On core surface flows inferred from satellite magnetic data

Abstract Satellite-data allows the magnetic field produced by the dynamo within the Earth’s core to be imaged with much more accuracy than previously possible with only ground-based data. Changes in this magnetic field can in turn be used to make some inferences about the core surface flow responsible for them. In this paper, we investigate the improvement brought to core flow computation by new satellite-data based core magnetic field models. It is shown that the main limitation now encountered is no longer the (now high) accuracy of those models, but the “non-modelled secular variation” produced by interaction of the non-resolvable small scales of the core flow with the core field, and by interaction of the (partly) resolvable large scales of the core flow with the small scales of the core field unfortunately masked by the crustal field. We show how this non-modelled secular variation can be taken into account to recover the largest scales of the core flow in a consistent way. We also investigate the uncertainties this introduces in core flows computed with the help of the frozen-flux and tangentially geostrophic assumptions. It turns out that flows with much more medium and small scales than previously thought are needed to explain the satellite-data-based core magnetic field models. It also turns out that a significant fraction of this flow unfortunately happens to be non-recoverable (being either “non-resolvable” because too small-scale, or “invisible”, because in the kernel of the inverse method) even though it produces the detectable “non-modelled secular variation”. Applying this to the Magsat (1980) to Orsted (2000) field changes leads us to conclude that a flow involving at least strong retrograde vortices below the Atlantic Hemisphere, some less-resolved prograde vortices below the Pacific Hemisphere, and some poorly resolved (and partly non-resolvable) polar vortices, is needed to explain the 1980–2000 satellite-era average secular variation. The characteristics of the fraction of the secular variation left unexplained by this flow are also discussed.

[1]  J. Wahr,et al.  Taking into account truncation problems and geomagnetic model accuracy in assessing computed flows at the core—mantle boundary , 1992 .

[2]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Time‐dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core‐mantle boundary , 1992 .

[3]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  Length of day decade variations, torsional oscillations and inner core superrotation: evidence from recovered core surface zonal flows , 2000 .

[4]  C. Reigber,et al.  First champ mission results for gravity, magnetic and atmospheric studies , 2003 .

[5]  Edward Crisp Bullard,et al.  Kinematics of geomagnetic secular variation in a perfectly conducting core , 1968, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  J. Mouël.  Outer-core geostrophic flow and secular variation of Earth's geomagnetic field , 1984, Nature.

[7]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  A geomagnetic jerk for the end of the 20th century , 2000 .

[8]  Robert A. Langel,et al.  A geomagnetic field spectrum , 1982 .

[9]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Fluid flow near the surface of Earth's outer core , 1991 .

[10]  J. Achache,et al.  The global continent-ocean magnetization contrast , 1991 .

[11]  The region on the core—mantle boundary where a geostrophic velocity field can be determined from frozen-flux magnetic data , 1986 .

[12]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Geomagnetic field analysis—III. Magnetic fields on the core—mantle boundary , 1985 .

[13]  S. I. Braginskii.  Torsional Magnetohydrodynamic Vibrations in the Earth's Core and Variations in Day Length , 1970 .

[14]  C. Voorhies.  Coupling an Inviscid Core to an Electrically Insulating Mantle , 1991 .

[15]  Paul H. Roberts,et al.  Magnetohydrodynamics of the Earth's Core , 1972 .

[16]  D. Jault,et al.  Westward drift, core motions and exchanges of angular momentum between core and mantle , 1988, Nature.

[17]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  Small-scale structure of the geodynamo inferred from Oersted and Magsat satellite data , 2002, Nature.

[18]  A. Jackson,et al.  TIME-DEPENDENCY OF TANGENTIALLY GEOSTROPHIC CORE SURFACE MOTIONS , 1997 .

[19]  Ulrich R. Christensen,et al.  Core flow inversion tested with numerical dynamo models , 2000 .

[20]  George E. Backus,et al.  Bayesian inference in geomagnetism , 1988 .

[21]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Torsional oscillations and the magnetic field within the Earth's core , 1997, Nature.

[22]  R. Holme.  Electromagnetic core—mantle coupling—I. Explaining decadal changes in the length of day , 2002 .

[23]  Matthew R. Walker,et al.  Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[24]  A. Chulliat,et al.  On the possibility of quantifying diffusion and horizontal Lorentz forces at the Earth’s core surface , 2003 .

[25]  John M. Wahr,et al.  Aliasing and noise in core-surface flow inversions , 1996 .

[26]  S. Maus,et al.  Introducing POMME, the POtsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth , 2005 .

[27]  Andrew Jackson,et al.  Equatorially Dominated Magnetic Field Change at the Surface of Earth's Core , 2003, Science.

[28]  John Leif Jørgensen,et al.  Ørsted satellite captures high‐precision geomagnetic field data , 2001 .

[29]  K. Whaler.  Geomagnetic secular variation and fluid motion at the core surface , 1982, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[30]  Paul H. Roberts,et al.  On Analysis of the Secular Variation , 1965 .

[31]  B. Langlais,et al.  High-resolution magnetic field modeling: application to MAGSAT and Ørsted data , 2003 .

[32]  C. Reigber.  Earth Observation with CHAMP : Results from Three Years in Orbit , 2005 .

[33]  A. Chulliat,et al.  Local computation of the geostrophic pressure at the top of the core , 2000 .

[34]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  An estimate of average lower mantle conductivity by wavelet analysis of geomagnetic jerks , 1999 .

[35]  A. Chulliat.  Geomagnetic secular variation generated by a tangentially geostrophic flow under the frozen‐flux assumption—II. Sufficient conditions , 2004 .

[36]  C. Gire,et al.  Tangentially geostrophic flow at the core-mantle boundary compatible with the observed geomagnetic secular variation: the large-scale component of the flow , 1990 .

[37]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  Ørsted Initial Field Model , 2000 .

[38]  G. Hulot,et al.  The Flow at the Core-Mantle Boundary , 1990 .

[39]  Nils Olsen,et al.  A model of the geomagnetic field and its secular variation for epoch 2000 estimated from Ørsted data , 2002 .

[40]  George E. Backus,et al.  Steady flows at the top of the core from geomagnetic field models: The steady motions theorem , 1985 .

[41]  Nils Olsen,et al.  CO2 — A Champ Magnetic Field Model , 2003 .