Dimensions of Experienced Responsive Teaching in Engineering

Dimensions of Experienced Responsive Teaching in Engineering Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, Tufts University Aaron W. Johnson is a postdoctoral research associate at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. He received his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2014, where his research focused on human-automation interaction in complex aerospace vehicles. Aaron also obtained a master’s degree from MIT in 2010 and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan in 2008, both in aerospace engineering. Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University Kristen B. Wendell is Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Assistant Professor of Education at Tufts University, where she leads an interdisciplinary research group at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. Jessica Watkins, Tufts University

[1]  Janet Coffey,et al.  Dynamics of disciplinary understandings and practices of attending to student thinking in elementary teacher education , 2010, ICLS.

[2]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Using Video to Support Teachers’ Ability to Notice Classroom Interactions , 2005 .

[3]  Aaron W. Johnson,et al.  Noticing, Assessing, and Responding to Students' Engineering: Exploring a Responsive Teaching Approach to Engineering Design , 2016 .

[4]  David Hammer,et al.  The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment , 2011 .

[5]  Kristen B. Wendell.  Design Practices of Preservice Elementary Teachers in an Integrated Engineering and Literature Experience. , 2014 .

[6]  Jennifer Evarts Lineback,et al.  The Redirection: An Indicator of How Teachers Respond to Student Thinking , 2015 .

[7]  Merredith Portsmore,et al.  Elementary School Engineering for Fictional Clients in Children’s Literature , 2016 .

[8]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Teaching engineering design: Can reading a textbook make a difference? , 1996 .

[9]  Jennifer Richards,et al.  Exploring what stabilizes teachers' attention and responsiveness to the substance of students' scientific thinking in the classroom , 2013 .

[10]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club , 2008 .

[11]  Robin Adams,et al.  The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix , 2012 .

[12]  M. Franke,et al.  Developing Pedagogies in Teacher Education to Support Novice Teachers' Ability to Enact Ambitious Instruction , 2009 .

[13]  Kristen B. Wendell,et al.  Student Videos as a Tool for Elementary Teacher Development in Teaching Engineering: What Do Teachers Notice? (Research to Practice) , 2014 .

[14]  Jenny L. Daugherty,et al.  Secondary level engineering professional development: content, pedagogy, and challenges , 2012 .

[15]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Teacher Learning in the Context of a Video Club. , 2004 .

[16]  Morgan M. Hynes,et al.  Engineering in a Fictional World: Early Findings from Integrating Engineering and Literacy , 2012 .

[17]  Kees Dorst,et al.  On the problem of design problems - problem solving and design expertise , 2004 .

[18]  John S. Gero,et al.  Drawings and the design process , 1998 .

[19]  David Hammer,et al.  Examining Young Students' Problem Scoping in Engineering Design. , 2014 .

[20]  Fred Goldberg,et al.  Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom , 2012 .

[21]  David Hammer,et al.  Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics , 2015 .

[22]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[23]  Aaron W. Johnson,et al.  Eliciting Informed Designer Patterns from Elementary Students with Open-ended Problems (Fundamental) , 2015 .

[24]  D. Ball.  With an Eye on the Mathematical Horizon: Dilemmas of Teaching Elementary School Mathematics , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[25]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[26]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  Learning to Listen to Children’s Mathematics , 2008 .