An extended risk assessment approach for chemical plants applied to a study related to pipe ruptures

Risk assessments and Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) in particular have been used in the chemical industry for many years to support decision-making on the choice of arrangements and measures associated with chemical processes, transportation and storage of dangerous substances. The assessments have been founded on a risk perspective seeing risk as a function of frequency of events (probability) and associated consequences. In this paper we point to the need for extending this approach to place a stronger emphasis on uncertainties. A recently developed risk framework designed to better reflect such uncertainties is presented and applied to a chemical plant and specifically the analysis of accidental events related to the rupture of pipes. Two different ways of implementing the framework are presented, one based on the introduction of probability models and one without. The differences between the standard approach and the extended approaches are discussed from a theoretical point of view as well as from a practical risk analyst perspective.

[1]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Treatment of Uncertainty in Performance Assessments for Complex Systems , 1994 .

[2]  T. Aven,et al.  EXPRESSING AND COMMUNICATING UNCERTAINTY IN RELATION TO QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS , 2009 .

[3]  J. S. Arendt Using quantitative risk assessment in the chemical process industry , 1990 .

[4]  T. Aven Foundations of risk analysis , 2003 .

[5]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Representation, Propagation, and Decision Issues in Risk Analysis Under Incomplete Probabilistic Information , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the Need for Restricting the Probabilistic Analysis in Risk Assessments to Variability , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[8]  Jeffery D. Lewins,et al.  Basics of the Monte Carlo Method with Application to System Reliability , 2003 .

[9]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries , 1998 .

[10]  C.J.H. van den Bosch,et al.  Methods for the calculation of physical effects – ‘Yellow Book,’ CPR 14E , 1997 .

[11]  Gigliola Spadoni,et al.  The ARIPAR project: analysis of the major accident risks connected with industrial and transportation activities in the Ravenna area , 1995 .

[12]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Possibility theory and statistical reasoning , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[13]  P. Walley Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities , 1990 .

[14]  D. Richards,et al.  Understanding uncertainty , 2012, Evidence-Based Dentistry.

[15]  T. Aven,et al.  On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain , 2009 .

[16]  J.C.A. Cansado,et al.  An extended Bayesian updating approach to support product selection based on performance testing – A drilling jar case , 2009 .

[17]  Giacomo Antonioni,et al.  HazMat transport through Messina town: from risk analysis suggestions for improving territorial safety , 2002 .

[18]  S. Ferson,et al.  Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability , 1996 .

[19]  Frank Pearson Lees,et al.  Loss prevention in the process industries : hazard identification, assessment, and control , 1980 .

[20]  James O. Berger,et al.  An overview of robust Bayesian analysis , 1994 .

[21]  Seth D. Guikema,et al.  Whose uncertainty assessments (probability distributions) does a risk assessment report: the analysts' or the experts'? , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessment , 1996 .

[23]  Vedat Verter,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORT RISK ASSESSMENT , 1995 .

[24]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[25]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[27]  T. Aven Misconceptions of Risk , 2010 .

[28]  Gary R. Van Sciver Quantitative risk analysis in the chemical process industry , 1990 .

[29]  Maria Francesca Milazzo,et al.  The Influence of Risk Prevention Measures on the Frequency of Failure of Piping , 2010 .

[30]  R. Cooke Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science , 1991 .

[31]  C. J. H. Bosch,et al.  Methods for the calculation of physical effects , 1997 .

[32]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Risk modeling, assessment, and management , 1998 .