The development of extended turns and storytelling in the Japanese oral proficiency interview

The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines — Speaking and the oral proficiency interview (OPI) have had a long-standing impact on foreign language pedagogies in the United States. The Guidelines have been widely adopted as a curriculum benchmark in foreign language programs in colleges and secondary schools, and the ACTFL OPI, which measures foreign language speaking proficiency based on the criteria described in the Guidelines, has been used for various assessment purposes, such as program evaluation and accreditation, entrance and exit requirement, placement test, and teacher certification (Chambless, 2012; Houston, 2005; Kagan & Friedman, 2003; Kondo-Brown, 2012; Rifkin, 2003; Wetzel & Watanabe, 1998). Today, the Guidelines and the OPI have considerable influence not only on how teachers and professionals evaluate L2 speakers’ oral proficiency, but also on how foreign language programs are developed, implemented, evaluated, and revised. As such, it is the responsibility of ACTFL and the users of the Guidelines to examine and assure the adequacy of level descriptions in the Guidelines and the quality of the OPI.

[1]  A Study of Interrater Reliability of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview in Five European Languages: Data from ESL, French, German, Russian, and Spanish. , 1995 .

[2]  S. Ross.  Accommodative questions in oral proficiency interviews , 1992 .

[3]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  Multiple questions in oral proficiency interviews , 2007 .

[4]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  Reeling, Writhing, Drawling, Stretching, and Fainting in Coils: Oral Proficiency Interviews as Conversation , 1989 .

[5]  Gail Jefferson,et al.  Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation , 1978 .

[6]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  Proficiency: Understanding the Construct. , 1988 .

[7]  Erich C. Dierdorff,et al.  Reliability and the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview: Reporting Indices of Interrater Consistency and Agreement for 19 Languages. , 2003 .

[8]  H. T. Nguyen.  Sequence organization as local and longitudinal achievement , 2008 .

[9]  Cecilia E. Ford,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns , 1996 .

[10]  Michael Milanovic,et al.  Discourse Variation in Oral Proficiency Interviews , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[11]  E. Schegloff.  Interaction and grammar: Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction , 1996 .

[12]  C. Goodwin.  Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn‐Beginning , 1980 .

[13]  Duck-Young Lee,et al.  The role of the overt expression of first and second person subject in Japanese , 2008 .

[14]  Hiroko Tanaka,et al.  Turn-taking in Japanese conversation : a study in grammar and interaction , 2000 .

[15]  Anne Lazaraton,et al.  A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests , 2002 .

[16]  Amy Snyder Ohta,et al.  Pragmatics in Language Teaching: A longitudinal study of the development of expression of alignment in Japanese as a foreign language , 2001 .

[17]  Kimi Kondo-Brown,et al.  Investigating Interviewer‐Candidate Interactions During Oral Interviews for Child L2 Learners , 2004 .

[18]  C. Goodwin.  Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation , 1986 .

[19]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word , 1986 .

[20]  Olga Kagan,et al.  Using the OPI to Place Heritage Speakers of Russian , 2003 .

[21]  Sally Sieloff Magnan.  Grammar and the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview: Discussion and Data , 1988 .

[22]  Tony Houston.  Outcomes Assessment for Beginning and Intermediate Spanish: One Program's Process and Results , 2005 .

[23]  Glenn Fulcher,et al.  Invalidating Validity Claims for the ACTFL Oral Rating Scale. , 1996 .

[24]  Lyle F. Bachman,et al.  The Evaluation of Communicative Language Proficiency: A Critique of the ACTFL Oral Interview , 1986 .

[25]  Olga Pahom.  An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. 2nd Edn , 2013 .

[26]  Rebecca Clift.  Meaning in Interaction: The Case of actually , 2001 .

[27]  Annie Brown,et al.  Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency , 2003 .

[28]  Rebecca Clift,et al.  Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction , 2006 .

[29]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Structures of Social Action: Notes on story structure and the organization of participation , 1985 .

[30]  Claire J. Kramsch.  From Language Proficiency to Interactional Competence , 1986 .

[31]  Yusuke Okada,et al.  Role-play in oral proficiency interviews: Interactive footing and interactional competencies , 2010 .

[32]  J. Wagner,et al.  Developmental issues in second language conversation , 2007 .

[33]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  The Discourse of Accommodation in Oral Proficiency Interviews , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[34]  Benjamin A. Rifkin,et al.  Oral Proficiency Learning Outcomes and Curricular Design , 2003 .

[35]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  A comparative task-in-interaction analysis of OPI backsliding , 2007 .

[36]  D. Yoshimi.  Pragmatics in Language Teaching: Explicit instruction and JFL learner's use of interactional discourse markers , 2001 .

[37]  H. T. Nguyen.  Developing Interactional Competence , 2012 .

[38]  Marysia Johnson.  The Art of Non-conversation , 2008 .

[39]  Judith E. Liskin-Gasparro,et al.  Circumlocution, communication strategies and the ACTFL proficiency guidelines: an analysis of student discourse , 1996 .

[40]  Pardee Lowe.  Proficiency: Panacea, Framework, Process? A Reply to Kramsch, Schulz, and, Particularly, to Bachman and Savignon. , 1986 .

[41]  Shoichi Iwasaki,et al.  The Northridge earthquake conversations: The floor structure and the ‘loop’ sequence in Japanese conversation☆ , 1997 .

[42]  Suwako Watanabe.  Cohesion and Coherence Strategies in Paragraph‐Length and Extended Discourse in Japanese Oral Proficiency Interviews , 2003 .

[43]  Lyle F. Bachman.  Problems in Examining the Validity of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview , 1988, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[44]  R. Young,et al.  LEARNING AS CHANGING PARTICIPATION: DISCOURSE ROLES IN ESL WRITING CONFERENCES , 2004 .

[45]  Judith E. Liskin–Gasparro.  Narrative Strategies: A Case Study of Developing Storytelling Skills by a Learner of Spanish. , 1996 .

[46]  P. Brown.  Interaction and the development of mind , 1997 .

[47]  E. Schegloff.  Sequence Organization In Interaction , 2007 .

[48]  E. Schegloff.  Discourse as an interactional achievement : Some uses of "Uh huh" and other things that come between sentences , 1982 .

[49]  Hanh thi Nguyen,et al.  Talk-in-interaction : multilingual perspectives , 2009 .

[50]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction , 1979 .

[51]  Krista S. Chambless.  Teachers' oral proficiency in the target language: research on its role in language teaching and learning , 2012 .

[52]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[53]  Jack Sidnell,et al.  Conversation Analysis: List of tables , 2009 .

[54]  Richard Young,et al.  Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency. Studies in Bilingualism, Volume 14. , 1998 .

[55]  Gabriele Kasper,et al.  When once is not enough: Politeness of multiple requests in oral proficiency interviews , 2006 .