The effect of low-complexity patients on emergency department waiting times.

STUDY OBJECTIVE The extent to which patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with minor conditions contribute to delays and crowding is controversial. To test this question, we study the effect of low-complexity ED patients on the waiting times of other patients. METHODS We obtained administrative records on all ED visits to Ontario hospitals from April 2002 to March 2003. For each ED, we determined the association between the number of new low-complexity patients (defined as ambulatory arrival, low-acuity triage level, and discharged) presenting in each 8-hour interval and the mean ED length of stay and time to first physician contact for medium- and high-complexity patients. Covariates were the number of new high- and medium-complexity patients, mean patient age, sex distribution, hospital teaching status, work shift, weekday/weekend, and total patient-hours. Autoregression modeling was used given correlation in the data. RESULTS One thousand ninety-five consecutive 8-hour intervals at 110 EDs were analyzed; 4.1 million patient visits occurred, 50.8% of patients were women, and mean age was 38.4 years. Low-, medium-, and high-complexity patients represented 50.9%, 37.1%, and 12% of all patients, respectively. Mean (median) ED length of stay was 6.3 (4.7), 3.9 (2.8), and 2.2 (1.6) hours for high-, medium-, and low-complexity patients, respectively, and mean (median) time to first physician contact was 1.1 (0.7), 1.3 (0.9), and 1.1 (0.8) hours. In adjusted analyses, every 10 low-complexity patients arriving per 8 hours was associated with a 5.4-minute (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2 to 6.0 minutes) increase in mean length of stay and a 2.1-minute (95% CI 1.8 to 2.4 minutes) increase in mean time to first physician contact for medium- and high-complexity patients. Results were similar regardless of ED volume and teaching status. CONCLUSION Low-complexity ED patients are associated with a negligible increase in ED length of stay and time to first physician contact for other ED patients. Reducing the number of low-complexity ED patients is unlikely to reduce waiting times for other patients or lessen crowding.

[1]  M. Bullard,et al.  Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines. , 2004, CJEM.

[2]  Marian Vermeulen,et al.  Emergency department contributors to ambulance diversion: a quantitative analysis. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  L. Vertesi.  Does the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale identify non-urgent patients who can be triaged away from the emergency department? , 2004, CJEM.

[4]  S. Eldridge,et al.  'Inappropriate' attendance at an accident and emergency department by adults registered in local general practices: how is it related to their use of primary care? , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[5]  M. Callaham,et al.  Does lack of a usual source of care or health insurance increase the likelihood of an emergency department visit? Results of a national population-based study. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[6]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Next-Day Care for Emergency Department Users with Nonacute Conditions , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  K. Grumbach,et al.  Refusing care to emergency department of patients: evaluation of published triage guidelines. , 1994, Annals of emergency medicine.

[8]  S. Peiró,et al.  Inappropriate use of an accident and emergency department: magnitude, associated factors, and reasons--an approach with explicit criteria. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  R. Derlet,et al.  Prospective identification and triage of nonemergency patients out of an emergency department: a 5-year study. , 1995, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  N. Hearst,et al.  Costs of visits to emergency departments. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Safely directing patients to appropriate levels of care: guideline-driven triage in the emergency service. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  J. Richards,et al.  Survey of directors of emergency departments in California on overcrowding. , 2000, The Western journal of medicine.

[13]  Joshua H. Sarver,et al.  Usual source of care and nonurgent emergency department use. , 2002, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[14]  A. Kellermann,et al.  Emergency departments and crowding in United States teaching hospitals. , 1991, Annals of emergency medicine.

[15]  D A Redelmeier,et al.  Emergency department overcrowding following systematic hospital restructuring: trends at twenty hospitals over ten years. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[16]  Matthew S Howard,et al.  Patients' perspective on choosing the emergency department for nonurgent medical care: a qualitative study exploring one reason for overcrowding. , 2005, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[17]  Karin V Rhodes,et al.  A conceptual model of emergency department crowding. , 2003, Annals of emergency medicine.

[18]  M. Bullard,et al.  [Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines]. , 2004, CJEM.

[19]  S. Walter,et al.  Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[20]  S. Grover,et al.  Use of the emergency department for nonurgent care during regular business hours. , 1996, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[21]  Muhammad M Mamdani,et al.  Community influenza outbreaks and emergency department ambulance diversion. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[22]  B. Nelson,et al.  Statistical methodology: V. Time series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models. , 1998, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[23]  J. Richards,et al.  Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments: complex causes and disturbing effects. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[24]  R. Niska,et al.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2006 emergency department summary. , 2008, National health statistics reports.

[25]  A. Birnbaum,et al.  Failure to validate a predictive model for refusal of care to emergency-department patients. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[26]  L. Richardson,et al.  Access to care: a review of the emergency medicine literature. , 2001, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[27]  L. McCaig,et al.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2000 Emergency Department Summary , 2002 .

[28]  M. Ardagh,et al.  Effect of a rapid assessment clinic on the waiting time to be seen by a doctor and the time spent in the department, for patients presenting to an urban emergency department: a controlled prospective trial. , 2002, The New Zealand medical journal.