Efficient and Unbiased Sampling of Nerve Fibers for Estimating Fiber Number and Size

Publisher Summary Nerve fibers may be present in unifascicular or multifascicular peripheral nerve trunks or in central nervous tracts; they may be myelinated or non-myelinated; they may be homogeneous or heterogeneous in size, shape, and spatial distribution within trunks/tracts; they may be viewed by light and/or electron microscopy. This chapter focuses on the efficient and unbiased sampling of cross-sectioned nerve fibers to estimate their number and/or size. Any properly randomized sampling scheme is unbiased, by definition. Efficiency depends on how random selection is performed and on the number of fibers chosen. However, a systematic random scheme is usually preferable to simple random sampling because it does not oversample some areas of nerve trunk/tract at the expense of others. Systematic sampling can be based on strips, squares, or sectors and only about 200 fibers per specimen need to be chosen. No special measuring equipment is required; indeed, its use can introduce bias and its benefits can be wasted by employing it to measure all the fibers in a complete nerve cross section instead of just a sample. The chapter reviews the principal sources of error involved in nerve fiber sampling and presents a recommendation of more efficient ways to select nerve fibers for counting and sizing. Various methods in which specimens can be sampled once the nerve trunks or tracts have been taken through the preliminary processing, sectioning, and staining procedures are also illustrated in the chapter.

[1]  John Zachary Young,et al.  The sizes of the nerve fibres of muscle nerves , 1951, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[2]  A. Windebank,et al.  Interstitial Hyperosmolarity May Cause Axis Cylinder Shrinkage in Streptozotocin Diabetic Nerve , 1980, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[3]  T. Mayhew,et al.  Inter‐animal variation and its influence on the overall precision of morphometric estimates based on nested sampling designs , 1983, Journal of microscopy.

[4]  C Kupfer,et al.  Quantitative histology of optic nerve, optic tract and lateral geniculate nucleus of man. , 1967, Journal of anatomy.

[5]  J Shay,et al.  Economy of effort in electron microscope morphometry. , 1975, The American journal of pathology.

[6]  H J Gundersen,et al.  The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction * , 1987, Journal of microscopy.

[7]  J. Fraher A quantitative study of anterior root fibres during early myelination. II. Longitudinal variation in sheath thickness and axon circumference. , 1973, Journal of anatomy.

[8]  T M Mayhew,et al.  Sampling schemes for estimating nerve fibre size. II. Methods for unifascicular nerve trunks. , 1984, Journal of anatomy.

[9]  T M Mayhew,et al.  Sampling schemes for estimating nerve fibre size. I. Methods for nerve trunks of mixed fascicularity. , 1984, Journal of anatomy.

[10]  W. Rushton A theory of the effects of fibre size in medullated nerve , 1951, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  P K Thomas,et al.  Age changes in the tibial and plantar nerves of the rat. , 1980, Journal of anatomy.

[12]  K. Bedi,et al.  A quantitative morphological study of interstrain variation in the developing rat optic nerve , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  D. P. Lloyd,et al.  Afferent fibers in muscle nerves. , 1948, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  R. L. Holmes,et al.  Progress in anatomy , 1981 .

[15]  Alan Stuart,et al.  Basic ideas of scientific sampling , 1963 .

[16]  A. Weddell,et al.  A quantitative study of peripheral nerve fibres in the mouse following the administration of drugs. 1. Age changes in untreated CBA mice from 3 to 21 months of age. , 1978, Journal of anatomy.

[17]  L M Cruz-Orive,et al.  Measuring error and sampling variation in stereology: comparison of the efficiency of various methods for planar image analysis , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[18]  T. Ellis,et al.  Automated measurement of peripheral nerve fibres in transverse section. , 1980, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[19]  P L Williams,et al.  Some additional parametric variations between peripheral nerve fibre populations. , 1971, Journal of anatomy.

[20]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  Conduction of the nerve impulse. , 1926, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[21]  P Berggren,et al.  Automated techniques for the study of lung alveolar stereological parameters with the IBAS image analyser on optical microscopy sections , 1983, Journal of microscopy.

[22]  G. Bestetti,et al.  Morphological and morphometric study of peripheral nerves from rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus , 2004, Acta Neuropathologica.

[23]  H. Haug,et al.  The postnatal development of myelinated nerve fibres in the visual cortex of the cat , 1976, Cell and Tissue Research.

[24]  K. Bedi,et al.  The effects of undernutrition during early life on the rat optic nerve fibre number and size‐frequency distribution , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  J P Fraher,et al.  On methods of measuring nerve fibres. , 1980, Journal of anatomy.

[26]  R. Friede,et al.  Relation between the number of myelin lamellae and axon circumference in fibers of vagus and sciatic nerves of mice , 1967, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  H. S. Gasser,et al.  Electrical Signs of Nervous Activity , 1937 .

[28]  J. Hursh CONDUCTION VELOCITY AND DIAMETER OF NERVE FIBERS , 1939 .

[29]  M. A. Biedenbach,et al.  Graphic-digitizer analysis of axon spectra in ethmoidal and lingual branches of the trigeminal nerve , 2004, Cell and Tissue Research.

[30]  J. T. W. A. Cornelisse,et al.  Profile boundary length can be overestimated by as much as 41% when using a digitizer tablet , 1984 .

[31]  R. Saxod,et al.  The density of myelinated fibres is related to the fascicle diameter in human superficial peroneal nerve Statistical study of 41 normal samples , 1985, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[32]  S Bradbury,et al.  Microscopical Image Analysis: Problems And Approaches * , 1979, Journal of microscopy.

[33]  H. A. Davenport,et al.  The Strip Method for Counting Nerve Fibers or other Microscopic Units , 1935 .

[34]  D. Harrison Fibre size frequency in the recurrent laryngeal nerves of man and giraffe. , 1981, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[35]  H. N. Magoun Thomas, Springfield, Illinois , 1965 .

[36]  W. Thurlbeck,et al.  The use of simple image analysers in lung morphometry , 1978, Journal of microscopy.

[37]  J. D. Fix,et al.  Morphometric analysis of autonomic neuropathology in the abdominal sympathetic trunk of the ketonuric diabetic Chinese hamster , 1981, Acta Neuropathologica.

[38]  T. Mayhew An efficient sampling scheme for estimating fibre number from nerve cross sections: the fractionator. , 1988, Journal of anatomy.

[39]  R. Friede,et al.  MYELIN FORMATION IN THE SCIATIC NERVE OF THE RAT: A QUANTITATIVE ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC, HISTOCHEMICAL AND RADIOAOTOGRAPHIC STUDY , 1968, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[40]  D. Greene,et al.  Distal neuropathy in experimental diabetes mellitus , 1980, Annals of neurology.

[41]  P. Thomas,et al.  Peripheral Nerve Fiber Size in Experimental Diabetes , 1977, Diabetes.

[42]  A Donovan,et al.  The nerve fibre composition of the cat optic nerve. , 1967, Journal of anatomy.

[43]  R. Østerby,et al.  Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or ‘Do more less well!‘ , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[44]  E. B. V. Jensen,et al.  Generalized associated point methods for sampling planar objects , 1986 .

[45]  A. Reith,et al.  Comparison of semiautomatic digitizer-tablet and simple point counting performance in morphometry , 1981, Virchows Archiv. B, Cell pathology including molecular pathology.

[46]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Notes on the estimation of the numerical density of arbitrary profiles: the edge effect , 1977 .

[47]  W E Kumley,et al.  Quantitative analysis of micrographs by computer graphics * , 1975, Journal of microscopy.