of simplified linkage equilibrium SNP simulation , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Andrew J Milat,et al.  A narrative review of research impact assessment models and methods , 2015, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[16]  P. Arlotta,et al.  Seven actionable strategies for advancing women in science, engineering, and medicine. , 2015, Cell stem cell.

[17]  Jonathan Adams,et al.  The nature, scale and beneficiaries of research impact , 2015 .

[18]  K. Gray,et al.  Sex and gender matter in health research: addressing health inequities in health research reporting , 2015, International Journal for Equity in Health.

[19]  E. Annandale,et al.  Gender and Healthcare Policy , 2015 .

[20]  I. Bourgeault,et al.  The Palgrave international handbook of healthcare policy and governance , 2015 .

[21]  L. Stanton,et al.  Features of successful bids for funding of applied health research: a cohort study , 2014, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[22]  Joy L. Johnson,et al.  Does a Change in Health Research Funding Policy Related to the Integration of Sex and Gender Have an Impact? , 2014, PloS one.

[23]  Iain Chalmers,et al.  How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set , 2014, The Lancet.

[24]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science , 2013, Nature.

[25]  Rifat Atun,et al.  Differences in research funding for women scientists: a systematic comparison of UK investments in global infectious disease research during 1997–2010 , 2013, BMJ Open.

[26]  E. Barrett-Connor.  Gender differences and disparities in all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality: epidemiological aspects. , 2013, Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism.

[27]  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín,et al.  Patenting and the Gender Gap: Should Women Be Encouraged to Patent More? , 2013, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[28]  J. Eloy,et al.  Gender Differences in Successful NIH Grant Funding in Otolaryngology , 2013, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[29]  J. Eloy,et al.  Gender Disparities in Scholarly Productivity within Academic Otolaryngology Departments , 2013, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[30]  Jonathan Grant,et al.  Making the Grade: Methodologies for Assessing and Evidencing Research Impact , 2013 .

[31]  Jonathan Grant,et al.  Measuring research: A guide to research evaluation frameworks and tools , 2013 .

[32]  Edward Krupat,et al.  Experiencing the Culture of Academic Medicine: Gender Matters, A National Study , 2013, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[33]  Alis Oancea,et al.  Assessing research impact in academic clinical medicine: a study using Research Excellence Framework pilot impact indicators , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[34]  R. Jagsi,et al.  Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. , 2012, JAMA.

[35]  K. Campbell,et al.  Women in academic surgery: the pipeline is busted. , 2012, Journal of surgical education.

[36]  GENDER EQUALITY PROJECT Targets and Quotas for Women in Leadership : A Global Review of Policy , Practice , and Psychological Research , 2012 .

[37]  B. Schrank,et al.  The Gender Gap in High-Impact Psychiatry Journals , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[38]  Alessandro Liberati,et al.  Conceptual frameworks and empirical approaches used to assess the impact of health research: an overview of reviews , 2011, Health research policy and systems.

[39]  Hong Jiang,et al.  Sex Differences in Application, Success, and Funding Rates for NIH Extramural Programs , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[40]  Chris L. S. Coryn,et al.  A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009 , 2011 .

[41]  I. Zucker,et al.  Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[42]  Marieke van den Brink,et al.  Scouting for talent: appointment practices of women professors in academic medicine. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[43]  Julia Lane,et al.  The science of science policy : a handbook , 2011 .

[44]  R. Preissner,et al.  Analysis of sex and gender-specific research reveals a common increase in publications and marked differences between disciplines , 2010, BMC medicine.

[45]  Sandra J. Jones,et al.  Women faculty: an analysis of their experiences in academic medicine and their coping strategies. , 2010, Gender medicine.

[46]  E. Annandale,et al.  The Palgrave handbook of gender and healthcare , 2010 .

[47]  T. Lagro-Janssen.  Sex, Gender and Health: Developments in Medical Research , 2010 .

[48]  Reshma Jagsi,et al.  Sex Differences in Attainment of Independent Funding by Career Development Awardees , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[49]  L. Bornmann,et al.  Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches , 2009 .

[50]  Reena Sidhu,et al.  The gender imbalance in academic medicine: a study of female authorship in the United Kingdom , 2009, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[51]  R. Jagsi,et al.  Under‐representation of women in high‐impact published clinical cancer research , 2009, Cancer.

[52]  G. Steven McMillan,et al.  Gender differences in patenting activity: An examination of the US biotechnology industry , 2009, Scientometrics.

[53]  B. Cortes.  Women’s work: gender equality vs hierarchy in the life sciences , 2008 .

[54]  T. Ley,et al.  The Gender Gap in NIH Grant Applications , 2008, Science.

[55]  L. Puljak,et al.  Gender and Academic Medicine: A Good Pipeline of Women Graduates Is Not Advancing , 2008, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[56]  M. Carnes,et al.  Can the Language of Tenure Criteria Influence Women's Academic Advancement? , 2007, Journal of women's health.

[57]  P. Östlin,et al.  Unequal, unfair, ineffective and inefficient gender inequity in health: why it exists and how we can change it. Final report , 2007 .

[58]  T. Schmader,et al.  A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants , 2007, Sex roles.

[59]  K. Ryan,et al.  Compensation in Academic Medicine: Progress Toward Gender Equity , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[60]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[61]  C. Welzel,et al.  Empowering Women: Four Theories Tested on Four Different Aspects of Gender Equality , 2007 .

[62]  L. Bornmann,et al.  Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[63]  A. Holdcroft.  Gender bias in research: how does it affect evidence based medicine? , 2007, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[64]  I. Klinge.  Bringing gender expertise to biomedical and health-related research. , 2007, Gender medicine.

[65]  Kelsey E. Medeiros,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers : Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[66]  Reshma Jagsi,et al.  The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature--a 35-year perspective. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[67]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Work-Family Balance and Academic Advancement in Medical Schools , 2006, Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry.

[68]  Donald Tomaskovic-Devey.  Women's Work: Gender Equality vs. Hierarchy in the Life Sciences , 2005 .

[69]  M Egger,et al.  The causes and effects of socio-demographic exclusions from clinical trials. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[70]  T. Ley,et al.  The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005: build it, and they will come. , 2005, JAMA.

[71]  M. V. van Engen,et al.  Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[72]  J. Clancy,et al.  Gender in research : gender impact assessment of the specific programmes of the Fifth Framework Programme : an overview , 2001 .

[73]  L. Sullivan,et al.  Women in academic emergency medicine. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[74]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2000 .

[75]  McCracken Dm.  Winning the talent war for women. Sometimes it takes a revolution. , 2000 .

[76]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2000 .

[77]  Liisa Husu,et al.  Gender Discrimination in the Promised Land of Gender Equality , 2000 .

[78]  V. Jackson,et al.  Career advancement of men and women in academic radiology: is the playing field level? , 2000, Academic radiology.

[79]  N. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Increased Female Authorship in Otolaryngology Over the Past Three Decades , 2000, The Laryngoscope.

[80]  D. McCracken.  Winning the talent war for women. Sometimes it takes a revolution. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[81]  A. Oakley.  Gender, Methodology and People's Ways of Knowing: Some Problems with Feminism and the Paradigm Debate in Social Science , 1998 .

[82]  J. Grant,et al.  No evidence of sexism in peer review , 1997, Nature.

[83]  C. Wennerås,et al.  Nepotism and sexism in peer-review , 1997, Nature.

[84]  Jack Nelson,et al.  Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science , 1996 .

[85]  R N Kostoff.  Research impact assessment. Principles and applications to proposed, ongoing, and completed projects. , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[86]  David Wilsford,et al.  Path Dependency, or Why History Makes It Difficult but Not Impossible to Reform Health Care Systems in a Big Way , 1994, Journal of Public Policy.

[87]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The paradox of critical mass for women in science. , 1994, Science.

[88]  M. Rossiter.  The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science , 1993 .

[89]  S. Harding.  Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives , 1993 .

[90]  B Healy,et al.  The Yentl syndrome. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[91]  E. Brody.  Science as Social Knowledge. Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry , 1990 .

[92]  Nancy Wyatt,et al.  The Science Question in Feminism , 1990 .

[93]  Gendered research and innovation : inteGratinG sex and Gender analysis into the research process , 2022 .