Work‐Related Road Safety: An Analysis Based on U.K. Bus Driver Performance

The effects of age and experience on accident involvement for bus drivers were investigated, with special emphasis upon the first years of being an operator, using two methods. First, direct calculations between these variables were undertaken. Thereafter, a variant of the method of quasi-induced exposure (a ratio of culpable versus nonculpable accidents in the population) was used and referred to as the indirect method. These methods yielded fairly similar results, given that the samples used were drawn from the same population but only partly overlapping. It was found that experience had the strongest effect on accidents in the first year of driving, while age had a u-shaped association with accidents, that is, young and old drivers had more accidents, something that was more apparent when experience was held constant. These results show that, for bus drivers, experience is initially more important than age, but after two or three years, the effect is small. Thereafter, age is the more discernible variable, although it is a very weak factor in predicting crash risk.

[1]  A. Golding DIFFERENTIAL ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT: A LITERATURE SURVEY , 1983 .

[2]  K Austin,et al.  The identification of mistakes in road accident records: Part 2, Casualty variables. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  N Stamatiadis,et al.  Quasi-induced exposure: methodology and insight. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  F. E. Vanosdall,et al.  Prediction of police officers' traffic accident involvement using behavioral observations. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  M. Kathleen Sheehan,et al.  Motor Vehicle Crash Involvement and Moving Violations: Convergence of Self-Report and Archival Data , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[6]  P J Ward,et al.  Overtaking road-accidents: differences in manoeuvre as a function of driver age. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  H. M. Johnson,et al.  The detection and treatment of accident-prone drivers. , 1946, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  J. Lester Individual differences in accident liability: a review of the literature , 1991 .

[9]  G Maycock,et al.  ACCIDENT LIABILITY OF CAR DRIVERS: FOLLOW-UP SURVEY , 1995 .

[10]  W. Graziano,et al.  The five-factor model, conscientiousness, and driving accident involvement. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[11]  A J Courtney,et al.  An analysis of accident data for franchised public buses in Hong Kong. , 1985, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Marlos Viana,et al.  SHORT NOTE Relative Effects of Age and Compromised Vision on Driving Performance , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[13]  M. Legge,et al.  Age related changes in drivers' crash risk and crash type. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  D R Mayhew,et al.  NEW TO THE ROAD. YOUNG DRIVERS AND NOVICE DRIVERS: SIMILAR PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS? , 1990 .

[15]  S Harris,et al.  The real number of road traffic accident casualties in The Netherlands: a year-long survey. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Anders af Wåhlberg,et al.  Differential accident involvement of bus drivers , 2005 .

[17]  F. Mcguire Personality Factors in Highway Accidents , 1976, Human factors.

[18]  I. D. Brown,et al.  Exposure and experience are a confounded nuisance in research on driver behaviour. , 1982 .

[19]  D Fife,et al.  Regional variation in motor vehicle accident reporting: findings from Massachusetts. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  G. Underwood,et al.  Forgetting near-accidents: the roles of severity, culpability and experience in the poor recall of dangerous driving situations , 2000 .

[21]  M A Abdel-Aty,et al.  An assessment of the effect of driver age on traffic accident involvement using log-linear models. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  E. I. Signori,et al.  On the Study of Personality Factors in Research on Driving Behavior , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  Daniel R Mayhew,et al.  Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Jeremy Broughton,et al.  WORK-RELATED ROAD ACCIDENTS , 2003 .

[25]  L R Salmi,et al.  Road accident statistics: discrepancies between police and hospital data in a French island. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  A. af Wåhlberg Characteristics of low speed accidents with buses in public transport. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  K Austin,et al.  The identification of mistakes in road accident records: Part 1, Locational variables. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  P Stamatiadis,et al.  Quasi-induced exposure revisited. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Driver health and crash involvement: a case-control study. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  C R Lockwood,et al.  The accident liability of car drivers , 1991 .

[31]  Mark S. Horswill,et al.  Hazard perception and its relevance for driver licensing , 1999 .

[32]  Raymond C. Peck,et al.  The identification of multiple accident correlates in high risk drivers with specific emphasis on the role of age, experience and prior traffic violation frequency , 1993 .

[33]  Lisa Dorn,et al.  Driver Behaviour and Training , 2010 .

[34]  M L Pokorny,et al.  The role of age and experience in bus drivers' accidents. , 1987, International journal of epidemiology.

[35]  C. J. Cornwall,et al.  THE ACCIDENT EXPERIENCE OF LONDON BUS DRIVERS , 1962 .

[36]  af Wåhlberg On the validity of self-reported traffic accident data , 2002 .

[37]  W. Arthur,et al.  Prediction of Vehicular Accident Involvement: A Meta-Analysis , 1991 .

[38]  R. H. V. Zelst,et al.  The effect of age and experience upon accident rate. , 1954 .

[39]  Nikiforos Stamatiadis,et al.  Crash involvement of drivers with multiple crashes. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  C R Lockwood,et al.  THE ACCIDENT LIABILITY OF CAR DRIVERS: THE RELIABILITY OF SELF REPORT DATA , 1996 .

[41]  G McGwin,et al.  Characteristics of traffic crashes among young, middle-aged, and older drivers. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[42]  C. Galasko,et al.  POLICE AND HOSPITAL RECORDING OF NON-FATAL ROAD ACCIDENT CASUALTIES: A STUDY IN GREATER MANCHESTER , 1993 .

[43]  R. Brenner,et al.  Variability of reaction time and susceptibility to automobile accidents. , 1951 .

[44]  A. Smiley,et al.  Time vs. distance as measures of exposure in driving surveys. , 1992, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[45]  J P Szlyk,et al.  Evaluation of driving performance in patients with juvenile macular dystrophies. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[46]  S Rajalin,et al.  The connection between risky driving and involvement in fatal accidents. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[47]  David Crundall,et al.  VISUAL SEARCH WHILE DRIVING: SKILL AND AWARENESS DURING INSPECTION OF THE SCENE , 2002 .

[48]  P A Hancock,et al.  Driver workload during differing driving maneuvers. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[49]  J. P. Bull,et al.  Road accident statistics—A comparison of police and hospital information , 1973 .

[50]  B. Bailly,et al.  Drivers' mental representations: experimental study and training perspectives , 2003 .

[51]  A E af Wåhlberg,et al.  Culpable versus non-culpable traffic accidents; what is wrong with this picture? , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[52]  C. P. Hansen Personality characteristics of the accident involved employee , 1988 .

[53]  D. Beirness THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LIFESTYLE FACTORS AND COLLISIONS INVOLVING YOUNG DRIVERS , 1996 .

[54]  Brian R. Carr,et al.  A statistical analysis of rural ontario traffic accidents using induced exposure data , 1969 .