Distributed economic model predictive control for operational safety of nonlinear processes

Achieving operational safety of chemical processes while operating them in an economically-optimal manner is a matter of great importance. Our recent work integrated process safety with process control by incorporating safety-based constraints within model predictive control (MPC) design; however, the safety-based MPC was developed with a centralized architecture, with the result that computation time limitations within a sampling period may reduce the effectiveness of such a controller design for promoting process safety. To address this potential practical limitation of the safety-based control design, in this work, we propose the integration of a distributed model predictive control architecture with Lyapunov-based economic model predictive control (LEMPC) formulated with safety-based constraints. We consider both iterative and sequential distributed control architectures, and the partitioning of inputs between the various optimization problems in the distributed structure based on their impact on process operational safety. Moreover, sufficient conditions that ensure feasibility and closed-loop stability of the iterative and sequential safety distributed LEMPC designs are given. A comparison between the proposed safety distributed EMPC controllers and the safety centralized EMPC is demonstrated via a chemical process example. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 3404–3418, 2017

[1]  Venkat Venkatasubramanian,et al.  Systemic failures: Challenges and opportunities in risk management in complex systems , 2011 .

[2]  Timothy Leif Anderson,et al.  Distributed Economic Model Predictive Control of a Catalytic Reactor: Evaluation of Sequential and Iterative Architectures , 2015 .

[3]  Panagiotis D. Christofides,et al.  Economic model predictive control of nonlinear process systems using Lyapunov techniques , 2012 .

[4]  Xianzhong Chen,et al.  Distributed economic MPC: Application to a nonlinear chemical process network , 2012 .

[5]  Fahad Albalawi,et al.  A feedback control framework for safe and economically‐optimal operation of nonlinear processes , 2016 .

[6]  Riccardo Scattolini,et al.  Architectures for distributed and hierarchical Model Predictive Control - A review , 2009 .

[7]  Panagiotis D. Christofides,et al.  Sequential and Iterative Architectures for Distributed Model Predictive Control of Nonlinear Process Systems , 2010 .

[8]  Faisal Khan,et al.  How to make inherent safety practice a reality , 2008 .

[9]  Panagiotis D. Christofides,et al.  Lyapunov-Based Model Predictive Control of Nonlinear Systems Subject to Data Losses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  Ali Cinar,et al.  A NUMERICAL-METHOD FOR DETERMINING OPTIMAL PARAMETER VALUES IN FORCED PERIODIC OPERATION , 1992 .

[11]  Panagiotis D. Christofides,et al.  Detection, isolation and handling of actuator faults in distributed model predictive control systems , 2010 .

[12]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[13]  M. Mannan,et al.  Development of an Inherent Safety Index Based on Fuzzy Logic , 2003 .

[14]  Panagiotis D. Christofides,et al.  Distributed model predictive control: A tutorial review and future research directions , 2013, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[15]  Markku Hurme,et al.  Safety considerations in process synthesis , 1996 .

[16]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  A system‐theoretic, control‐inspired view and approach to process safety , 2014 .

[17]  J. L. Massera Contributions to Stability Theory , 1956 .

[18]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Distributed MPC Strategies With Application to Power System Automatic Generation Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[19]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , 2006, Math. Program..