Evaluating Effects of Cognitive Load, Takeover Request Lead Time, and Traffic Density on Drivers’ Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving

In conditionally automated driving, drivers engaged in non-driving related tasks (NDRTs) have difficulty taking over control of the vehicle when requested. This study aimed to examine the relationships between takeover performance and drivers’ cognitive load, takeover request (TOR) lead time, and traffic density. We conducted a driving simulation experiment with 80 participants, where they experienced 8 takeover events. For each takeover event, drivers’ subjective ratings of takeover readiness, objective measures of takeover timing and quality, and NDRT performance were collected. Results showed that drivers had lower takeover readiness and worse performance when they were in high cognitive load, short TOR lead time, and heavy oncoming traffic density conditions. Interestingly, if drivers had low cognitive load, they paid more attention to driving environments and responded more quickly to takeover requests in high oncoming traffic conditions. The results have implications for the design of in-vehicle alert systems to help improve takeover performance.

[1]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .

[2]  Huiyi Wang,et al.  Fundamental Study of Jerk: Evaluation of Shift Quality and Ride Comfort , 2004 .

[3]  Susanne M. Jaeggi,et al.  Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis , 2008, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[4]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Jerky driving--An indicator of accident proneness? , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Mascha C. van der Voort,et al.  The influence of time-criticality on Situation Awareness when retrieving human control after automated driving , 2013, ITSC.

[6]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? , 2013 .

[7]  The influence of time-criticality on Situation Awareness when retrieving human control after automated driving , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[8]  Omar Bagdadi,et al.  Development of a method for detecting jerks in safety critical events. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Evaluating multimodal driver displays of varying urgency , 2013, AutomotiveUI.

[10]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving , 2014 .

[11]  Michael Weber,et al.  Autonomous driving: investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance , 2015, AutomotiveUI.

[12]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Driver Inattention During Vehicle Automation: How Does Driver Engagement Affect Resumption Of Control? , 2015 .

[13]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Emergency, Automation Off: Unstructured Transition Timing for Distracted Drivers of Automated Vehicles , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[14]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Towards trustworthy automation: User interfaces that convey internal and external awareness , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[15]  Fouad Hadj-Selem,et al.  How different mental workload levels affect the take-over control after automated driving , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[16]  Kathrin Zeeb,et al.  Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Behavioral Measurement of Trust in Automation , 2016 .

[18]  Martin Steinert,et al.  Understanding driver responses to voice alerts of autonomous car operations , 2016 .

[19]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  The influence of age on the take-over of vehicle control in highly automated driving , 2016 .

[20]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Fred Feng,et al.  Can vehicle longitudinal jerk be used to identify aggressive drivers? An examination using naturalistic driving data. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Kathrin Zeeb,et al.  Why is steering not the same as braking? The impact of non-driving related tasks on lateral and longitudinal driver interventions during conditionally automated driving , 2017 .

[23]  Changxu Wu,et al.  The Effects of Lead Time of Take-Over Request and Nondriving Tasks on Taking-Over Control of Automated Vehicles , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[24]  Lisa J. Molnar,et al.  Understanding trust and acceptance of automated vehicles: An exploratory simulator study of transfer of control between automated and manual driving , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[25]  Riender Happee,et al.  Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Nadja Schömig,et al.  Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving , 2018, Hum. Factors.

[27]  Johan Engström,et al.  Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures , 2019, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Hanna Yun,et al.  How do humans respond when automated vehicles request an immediate vehicle control take-over? , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[29]  X. Jessie Yang,et al.  From Manual Driving to Automated Driving: A Review of 10 Years of AutoUI , 2019, AutomotiveUI.

[30]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Rolling Out the Red (and Green) Carpet: Supporting Driver Decision Making in Automation-to-Manual Transitions , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[31]  Dawn M. Tilbury,et al.  Situational Awareness, Drivers Trust in Automated Driving Systems and Secondary Task Performance , 2019, SAE International Journal of Connected and Automated Vehicles.

[32]  Feng Zhou,et al.  Takeover Transition in Autonomous Vehicles: A YouTube Study , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[33]  Examining the Effects of Emotional Valence and Arousal on Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving , 2020, ArXiv.