Event-Based Geostatistical Modeling: Description and Applications

Event-based methods provide unique opportunities to improve the integration of geologic concepts into reservoir models. This may be accomplished over a continuum of rule complexity from very simple geometric models to complicated dynamics. Even the application of simple rules, including few conceptual interactions based on an understanding of stratigraphic relationships and parametric geometries for event scale depositional and erosion features, have been shown to efficiently produce complicated and realistic reservoir heterogeneities. In more complicated applications, initial and boundary conditions from analysis of paleobathymetry and external controls on sediment supply and the event rules may be informed by process models. These models have interesting features that depart from typical geostatistical model; they demonstrate emergent behaviors and preserve all information at all scales during their construction. These models may be utilized to produce very realistic reservoir models and their unique properties allow for novel applications. These modeling applications include; impact of model scale, seismic resolvability, value of information, flow relevance of advanced architecture, iterative and rule-based conditioning to sparse well and seismic data, numerical analogs for architectural concepts, statistical analysis and classification of architectures, unstructured grid construction and utilization as training and visualization tools.

[1]  Henning Omre,et al.  Combining Fibre Processes and Gaussian Random Functions for Modelling Fluvial Reservoirs , 1993 .

[2]  Hongmei Li,et al.  Direct Modeling of Reservoirs through Forward Process-based Models: Can We Get There? , 2008 .

[3]  R. Hauge,et al.  Process Based Stochastic Modelling of Deep Marine Reservoirs , 2007 .

[4]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  FLUVSIM: a program for object-based stochastic modeling of fluvial depositional systems , 2002 .

[5]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  A methodology to construct training images for vein-type deposits , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[6]  C. Deutsch,et al.  Geostatistics Banff 2004 , 2005 .

[7]  Z. Sylvester,et al.  A model of submarine channel-levee evolution based on channel trajectories: Implications for stratigraphic architecture , 2011 .

[8]  Ole J. Martinsen,et al.  Outcrops Revitalized: Tools, Techniques and Applications , 2011 .

[9]  Event-Based Modeling of Turbidite Channel Fill, Channel Stacking Pattern, and Net Sand Volume , 2011 .

[10]  Sebastien Strebelle,et al.  Conditional Simulation of Complex Geological Structures Using Multiple-Point Statistics , 2002 .

[11]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Hierarchical object-based stochastic modeling of fluvial reservoirs , 1996 .

[12]  Numerical Modeling of Deepwater Channel Stacking Pattern from Outcrop and the Quantification of Reservoir Significance , 2011 .

[13]  O. Fouché,et al.  Process-based Reservoir Modelling in the Example of Meandering Channel , 2005 .

[14]  Guirong Liu Mesh Free Methods: Moving Beyond the Finite Element Method , 2002 .

[15]  Amisha Maharaja,et al.  TiGenerator: Object-based training image generator , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[16]  Object-Based Modeling of Fluvial / Deepwater Reservoirs with Fast Data Conditioning: Methodology and Case Studies , 1999 .

[17]  C. Paola,et al.  Complexity in a cellular model of river avulsion , 2007 .

[18]  Timothy A. Cross,et al.  Quantitative Dynamic Stratigraphy , 1990 .

[19]  H. Posamentier,et al.  Architecture of turbidite channel systems on the continental slope: Patterns and predictions , 2011 .

[20]  Kyle M. Straub,et al.  Scale-dependent compensational stacking: An estimate of autogenic time scales in channelized sedimentary deposits , 2011 .

[21]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Stochastic surface-based modeling of turbidite lobes , 2005 .

[22]  J. L. Mallet,et al.  Parameterization of Complex 3D Heterogeneities: A New CAD Approach , 1994 .

[23]  Fluvial channel size determination with indicator variograms , 2010 .