Undergraduate Haredi Students Studying Computer Science: Is Their Prior Education Merely a Barrier?.

Aim/Purpose Our research goal was to examine whether the prior, Talmud-based education of ultraorthodox Jewish men is merely a barrier to their academic studies or whether it can be recruited to leverage academic learning. Background This work is in line with the growing interest in extending the diversity of students studying in higher-education institutes and studying computer science (CS) in particular. Methodology We employed a mixed-methods approach. We compared the scores in CS courses of two groups of students who started their studies in the same college in 2015: 58 ultraorthodox men and 139 men with a conventional background of Israeli K-12 schooling. We also traced the solution processes of ultraorthodox men in tasks involving Logic, in which their group scored significantly better than the other group. Contribution The main contribution of this work lies in challenging the idea that the knowledge of unique cultures is merely a barrier and in illustrating the importance of further mapping such knowledge. Findings The ultraorthodox group’s grades in the courses never fell below the grades of the other group for the duration of the five semesters. Due to their intensive Talmud studies (which embeds Logic), we hypothesized they would have leverage in subjects relating to Logic; however this hypothesis was refuted. Nevertheless, we found that the ultraorthodox stuHaredi Students Studying Computer Science 198 dents tended to recruit conceptual knowledge rather than merely recalling a procedure to solve the task, as novices often do. Recommendations for Practitioners We concluded that these students’ unique knowledge should not be viewed merely as a barrier. Rather, it can and should be considered in terms of what and how it can anchor and leverage learning; this could facilitate the education of this unique population. Impact on Society This conclusion has an important implication, given the growing interest in diversifying higher education and CS in particular, to include representatives of groups in society that come from different, unique cultures. Future Research Students’ unique previous knowledge can and should be mapped, not only to foresee weaknesses that are an outcome of “fragile knowledge” , but also in terms of possible strengths, knowledge, values, and practices that can be used to anchor and expand the new knowledge.

[1]  R. Siegler,et al.  Geometric reasoning of ultra-orthodox and secular junior-high and high school students in Israel , 1997 .

[2]  Menahem Blondheim,et al.  Traditions of dispute: from negotiations of talmudic texts to the arena of political discourse in the media , 2002 .

[3]  M. Guzdial,et al.  Design process for a non-majors computing course , 2005, SIGCSE '05.

[4]  Audrey Bennett,et al.  Culturally Situated Design Tools: Ethnocomputing from Field Site to Classroom , 2006 .

[5]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Imagineering inauthentic legitimate peripheral participation: an instructional design approach for motivating computing education , 2006, ICER '06.

[6]  Lauri Malmi,et al.  Why students drop out CS1 course? , 2006, ICER '06.

[7]  Roli Varma,et al.  Making computer science minority-friendly , 2006, CACM.

[8]  Jens Bennedsen,et al.  Failure rates in introductory programming , 2007, SGCS.

[9]  Lynn Davidman,et al.  Characters in Search of a Script: The Exit Narratives of Formerly Ultra‐Orthodox Jews , 2007 .

[10]  Increasing diversity in k-12 computer science: strategies from the field , 2008, SIGCSE '08.

[11]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Proof by incomplete enumeration and other logical misconceptions , 2008, ICER '08.

[12]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Analysis of the Talmudic Argumentum A Fortiori Inference Rule (Kal Vachomer) using Matrix Abduction , 2009, Stud Logica.

[13]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Work in progress - students' misconceptions about state in digital systems , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[14]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Creating the digital logic concept inventory , 2010, SIGCSE.

[15]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Setting the Scope of Concept Inventories for Introductory Computing Subjects , 2010, TOCE.

[16]  Geoffrey L. Herman,et al.  A preliminary pedagogical comparison study using the digital logic concept inventory , 2010, 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[17]  Heidi A. Campbell,et al.  Creating digital enclaves: Negotiation of the internet among bounded religious communities , 2011 .

[18]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  How do students misunderstand number representations? , 2011, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[19]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Logical Analysis of the Talmudic Rules of General and Specific (Klalim-u-Pratim) , 2011 .

[20]  Barbara M. Olds,et al.  Rigorous Methodology for Concept Inventory Development: Using the 'Assessment Triangle' to Develop and Test the Thermal and Transport Science Concept Inventory (TTCI)* , 2011 .

[21]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[22]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  Obligations and prohibitions in Talmudic deontic logic , 2011, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[23]  Khawla Zoabi Self-Esteem and Motivation for Learning among Minority Students: A Comparison between Students of Pre-Academic and Regular Programs , 2012 .

[24]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  Describing the What and Why of Students’ Difficulties in Boolean Logic , 2012, TOCE.

[25]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Success in introductory programming: what works? , 2013, CACM.

[26]  Michael C. Loui,et al.  A psychometric evaluation of the digital logic concept inventory , 2014, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[27]  Dov M. Gabbay,et al.  The Handling of Loops in Talmudic Logic, with Application to Odd and Even Loops in Argumentation , 2014, HOWARD-60.

[28]  Amber Settle,et al.  Does Outreach Impact Choices of Major for Underrepresented Undergraduate Students? , 2015, ICER.

[29]  Yariv Feniger,et al.  Ethno-Religious Differences in Israeli Higher Education: Vertical and Horizontal Dimensions , 2015 .

[30]  A. Gero,et al.  Motivational factors for studying science and engineering in beginning students : the case of academic preparatory programmes , 2016 .