Criteria Assessment in Sustainable Macromanagement of Housing Provision Problem by a Multi-phase Decision Approach with DEMATEL and Dynamic Uncertainty

Macromanagement of housing provision based on sustainable development characteristics may be required for applying some different strategies to ensure the housing preparation regarding economic, environmental, and social competencies. In this regard, there are some challenges, including defining the criteria in a hierarchical structure to check the problem in all aspects, computing experts’ weights for reducing judgments’ errors, computing interdependencies effects among criteria to increase the precise of criteria weight determination, dynamic criteria’ weights evaluation to analyze the criteria importance in some different periods, and uncertainty modeling of criteria weights computations in the research area, in which recent studies did not focus them simultaneously. To address the issue, this study proposes a multi-phase weighting approach by combining the collective index and decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) methodologies via dynamic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets (DIVHFSs) theory. Considering dynamic uncertainty is needed for covering the incomplete information in various periods because the significance and impact of evaluation criteria may be changed in each period. On the other hand, DIVHFSs theory could assist the experts by assigning some dynamic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy (DIVHF)-membership degrees for an element under a set to decrease the errors. In proposed DIVHF-collective index method, criteria local weights are obtained based on correlation and standard deviation approaches under a DIVHF-environment. In addition, the extended DEMATEL methodology is prepared for taking account of hierarchical structure and criteria interdependencies relations. Moreover, a novel DIVHF-utility degree method is presented to compute the weight of each expert. Then, experts’ weights are taken into account in the presented multi-phase weighting approach. In addition, the DIVHF-multi-phase weighting approach based on collective index and DEMATEL (DIVHF-MPW-CI–DEMATEL) methodologies is proposed via a last aggregation approach to keep away from the data loss. Meanwhile, some needed operations on DIVHFS theory for presenting DIVHF-MPW-CI–DEMATEL methodology are extended. Finally, a real case study about the determining criteria’ weights for strategy selection in macromanagement of housing provision problem based on sustainable development properties is prepared to indicate the feasibility and applicability of proposed DIVHF-MPW-CI–DEMATELs approach.

[1]  S. M. Mousavi,et al.  A New Balancing and Ranking Method based on Hesitant Fuzzy Sets for Solving Decision-making Problems under Uncertainty , 2015 .

[2]  Huaguang Zhang,et al.  Chaotic Dynamics in Smart Grid and Suppression Scheme via Generalized Fuzzy Hyperbolic Model , 2014 .

[3]  Saskia Keesstra,et al.  Evaluation of watershed health using Fuzzy-ANP approach considering geo-environmental and topo-hydrological criteria. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Hua Wang,et al.  Dynamic hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators in multi-period decision making , 2014, Kybernetes.

[5]  K. Devi,et al.  A multicriteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for plant location selection with ELECTRE method , 2012, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[6]  Yusuf Tansel İç,et al.  An experimental design approach using TOPSIS method for the selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies , 2012 .

[7]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[8]  Lihong Chen,et al.  Multi-attribute sustainability evaluation of alternative aviation fuels based on fuzzy ANP and fuzzy grey relational analysis , 2017 .

[9]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[10]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  A new approach of multi-criteria analysis for the evaluation and selection of sustainable transport investment projects under uncertainty: A case study , 2017, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[11]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[12]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[13]  Ying Luo,et al.  Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..

[14]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations , 2004, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  B. Farhadinia,et al.  Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[17]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[19]  Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi,et al.  Power plant project risk assessment using a fuzzy-ANP and fuzzy-TOPSIS method , 2012 .

[20]  Gui-Wu Wei,et al.  Maximizing deviation method for multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting , 2008, Knowl. Based Syst..

[21]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  Soft computing-based new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group assessment method with last aggregation to industrial decision problems , 2017, Soft Comput..

[22]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  A hesitant fuzzy cognitive mapping approach with risk preferences for student accommodation problems , 2017 .

[23]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  A Consensus Support System Model for Group Decision-Making Problems With Multigranular Linguistic Preference Relations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[24]  B. Vahdani,et al.  Selecting suppliers using a new fuzzy multiple criteria decision model: the fuzzy balancing and ranking method , 2010 .

[25]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A new integrated intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making approach for product development partner selection , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[26]  Yingjun Zhang,et al.  Objective Attributes Weights Determining Based on Shannon Information Entropy in Hesitant Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2014 .

[27]  Paul Goodwin,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgment , 1998 .

[28]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  Selection of IT outsourcing services' activities considering services cost and risks by designing an interval-valued hesitant fuzzy-decision approach , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[29]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  The Choquet integral with respect to a level dependent capacity , 2011, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[30]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[31]  Ching-Fu Chen,et al.  Determining the Attribute Weights of Professional Conference Organizer Selection: An Application of the Fuzzy AHP Approach , 2011 .

[32]  Arun Kumar Sangaiah,et al.  An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL, TOPSIS, and ELECTRE approach for evaluating knowledge transfer effectiveness with reference to GSD project outcome , 2015, Neural Computing and Applications.

[33]  Quan Zhang,et al.  An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on preference information on alternatives , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Multiple-Attribute Group Decision Making With Different Formats of Preference Information on Attributes , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[35]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  A New Compromise Solution Model Based on Dantzig-Wolfe Decomposition for Solving Belief Multi-Objective Nonlinear Programming Problems with Block Angular Structure , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[36]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  A mathematical modeling approach for high and new technology-project portfolio selection under uncertain environments , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[37]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  A new multi-criteria weighting and ranking model for group decision-making analysis based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets to selection problems , 2015, Neural Computing and Applications.

[38]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on fuzzy preference relations , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[39]  Chao Wang,et al.  Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[40]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  A hybrid linguistic fuzzy multiple criteria group selection of a chief accounting officer , 2014 .

[41]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  The maximizing deviation method for group multiple attribute decision making under linguistic environment , 2007, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[42]  I. Keramitsoglou,et al.  Heat wave hazard classification and risk assessment using artificial intelligence fuzzy logic , 2013, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[43]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[44]  Bruce E. Barrett,et al.  Decision quality using ranked attribute weights , 1996 .

[45]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority , 1992 .

[46]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  Soft computing based on hierarchical evaluation approach and criteria interdependencies for energy decision-making problems: A case study , 2017 .

[47]  Ping-Feng Pai,et al.  Sustainable supply chain management using approximate fuzzy DEMATEL method , 2018 .

[48]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Interval programming method for hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete preference over alternatives , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[49]  Serena Doria,et al.  Characterization of a coherent upper conditional prevision as the Choquet integral with respect to its associated Hausdorff outer measure , 2012, Ann. Oper. Res..

[50]  S. H. Pishgar-Komleh,et al.  Prophesying egg production based on energy consumption using multi-layered adaptive neural fuzzy inference system approach , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[51]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  An Adaptive Consensus Support Model for Group Decision-Making Problems in a Multigranular Fuzzy Linguistic Context , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[52]  Shanwen Zhang,et al.  Dimension Reduction Using Semi-Supervised Locally Linear Embedding for Plant Leaf Classification , 2009, ICIC.

[53]  T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making , 1984 .

[54]  H. Gitinavard,et al.  A soft computing based-modified ELECTRE model for renewable energy policy selection with unknown information , 2017 .

[55]  Oscar Castillo,et al.  A review on the applications of type-2 fuzzy logic in classification and pattern recognition , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[56]  S. Mahadevan,et al.  A new method of identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on TOPSIS , 2014 .

[57]  Turan Paksoy,et al.  Organizational strategy development in distribution channel management using fuzzy AHP and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[58]  Oscar Castillo,et al.  A review on type-2 fuzzy logic applications in clustering, classification and pattern recognition , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[59]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[60]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis , 2008, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[61]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A general multiple attribute decision-making approach for integrating subjective preferences and objective information , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[62]  Kwok-wing Chau,et al.  Assessment of River Water Quality Based on Theory of Variable Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Binary Comparison Method , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[63]  R. Green,et al.  Judging Relative Importance: Direct Rating and Point Allocation Are Not Equivalent , 1997, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[64]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A Mobile Decision Support System for Dynamic Group Decision-Making Problems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[65]  Xiaozhan Xu,et al.  A note on the subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[66]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Novel fuzzy hybrid multi-criteria group decision making approaches for the strategic supplier selection problem , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[67]  Bellie Sivakumar,et al.  Neural network river forecasting through baseflow separation and binary-coded swarm optimization , 2015 .

[68]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  A hesitant fuzzy extension of VIKOR method for evaluation and selection problems under uncertainty , 2017 .

[69]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[70]  Wanli Zuo,et al.  TOPSIS method for hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making , 2014, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[71]  Jian Ma,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[72]  John R. Doyle,et al.  A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best , 2001 .

[73]  Petr Ekel,et al.  A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[74]  C. L. Wu,et al.  Rainfall–runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis , 2011 .

[75]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  An Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Method to Determine the Criteria Weights , 2015, GDN.

[76]  Byeong Seok Ahn,et al.  Comparing methods for multiattribute decision making with ordinal weights , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[77]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  A multiple attribute interval type-2 fuzzy group decision making and its application to supplier selection with extended LINMAP method , 2017, Soft Comput..

[78]  J. Dombi,et al.  A method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights , 1986 .

[79]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[80]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  A new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy pairwise comparison–compromise solution methodology: an application to cross-docking location planning , 2019, Neural Computing and Applications.

[81]  Kwok-wing Chau,et al.  A novel hybrid neural network based on continuity equation and fuzzy pattern-recognition for downstream daily river discharge forecasting , 2015 .

[82]  P. Goodwin,et al.  Weight approximations in multi-attribute decision models , 2002 .