Team Resilience: A Neurodynamic Perspective

Neurophysiologic models were created from US Navy navigation teams performing required simulations that captured their dynamic responses to the changing task environment. Their performances were simultaneously rated by two expert observers for team resilience using a team process rubric adopted by the US Navy Submarine Force. Symbolic neurodynamic (NS) representations of the 1−40 Hz EEG amplitude fluctuations of the crew were created each second displaying the EEG levels of each team member in the context of the other crew members and in the context of the task. Quantitative estimates of the NS fluctuations were made using a moving window of entropy. Periods of decreased entropy were considered times of increased team neurodynamic organization; e.g. when there were prolonged and restricted relationships between the EEG- PSD levels of the crew. Resilient teams showed significantly greater neurodynamic organization in the pre-simulation Briefing than the less resilient teams. Most of these neurodynamic organizations occurred in the 25−40 Hz PSD bins. In contrast, the more resilient teams showed significantly lower neurodynamic organization during the Scenario than the less resilient teams with the greatest differences in the 12−20 Hz PSD bins. The results indicate that the degree of neurodynamic organization reflects the performance dynamics of the team with more organization being important during the pre-mission briefing while less organization (i.e. more flexibility) important while performing the task.

[1]  Tang,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise , 2011 .

[2]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Design of electrode layout for motor imagery based brain--computer interface , 2007 .

[3]  C. Finney,et al.  A review of symbolic analysis of experimental data , 2003 .

[4]  J. Kelso,et al.  The coordination dynamics of social neuromarkers , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  Eamonn J. Keogh,et al.  A symbolic representation of time series, with implications for streaming algorithms , 2003, DMKD '03.

[6]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Cognitive Neurophysiologic Synchronies , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Toward a quantitative description of the neurodynamic organizations of teams , 2014, Social neuroscience.

[8]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  Neural correlates of non-verbal social interactions: A dual-EEG study , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[10]  Lyle E. Bourne,et al.  Cognitive Performance and Resilience to Stress , 2008 .

[11]  E. Hollnagel FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Socio-technical Systems , 2012 .

[12]  Chris Berka,et al.  Real-Time Analysis of EEG Indexes of Alertness, Cognition, and Memory Acquired With a Wireless EEG Headset , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Actor's and observer's primary motor cortices stabilize similarly after seen or heard motor actions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  W. Klimesch,et al.  EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition–timing hypothesis , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[15]  J. Pineda Behavioral and Brain Functions BioMed Central Review , 2008 .

[16]  T. Harmony The functional significance of delta oscillations in cognitive processing , 2013, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[17]  M. Pasupathi,et al.  when the fACts just don't Add uP: the frACtAl nAture of ConversAtionAl stories , 2008 .

[18]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The human mirror neuron system: a link between action observation and social skills. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[19]  Rogier Woltjer,et al.  Resilience in Everyday Operations , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making.

[20]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Neural signatures of team coordination are revealed by multifractal analysis , 2014, Social neuroscience.

[21]  P. Uhlhaas,et al.  Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha–gamma versus theta–gamma codes for distinct WM information? , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Robert L. Wears,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[23]  M. Carandini,et al.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  David Woods,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006 .

[25]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  The Four Cornerstones of Resilience Engineering , 2016 .

[26]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  The organizational neurodynamics of teams. , 2013, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.